California's Energy Crisisby steve - 2001-07-26 ( education / politics / energy ) [html version]Steve Subject: energy crisis Date: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:13 AM Dear Mark Williams (KFBK talk show host, for those others getting this message) You mentioned the $2,000 price of energy the other day, not paid to the power generators, but to the middlemen. From what I understand, (and please correct me where I am mistaken) energy is to be bought daily and that is why we have middlemen like Enron. Enron scoops up contracts for energy (probably on long-term) for low rates. If the state didn't ask for enough energy early enough, it has to go to the spot market, through the ISO, probably still dealing with middlemen such as Enron. So, here's the game: Enron is nice enough to offer $10 per megawatt to the energy producers, giving them more than their costs and keeping them happy. It holds that energy hostage until the day before when the state has to choose how much it wants to get, telling the state it has 99% of the energy needed. The state has to use the ISO to get that last 1% of the energy (that middlemen have tied up). The only energy left to obtain (because middlemen have 99% of it tied up) is very expensive, like $2,000 per megawatt. Because the price for the day is set by the last seller to energy pool, the 99% held by middlemen plus the 1% held by tiny local producers is sold for $2,000. Well, guess what? Enron makes $1990 on 99% of the energy, making enormous profits. Does Enron sell all of its energy? No, but if it makes so much on what it sells, it can throw away a lot and probably writes it off as a loss! Follow the money! So who owns Enron and the other middlemen? is it people like George Bush, Dick Cheney, and others in his crowd? Yes! So, guess why they don't want to conserve? Would production of more efficient devices help the economy? Yes, because industry would hustle to build them and customers would (and are) hustling to buy them. So, it looks like our administration is anti-conservation because they want to rape the people's savings to fill their own coffers! Can we do something about it? Yeah, but not what the whole media scene is saying. First, change it so energy is not bought daily through middlemen. Second, don't have the day's price set by the last (and most expensive) supplier. Third, tell the power people that the state of California will not buy energy over a certain reasonable price, making it so it's not profitable for middlemen to hold back energy and write it off until their other purchases can be sold at obscene prices. Will anyone do this? Not unless someone who has a soap box to stand on, like radio, TV, and the papers point these simple things out! Steve Holmes Snippets from a Political Discussion Re Election 2000by bill - 2001-07-26 ( education / civics / politics / legal ) [html version]Don Subject: Your Supreme Court statement This analysis, written by a California attorney, is a challenging read, but worth wading through... Q: I'm not a lawyer and I don't understand the recent Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore. Can you explain it to me? A: Sure. I'm a lawyer. I read it. It says Bush wins, even if Gore got the most votes. Q: But wait a second. The US Supreme Court has to give a reason, right? A: Right. Q: So Bush wins because hand-counts are illegal? A: Oh no. Six of the justices (two-thirds majority) believed the hand-counts were legal and should be done. Q: Oh. So the justices did not believe that the hand-counts would find any legal ballots? A: Nope. The five conservative justices clearly held (and all nine justices agreed) "that punch card balloting machines can produce an unfortunate number of ballots which are not punched in a clean, complete way by the voter." So there are legal votes that should be counted but can't be. Q: Oh. Does this have something to do with states' rights? Don't conservatives love that? A: Generally yes. These five justices have held that the federal government has no business telling a sovereign state university it can't steal trade secrets just because such stealing is prohibited by law. Nor does the federal government have any business telling a state that it should bar guns in schools. Nor can the federal government use the equal protection clause to force states to take measures to stop violence against women. Q: Is there an exception in this case? A: Yes, the Gore exception. States have no rights to have their own state elections when it can result in Gore being elected President. This decision is limited to only this situation. Q: C'mon. The Supremes didn't really say that. You're exaggerating. A: Nope. They held "Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, or the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities." Q: What complexities? A: They don't say. Q: I'll bet I know the reason. I heard Jim Baker say this. The votes can't be counted because the Florida Supreme Court "changed the rules of the election after it was held." Right? A: Dead wrong. The US Supreme Court made clear that the Florida Supreme Court did not change the rules of the election. But the US Supreme Court found the failure of the Florida Court to change the rules was wrong. Q: Huh? A: The Legislature declared that the only legal standard for counting vote is "clear intent of the voter." The Florida Court was condemned for not adopting a clearer standard. Q: I thought the Florida Court was not allowed to change the Legislature's law after the election. A: Right. Q: So what's the problem? A: They should have. The US Supreme Court said the Florida Supreme Court should have "adopt[ed] adequate statewide standards for determining what is a legal vote" Q: I thought only the Legislature could "adopt" new law. A: Right. Q: So if the Court had adopted new standards, I thought it would have been overturned. A: Right. You're catching on. Q: If the Court had adopted new standards, it would have been overturned for changing the rules. And if it didn't, it's overturned for not changing the rules. That means that no matter what the Florida Supreme Court did, legal votes could never be counted. A: Right. Next question. Q: Wait, wait. I thought the problem was "equal protection," that some counties counted votes differently from others. Isn't that a problem? A: It sure is. Across the nation, we vote in a hodgepodge of systems. Some, like the optical-scanners in largely Republican-leaning counties record 99.7% of the votes. Some, like the punchcard systems in largely Democratic-leaning counties record only 97% of the votes. So approximately 3% of "Democratic" votes are thrown in the trash can. Q: Aha! That's a severe equal-protection problem!!! A: No it's not. The Supreme Court wasn't worried about the 3% of "Democratic" ballots thrown in the trashcan in Florida. That "complexity" was not a problem. Q: Was it the butterfly ballots that violated Florida law and tricked more than 20,000 Democrats to vote for Buchanan or Gore and Buchanan. A: Nope. The Supreme Court has no problem believing that Buchanan got his highest, best support in a precinct consisting of a Jewish old age home with Holocaust survivors, who apparently have changed their mind about Hitler. Q: Yikes. So what was the serious equal protection problem? A: The problem was neither the butterfly ballot nor the 3% of Democrats (largely African-American) disenfranchised. The problem is that somewhat less than .005% of the ballots may have been determined under slightly different standards because judges sworn to uphold the law and doing their best to accomplish the legislative mandate of "clear intent of the voter" may have a slightly opinion about the voter's intent. Q: Hmmm. OK, so if those votes are thrown out, you can still count the votes where everyone agrees the voter's intent is clear? A: Nope. Q: Why not? A: No time. Q: No time to count legal votes where everyone, even Republicans, agree the intent is clear? Why not? A: Because December 12 was yesterday. Q: Is December 12 a deadline for counting votes? A: No. January 6 is the deadline. In 1960, Hawaii's votes weren't counted until January 4. Q: So why is December 12 important? A: December 12 is a deadline by which Congress can't challenge the results. Q: What does the Congressional role have to do with the Supreme Court? A: Nothing. Q: But I thought --- A: The Florida Supreme Court had earlier held it would like to complete its work by December 12 to make things easier for Congress. The United States Supreme Court is trying to help the Florida Supreme Court out by forcing the Florida court to abide by a deadline that everyone agrees is not binding. Q: But I thought the Florida Court was going to just barely have the votes counted by December 12. A: They would have made it, but the five conservative justices stopped the recount last Saturday. Q: Why? A: Justice Scalia said some of the counts may not be legal. Q: So why not separate the votes into piles, indentations for Gore, hanging chads for Bush, votes that everyone agrees went to one candidate or the other so that we know exactly how Florida voted before determining who won. Then, if some ballots (say, indentations) have to be thrown out, the American people will know right away who won Florida. A: Great idea! The US Supreme Court rejected it. They held that such counts would likely to produce election results showing Gore won and Gore's winning would cause "public acceptance" and that would "cast[] a cloud" over Bush's "legitimacy" that would harm "democratic stability." Q: In other words, if America knows the truth that Gore won, they won't accept the US Supreme Court overturning Gore's victory? A: Yes. Q: Is that a legal reason to stop recounts? or a political one? A: Let's just say in all of American history and all of American law, this reason has no basis in law. But that doesn't stop the five conservatives from creating new law out of thin air. Q: Aren't these conservative justices against judicial activism? A: Yes, when liberal judges are perceived to have done it. Q: Well, if the December 12 deadline is not binding, why not count the votes? A: The US Supreme Court, after admitting the December 12 deadline is not binding, set December 12 as a binding deadline at 10 p.m. on December 12. Q: Didn't the US Supreme Court condemn the Florida Supreme Court for arbitrarily setting a deadline? A: Yes. Q: But, but -- A: Not to worry. The US Supreme Court does not have to follow laws it sets for other courts. Q: So who caused Florida to miss the December 12 deadline? A: The Bush lawyers who first went to court to stop the recount, the rent-a-mob in Miami that got paid Florida vacations for intimidating officials, and the US Supreme Court for stopping the recount Q: So who is punished for this behavior? A: Gore, of course. Q: Tell me this, Florida's laws are unconstitutional? A: Yes Q: And the laws of 50 states that allow votes to be cast or counted differently are unconstitutional? A: Yes. And 33 states have the "clear intent of the voter" standard that the US Supreme Court found was illegal in Florida Q: Then why aren't the results of 33 states thrown out? A: Um. Because ... um ... the Supreme Court doesn't say. Q: But if Florida's certification includes counts expressly declared by the US Supreme Court to be unconstitutional, we don't know who really won the election there, right? A: Right. Though a careful analysis by the Miami Herald shows Gore won Florida by about 20,000 votes (excluding the butterfly ballot errors) Q: So, what do we do, have a re-vote? throw out the entire state? count under a single uniform standard? A: No. We just don't count the votes that favor Gore. Q: That's completely bizarre! That sounds like rank political favoritism! Did the justices have any financial interest in the case? A: Scalia's two sons are both lawyers working for Bush. Thomas's wife is collecting applications for people who want to work in the Bush administration. Q: Why didn't they recuse themselves? A: If either had recused himself, the vote would be 4-4, and the Florida Supreme Court decision allowing recounts would have been affirmed. Q: I can't believe the justices acted in such a blatantly political way. A: Read the opinions for yourself: December 12 2000 opinion Q: So what are the consequences of this? A: The guy who got the most votes in the US and in Florida and under our Constitution (Al Gore) will lose to America's second choice who won the all important 5-4 Supreme Court vote. Q: I thought in a democracy, the guy with the most votes wins. A: True, in a democracy. But America is not a democracy. In America in 2000, the guy with the most US Supreme Court votes wins. Q: So what will happen to the Supreme Court when Bush becomes President. A: He will appoint more justices in the mode of Thomas and Scalia to ensure that the will of the people is less and less respected. Soon lawless justices may constitute 6-3 or even 7-2 on the court. Q: Is there any way to stop this? A: YES. No federal judge can be confirmed without a vote in the Senate. It takes 60 votes to break a filibuster. If only 41 of the 50 "Democratic" Senators stand up to Bush and his Supremes and say that they will not approve a single judge appointed by him until a President can be democratically elected in 2004, the judicial reign of terror can end...and one day we can hope to return to the rule of law. Q: What do I do now? A: Email this to everyone you know, and write or call your senator, reminding him that Gore beat Bush by several hundred thousand votes (three times Kennedy's margin over Nixon) and that you believe that VOTERS rather than JUDGES should determine who wins an election by counting every vote. And to protect our judiciary from overturning the will of the people, you want them to confirm NO NEW JUDGES until 2004 when a president is finally chosen by most of the American people. Mark H. Levine, Attorney at Law Steve It's the last baseball game of the season. The Democrats are a half game ahead of the Republicans in wins. The game is being held in Florida. It's the bottom of the ninth inning and the Democrats are up to bat. The Republicans are ahead by 1 run. The Democrats have one man on base. The count is 3 balls and two strikes. The Democrat batter hit a high ball, down the left field line, higher than the foul line pole. The Republicans start to march, declaring that the Democrats are "sore losers" and that the Republicans won because the ball was out of bounds. The Democrats call the ball in and a home run. The Republicans protest the game, calling a time out. One judge calls the ball fair. Another judge calls the ball foul. It starts to rain. The owner of the ball park, who is a Republican fan turns out the lights because it looks like rain. The judges meet and say the season is over and that the Republicans won because they had the most points when the lights were turned off. Mark Try this scenario instead: The Democrats and Republicans are playing the baseball game in Florida. The Republicans win, albeit barely. Since so many runs were scored, and the game was so close, the umpires review videotapes of the game to determine whether or not each run should count. As in prior baseball games, some players neglected to touch all the bases, so their runs didn't count. After their review, the umpires determine that the Republicans were indeed the winners among the valid runs. The Democrats then contest the game, asking that runs be counted because the players "intended" to touch the bases, even though they didn't. Of course, they only want to review the runs in the 3rd, 5th, and 7th innings, and only during their own at-bats. Even after selectively determining that certain non-counted runs should count, by looking at dimpled bags, they realize that they are still behind in the score. The Republicans appeal to the commissioner of baseball to stop the run recount. The Democrats complain that the owner of the stadium is the brother of the Republican manager. The Republicans complain that the umpires are Democrats. For six weeks, the country has no idea who won or lost the game. Many fans don't care which team won. Finally, the commissioner of MLB steps in and says that there was no uniform standard followed for recounting the runs. So, as has always been the case, the only runs that count are those runs where the players touched all the bases. Game over. Next season, the Democrats should sign up more intelligent players. Doug at 11:18 AM 12/9/2000 , Mark someone wrote: Since I knew the election would be close, I was ready to accept a President Gore if he had won the vote. He didn't. He lost the machine vote. He lost the first recount. He lost the second recount. The only one he lost was the machine vote. The other recounts were never completed. Now, if he is elected President after all this legal maneuvering, I will never accept his administration as legitimate. Neither will a vast majority of Americans. "vast majority"?? -- when he had 50+% of the popular vote? other countries, his actions are grounds for a violent revolution. Perhaps that won't happen here, but be prepared for some serious civil disobedience. Quite the opposite of what you thought. Here is the quote from my friend Luis KW of Lisboa: People around here (Europe) is amazed with the lack of independence of your Judges and Courts (Supreme, and Florida's). How can a Judge say (without laughing) that there's no use on recounting 10,000 or 11,000 doubtful votes, arguing it wouldn't change anything to the final result, when the difference among the candidates is under 400 votes???? I have seen the amazing printed ballots of Palm Beach. No wonder 19,000 voters made the same mistakes and double voted... it is too obvious that the ballot was mis-printed or so many people would not have made such a silly mistake. And what about the hundreds of Negroes that were unable to vote thanks to the State Militia? I think that if ALL the votes are not recounted, people all over the world will think that the new president was elected in cheated election. And the US will look like any other American banana's republic. Steve Great, Doug. Republicans keep claim about the "rules being changed". The rules at the start were that every registered voter has the opportunity to vote and their vote is to be counted. No, I don't think that it is right that "pregnant chads" be counted as votes. If somebody is so incompetent to not be able to push the tab at least half way (not 1/4 way) out then they should be voting through the mail, ahead of time. Republicans, led by Rush Limbaugh, talk all about those pregnant chads but ignore all the votes that were rejected by the machines that had two or three chads removed. According to the law in most states, including Florida and Texas, hand counts are to be used in the case of close votes. In testimony before the courts, a Bush expert even admitted that machine counts aren't best. Then Republicans call Democrats as not being democratic because of their using the courts to fight for the following the rules, as laid out before the vote started, counting all votes. Now the Republicans try to run out the clock so not all votes are counted. They call that democratic? They also protest the US Supreme Court, unless it's in their favor. If they don't like true democracy (or as close as we can get) and they aren't supportive of our system of checks and balances, they should find another country. Mark And that's where I think you are wrong, Steve. The rules at the start were that every registered voter has the opportunity to vote. But where is it a rule that every vote is to be counted? You yourself said that pregnant chads shouldn't be counted. So, are you already violating your rule? Undervotes and overvotes were counted--they were counted as no vote for president. Speaking of running out the clock, you know that if Florida misses the Dec. 12th deadline for certifying electoral college electors, Gore will win (since he has a majority of the remaining electors). So who has the motive to delay things through litigation? Not Bush. No one argues that people should not be allowed to vote. What we disagree upon is what should count as a vote. If the President vote is blank, but all other officers are chosen from a single party, does that mean the voter "meant" to vote for the presidential candidate of that same party? If there is a dimpled chad for president, but not on any other choices, does that count? If the chad is hanging by one, two, or three corners, should that count? (I think so). Herein lies the problem. What standards are we using to discern the intent of the unknown voter? We don't have any! Finally, why are we not concerned with any other state? There were thousands of ballots thrown out nationwide for exactly the same reasons. If you truly want every vote to count, let us hand count every vote in every state. We may get an accurate count in a year or so. Meanwhile, let's leave the presidency vacant. After all, I didn't notice any difference when the federal government shut down a few years ago, did you? :) P.S. Doug, how can you say that Gore has only lost once? The machine count had Bush the winner. Because the vote was so close, Florida law demanded a hand recount. Fine. But the parties argued over the deadline, the standards, and the locations of the hand recount. When the legal deadline for the recount passed, Bush was still in the lead. The Florida Supreme Court then extended the deadline. Some counties couldn't make it in time, but when the extended deadline passed, the election was certified. Bush had won again. That's three. Jeannie Dad, You seem to think Gore is some smart guy. What is his IQ? I seem to remember he didn't get high grades in college. Just because he got a degree doesn't mean he is smart. I know a lot of people who didn't do well in school but are very smart. Most of them are artists who march to a different beat. I see Gore as that kind of guy. Lionel Jeannie: Smart compared with Bush. Actually, grades don't equate with smarts. Some students are just lazy. "Knowledgeable" and "experienced" would be better adjectives than "smart," actually. He was an excellent member of Congress before he became vice-president. Have you seen Bush's resume? Dad Bill To me, "smart" means "a good comprehension of one's environment/surroundings." Add to that, "the ability to communicate that comprehension." Using those criteria, I see Gore way ahead of Bush. But then you add qualities such as honesty and integrity into the equation, and both candidates fail miserably, as do most politicians (and almost anyone in any kind of position of power). In other words, I don't think either one will be a president whom I, or most anyone else, can rally behind. It's too bad we can't require some sort of "intelligence, honesty and integrity" test of all prospective political candidates. But then, of course, we'd have a country without politicians! Wouldn't that be great!? But seriously, the only way to settle this vote tally problem to everyone's satisfaction is to do a manual recount of every disputed ballot. I can't believe that the Florida Supreme Court had the common sense to order exactly that (as I understand their ruling). Equally unbelievably, we then have the fairly obviously prejudiced U.S. Supreme Court coming in and contradicting Florida's decision, voting mostly along party lines, and throwing the whole thing back into confusion. I think Doug's Portuguese friend is right: the rest of the world probably won't respect our next president, whoever he is. Lionel Steve is absolutely right. Gore won the popular vote nationwide, and doubtless would have won the Florida popular vote if the Republicans hadn't schemed to prevent so many Blacks from voting. (He also would have won, of course, if Nader hadn't siphoned off 30,000 votes.) Excluding Florida, Gore is also ahead in the electoral votes, and would surely capture the Florida electoral vote if all the votes were counted. It's obvious to any objective observer that the Bush team has sought to delay that count until the deadline is past, thereby assuring Bush's victory. Mark has suggested that there will be demonstrations in the street if Gore wins. There should be demonstrations if Bush wins, for obviously he and his team have sought to steal the election (or, more properly, "robbed," since it was done openly.) Oh well, if Bush eventually is declared the winner, as I suspect he will be (albeit illegally), his presidency will provide rich fodder for the late-night comedians. Why do you suppose Bush has been kept hidden on his ranch out of view of the reporters, other than the fear that, like Reagan, being unable to say "good morning" without a cue card, he'd make an ass of himself every time he opened his mouth to speak without a teleprompter. If I sound bitter, I am. I don't want America to be the laughingstock of the world. Mark Come on, Lionel! Do you really think that America will be the laughingstock of the world because it elected a guy who might not be playing with a full deck? Looking at the past presidents, a lot of them strike me as average intellects. The smarter ones seem to be the ones who get us into more trouble (Wilson and the League of Nations, for example). And, in any case, aren't we already the laughingstock of the world for Clinton getting oral sex in the Oval Office from Monica Lewinsky, telling us he didn't inhale, eating Big Macs, or discussing his choice of underwear on MTV? Bush may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but I don't think he'll demean the office like Clinton did. Cheer up! At least the Bee will go back to its role as government watchdog with a Republican in the White House--a role it seems to have abandoned during the past 8 years while China was stealing our secrets. Lionel Laughing stock already? Not at all. Most countries don't care about the private lives of their leaders; they're more concerned that they have the ability to lead, and Clinton certainly has that. I don't recall Republicans being concerned when Republican Eisenhower was having an affair with his chauffeur, nor should they have been. Lionel George Bush Sr. was known to be having an affair the whole time he was in the White House, but the woman would not come forward, so there was no story. Reagan AND Nancy were having affairs. Clinton AND Hillary, ditto (Hillary's more female-oriented anyway). People who are having affairs are sleaze bags, that is well accepted as fact. The question is: can we afford to have a leader who's NOT a sleaze bag in a world full of sleaze bags? I think we should elect the sleaziest person possible. We have done that every time, except for Carter, and look what a mistake he was! Clinton is the sleaziest person ever to sit in the oval office, and look how we've prospered! Bush Jr. was brought up in a family of sleaze bags. Even though he is too dumb to be really innovative in that regard, I think we will be pleasantly surprised by a Bush presidency! Sure, he may not get into massive cocaine smuggling the way Reagan did, or rent out the US military to a small dictatorship in the middle east the way his dad did, but he is sure to come up with SOMETHING that will keep our economy perking along. Don't worry, be happy! Just hold your nose and smile! It's easy! Mark I don't know you [Luis], but I appreciate hearing your point of view. Let me respond to a few things, however. First of all, I don't think African Americans would appreciate being called Negroes. It isn't politically correct. And what evidence are you referring to? Just because Jesse Jackson gets on television to complain doesn't mean that there was "abuse of the Negroes' votes." You said that you were sure that most of the counters were Republicans. Wrong! In fact, most of the canvassing boards that began the recounts were Democrats. Only lately have there been representatives from both parties. And, in case you don't understand, if Florida fails to certify its electors, Gore wins the election with the majority of the rest of the electoral college. So who has the most to gain by recounting as slowly as possible? You also mentioned the prejudice of having Bush's brother as the governor of Florida. But you fail to mention the prejudice of having "Democratic" canvassing boards, and a "Democratic" Florida Supreme Court. Or do you not see that as equally prejudicial? If Republicans aren't to be trusted and are biased in favor of Bush, then why are Democrats similarly not to be trusted since they are biased for Gore? Finally, I don't have a problem with a foreigner talking about American elections. It is always good to get another perspective. But I also keep in mind the bias that foreigners may have. If Bush or Buchanan became President and decided to stop subsidizing European and other foreign countries, providing them with aid and military defense, I can see why some foreigners would prefer that Gore wins. So I take the comments of foreigners with a grain of salt. Luis You write with a great deal of good arguments. You should be on politics! :-) Sorry for my bad use of the English-American language. Here in Europe we don't have that usage of speaking P.C. We call the things by their names. And the Portuguese word "Negro" sounds nicer than the other one ("preto") meaning "black". That's why I used that word. What I was referring to was what people described while in line: black persons (is this more p.c.?) being pulled out of line and state militia demanding an impossible number of proofs of identification from the blacks. Those that tried to produce cards of ID were still told to "GO HOME" and get more proof of their identify (this was about 4 p.m). Then, about 5 p.m., these Florida militia police began stopping all cars on the highway that contained black persons on their way to the polls. These cars were held so long that the polls had closed before they could vote. In addition, several blacks were told they were "not registered" and their votes simply thrown in the garbage. I don't known if it is true or not, but it isn't a nice story to tell, is it? And the terrible thing is that it sounds pretty true... I didn't understand why counters stopped the recount long before the legal delay, when GWB was winning, arguing they would never have the time of recounting all the votes... unless they were willing GWB to win. Some hours later, GWB was declared winner in the State of Florida. I can't believe that the Florida Supreme Court is that "Democratic". Last Dec. 5 the Supreme Court in Florida has ruled against Gore, remember? And the clever last decision (recounting Every vote) was taken by the shortest majority of one vote (4 -- 3). The terrible thing is that your Justice is completely biased by politics. At least our Judges seem to be independent from Political Parties. Now, about foreign politics. That's exactly what we (the foreigners) are afraid of: the narrow-minded isolationists who think that World economy could develop closing the American borders. Subsidizing poor countries always had a counterpart, Mark. It could be a permission to introduce Coca-Cola and McDonalds in China, or making IBM's in Malaysia... America paid Portugal for the use of the Air base in Azores. The other side of the medal is that we suffered much more with the oil embargo (from Arab countries) than any other eastern country, because the Base was used to help the Israeli Army during the war (in the 60's). When it comes to American interests in the outside world, you acted like a falcon... why do you think we are all willing to have your Marines and submarines around? What we really want is to keep the borders open to trade and the minds open to world development. And please, don't think that every body is pro-Gore. It is just a question of fairness. He already got more than 50% of the ballots, and it seems that he should have won in Florida. I hope that your next President -- who ever he is -- wins the election fairly (counting the votes)... and not just in Court. Politics Pageby bill - 2008-01-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Has the FDA Lost Its Mind... Again?by admin - 2010-04-19 ( life / health / food / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: cherries and walnuts are not drugs Waxman Sneaks Anti Vitamin Amendment into Wall Street Reform Billby bill - 2010-05-18 ( life / health / politics ) [html version]Waxman represents L.A. on the west side up to Santa Monica. I bet those people take LOTS of supplements.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: naturalnews.com/028687_Henry_Waxman_health_freedom.html Obama's Sell Outby bill - 2010-05-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]A Bill Moyers show from a few months ago, but still worth watching. Rep. Alan Grayson Introduces the War is Making You Poor Actby bill - 2010-05-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Rep Alan Grayson Introduces the War Is Making You Poor Act May 21, 2010 -- Uploaded by Alan Grayson Grayson v. Broun on the Constitution ... Watch the Speech the Republicans Don't Want You to See Who Voted to Go Easy on the Oil Industryby bill - 2010-06-15 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]?This law set the foundation for the carelessness that caused the BP oil disaster:breakthematrix.com/latest/who-voted-to-limit-the-liability-of-oil-companies/ Vote Out Anyone Who Still Supports Israelby bill - 2010-06-15 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]The last straw was when they killed innocent peace activists on the Gaza flotilla. Anyone, such as that retard Joe "What's the big deal?" Biden, who still supports them has lost all touch with humanity and really needs to go ... to hell. Time for James Sensenbrenner to Goby bill - 2010-06-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]breakthematrix.com/latest/gop-lawmaker-with-bp-stock-has-role-in-spill-probe/ Time for John Boehner to Goby bill - 2010-06-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Funny how these "conservatives" want less government, but only when it's convenient for their corporate masters. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Time for Brad Sherman to Goby bill - 2010-06-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]This pinhead is calling the unarmed victims of Israeli aggression "terrorists?" It Has Long Been Time for Joe Lieberman to Goby bill - 2010-06-26 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The epitome of slime, of course, it's long BEEN time for Joe Lieberman to go:libertymaven.com/2010/06/22/loathsome-joe-liebermans-internet-kill-switch/10005/ --> Genetically-Engineered Food Right-to-Know Actby admin - 2010-06-29 ( life / health / food / politics ) [html version]Ask Your Congresspersons to Cosponsor HR 5577, Representative Kucinich's Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Take Action -- The above was copied from: The Killing Fields of Agribusiness #234, July 22, 2010, Health, Justice and Sustainability Newsfrom the Organic Consumers AssociationEdited by Alexis Baden-Mayer and Ronnie Cummins -- - also FreeDocumentaries.org Airing The World According to Monsanto Carl Levin, Warmongerby bill - 2010-07-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Time to go, Carl. Read here:afterdowningstreet.org/node/53604 Who is he trying to impress glaring down his long nose over those granny glasses, anyway? Help Randy Credico Oust Chuck Schumerby bill - 2010-07-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Here's fairly recent evidence of Schumer's lack of character/humanity:randycredico2010.org/?p=535 Blue Dog Democratsby bill - 2010-07-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The nickname is an insult to dogs. Vote out anyone of these people who voted for doctors while at the same time voting against the unemployed. Washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/01/AR2010060103831.html Never Re-elect Anyoneby bill - 2010-08-05 ( education / civics / politics / opinion ) [html version]Fresh start! Reboot! Recycle! Whatever you want to call it. Sure, the 5% who are good will have to find a real job for 2-6 years, but they can run again next time. It'll keep them from screwing up the economy because they know they will soon be back in it. It's the best way to stop the corruption, also known as "cronyism." Government (especially military) departmental heads (not just the Directors) need to be recycled in between every presidential election (straddling both administrations for basic functionality assurance). Election Guide for Election Hatersby bill - 2010-10-29 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Great Depression IIby bill - 2010-10-30 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]I guess they didn't call it The Great Depression during that depression, did they? We shouldn't be surprised they're not honestly calling this one Great Depression II. Or, in current parlance, maybe, G-Dep-2. It's "only" The Great Recession. As if those of us out of work (or in my case, "under-employed") and facing such dire uncertainty really care about semantics? The main problem for many unemployed is that they're depending on Corporate America to provide a job. Not gonna happen. These days, you have to fend for yourself, create a job/business for yourself. I see happening here what has already happened in Russia after the "collapse" of the Soviet Union. We, like them, are going to have to become a nation of hustlers. It's not a pretty picture, and I'm not advocating it, but it's probably unavoidable. If only we, like them, had leaders strong enough and wise enough to get rid of our own oligarchs. Don't get me started on "leaders." Don't depend on bank loans for your new business. Loans at interest are for fools. No offense. I'm still working my way through mortgage and credit card payments, at interest, so I suffer from the same foolishness as most everyone else. Do it the Muslim way -- no, I'm not Muslim -- and find investors, not blood-sucking bankers. Funny how vampires are so popular these days as we're surrounded by real life blood-suckers. In New Orleans Debate, Sen. Vitter Admits to Serious Sinsby admin - 2010-11-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/126193-sen-vitter-admits-to-serious-sins-in-new-orleans-debate Voting for a Resident of the Secretive C Street House?by bill - 2010-11-06 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]By Jeff Sharlet, The Huffington Post America's oldest and most influential Christian conservative political group doesn't publish voter guides or buy ad time or even make endorsements. For the Family, it's all about the relationships, the kind forged "beyond the din of the vox populi," as the group's founder put it-beyond the voice of the people. Is this Not Treason?by bill - 2010-11-17 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]By his own admission, Cantor appears to be a traitorous dumb ass: crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/his-own-standard-did-eric-cantor-just Stronger Magnifying Glass Neededby bill - 2010-11-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Previous argument/post, continued: FIRST POINT OF VIEW: Yes, it's an excellent justification for not paying attention to what is going on in politics right now. I think W. proved very nicely that they are NOT all alike, and not making even a small effort to select who might be a little less worse is abdicating one's responsibility as a citizen. The two-party corporate-dominated system that we have right now will not allow much change, but it makes it all the more important to do the best we can with what we do have, rather than whine "they are all alike" and go back to watching television. SECOND POINT OF VIEW: But it does take a higher power of magnifying glass to tell who's worse these days. Clinton was "less worse" than Bush, but Bush couldn't pass NAFTA, which Clinton happily did, as well as repealing Glass-Steagal and other economically ruinuous measures. Obama was less worse than Bush Jr, but Obama re-instituted the Patriot Act, passed corporate dream healthcare bill and escalated the Afghan war. So not voting is starting to look like a more viable option than getting tricked into supporting someone just because you voted for him, forgetting he was the "less worse" then, and still is not worth supporting or defending. I think it's part of what Noam Chomsky called "manufactured consent." Partisanship is NOT good citizenship. It is what allowed Bush Jr to balloon the deficit against the principles of many Republican Congressthings that knew better. It is what allowed Clinton to pass NAFTA. It is what is being used against the American people to carry out the corporate agenda. City Creates Alternate Banking System for Illegal Aliensby admin - 2010-12-05 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: judicialwatch Dems Pull Fast One with Food Safety Billby admin - 2010-12-16 ( life / health / food / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news233.htm Gov Kills Immigration Laws in Name of Economic Growthby bill - 2011-01-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Rhode Island's new governor has killed crucial measures to crack down on illegal immigration for the sake of statewide economic growth and prosperity in immigrant-rich areas. Just a few days on the job, Democrat Lincoln Chafee wasted no time issuing executive orders to accommodate illegal aliens, assuring that Rhode Island can grow economically by being a tolerant place to do business. He also took action so that immigrant-rich areas could prosper throughout the state, which has an estimated 40,000 illegal aliens mingled in its population of a little over 1 million. With a scribble on a paper Chafee rescinded a 2008 law requiring public agencies and vendors that do business with the state to use a federal databaseknown as E-Verifyto check the legal status of their workers. The governor also ordered Rhode Island State Police to stop participating in a federal program that allows officers to enforce immigration laws. The executive order calls the laws agents of divisiveness, incivility and distrust among the states citizens. Its simply part of the governors mission to create civil state with a vibrant, diverse community that is free of political, cultural and ethnic division. During his inauguration speech Chaffee vowed to implement an era of cultural and ethnic acceptance that will bring the state immediate prosperity. He took the opportunity to also say that his predecessors efforts to crack down on illegal immigration caused needless anxiety within our Latino community. The immigration laws were implemented to soften the huge financial toll that illegal aliens are having on Rhode Island taxpayers amid federal inaction. The Republican governor (Donald Carcieri) who enacted the measures said he was forced to because the flow of illegal immigrants had become epidemic and state taxpayers were getting stuck with the enormous tab. There were also serious concerns of escalating violence by illegal immigrants with criminal histories. The same year the immigration control laws were enacted, an illegal alien with an extensive criminal record kidnapped and raped a woman in Providence, despite his repeated encounters with local law enforcement officers for driving drunk and domestic assault. Had local authorities contacted federal immigration officials, the Guatemalan man would have been deported long ago. New House Watchdog Lets Obama Slide on Criminal Eventby admin - 2011-01-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/01/new-house-watchdog-lets-obama-slide-on-%e2%80%9ccriminal-event%e2%80%9d/ Feds Blow Off Recovering $643 Mil in Fraudulent Paymentsby admin - 2011-01-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: judicialwatch.org Feds Take Over School Bake Salesby bill - 2011-01-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The far-reaching tentacles of the bloated U.S. government will control a cherished public school fundraiserthe bake saleunder Michelle Obamas precious new law to combat childhood obesity. Signed this week by her husband, the $4.5 billion measure (The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act) is expected to revolutionize the inner-city diet by providing fresh produce and grilled lean meats as alternatives to greasy, fried foods that tend to be more popular in so-called food deserts. These are areasall low-incomedetermined by the government to be deficient in affordable healthy fare such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains and low-fat milk. Poor and at-risk children around the country will get free nutritious meals from U.S. taxpayers and the government will have the power to decide what exactly constitutes healthy cuisine. The law will also help communities establish local farm to school networks, create school gardens, and ensure that more local foods are used in the school setting. The idea is to slash greasy foods and extra calories by letting the government regulate what can be consumed on school grounds, including vending machines and at fundraisers. That puts bake sales on the chopping block. Under the new measure, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will decide if and when schools can have bake sales and the agency has the authority to ban them all together. After all, the USDA provides leadership on food, agriculture and natural resources based on sound public policy and science. No word yet on the results of any national bake-sale studies. The federal government should not be in the business of regulating this sort of activity at the local level, according to a national group that represents school board districts across the country. But the First Lady insists that government intervention is necessary when it comes to child nutrition because we cant just leave it up to the parents. Earlier this year Michelle Obama asserted that childhood obesity is a threat to national security. A few months later she declared war against French fries, advising restaurants to serve apple slices or carrots with hamburgers in lieu of the popular fried potato strips. Decision to Seize Control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Macby admin - 2011-01-29 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-asks-court-to-review-government-documents-on-decision-to-seize-control-of-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac/ Homeland Security Claims the Right to Take Your Valuablesby admin - 2011-02-07 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/52464-do-not-use-safety-deposit-boxes/#ixzz1CWy8y1SC The above link no longer works, but this page says it's b.s., anyway, assuming this page can be believed. :) Higher Percentage of Americans Believed in King Georgeby bill - 2011-03-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]During the Revolutionary War than Congress Today Us Officials Pushed Products Deemed Unsafe by Chinaby bill - 2011-03-15 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]U.S. officials pushed products deemed unsafe by China
So That's What They Mean by the War on Povertyby bill - 2011-03-26 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
So that's what they mean by the "War on Poverty" : Pharyngula. Only a Mitt Romney and Citizens Unitedby admin - 2011-06-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Mitt Romney and 'Citizens United' Intrepid Report.com
Top 10 Corrupt Politicians of (2010)by admin - 2011-06-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Top 10 Corrupt Politicians of 2010 ~ Economy Watch. Leaderless Resistanceby bill - 2011-06-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]... there will, no doubt, be mentally handicapped people out there who, while standing at a podium with an American flag draped in the background, and a lone eagle soaring in the sky above, will state emphatically in their best sounding red, white, and blue voice, "So what if the government is spying? We are not violating any laws." Read, listen or watch the rest here: Leaderless Resistance -- Nationalist Coalition Blog. Welfare for the Richby admin - 2011-07-10 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: dailybail.com/home/matt-taibbi-the-real-housewives-of-wall-street-how-morgan-st.html Why Borrow When You Can Print Your Own Money?by bill - 2011-08-09 ( life / money / politics ) [html version]Why is the US Government borrowing money at interest from a private bank (the Fed) when Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution allows the US Government to create its own money, interest-free? Great Anti-obama, Anti-stupidity Articleby bill - 2011-08-17 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Like I've been saying for years, this author agrees. Lesser evil voting has been one of the primary causes of the decline of American democracy ...globalresearch.ca Goldman Sachs Exec Working for Issaby bill - 2011-08-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Super Committee Members Super Corruptby bill - 2011-08-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Rick Perry's Gardasil Problemby staff - 2011-08-25 ( life / health / politics ) [html version]... his former chief of staff was a lobbyist for Merck and ... his chief of staff's mother-in-law ... was the state director of an advocacy group bankrolled by Merck ... Read, listen or watch the rest here
also.
Gardasil-and-Cervarix-dont-work-are-dangerous-and-werent-tested click here for related articles. See also: gardasil-vaccine-linked-to-record-birth-rate-declines/ Brzezinski Opens Upby bill - 2011-09-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]veteranstoday.com/2011/09/19/brzezinski-opens-up-the-last-american-cowboy/
Is this the Sanest Man Running for President?by bill - 2011-09-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]?Gary Johnson, Republican Presidential Candidate: Politics: GQ
Foreign Policy Hypocrisyby bill - 2011-10-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Copied from Liberty Underground:"Thirteen doctors and nurses who treated anti-government protesters during demonstrations in Bahrain earlier this year have been jailed for 15 years for crimes against the state. Seven other medical professionals were given sentences of between five and 10 years by a special tribunal that was set up during the emergency rule that followed the demonstrations," reports al Jazeera this morning. If Gaddafi had done this in Libya, the corporate media arm of the National Security State and our fascist State Department would be all over this story, headlined everywhere. Examining major headlines at ABC, CBS, and CNN, we found nothing about this major miscarriage of justice, but they did put the following among their major headlines this morning: ABC News: PHOTOS: Molly Sims Takes Stroll in Bikini; CBS News: Nancy Grace tweets flashing flap "evidence" (nipples were covered); CNN: Hillary Swank, dog kicked out of cafe. We found no statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who appears to be covering for the client state of Bahrain, and nothing on the State Department home page state.gov Times Sues Gov't for Refusing to Reveal Its Interpretation of Patriot Actby bill - 2011-10-17 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]What sort of democracy are we living in when the government can refuse to even say how it's interpreting its own law? That's not democracy at all
Read, listen or watch the rest here: NYTimes Sues The Federal Government For Refusing To Reveal Its Secret Interpretation Of The PATRIOT Act Techdirt. How the U.s. Gov't Secretly Reads Your Emailby admin - 2011-10-18 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: How the US Government Secretly Reads Your Email Link Between Earthquakes and Hydraulic Fracturingby admin - 2011-11-19 ( education / civics / politics / environment ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: U.S. Government Confirms Link Between earthquakes and "fracking". Down the Path of Increasingly Repressive Measuresby bill - 2011-12-06 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." -Harry S. Truman" Congress is Apparently Repealing the Constitutionby bill - 2011-12-07 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2021-06-18 23:55:39]Paul Craig Roberts: Congress is Repealing the Constitution : Information Clearing House
UPDATE: what else is new Gingrich Tried to Prevent Ron Paul's 1996 Return to Congressby bill - 2011-12-19 ( education / civics / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]Newt Gingrich tried to prevent Ron Paul's 1996 return to Congress Could You Pass a U.S. Citizenship Test?by bill - 2012-01-12 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Applicants must get 6 answers out of 10 in an oral exam to pass the test.Could you pass a US citizenship test? Trap Doors in New Hampshire Electionsby bill - 2012-01-13 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]SIX TRAP DOORS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTION PROCESS 1. Removed safeguards for its same-day registration system. 2. Ignores the law on ballot-stuffing safeguards 3. Breaks the chain of custody 4. Conceals vote-counting from the public, in violation of Article 32 of its own Constitution 5. Removed candidate recount rights 2009 6. Made it illegal for public citizens or members of the press to examine the ballots after the election is over 2003 Read, listen or watch the rest here: Black Box Voting : USA 1/12 -- AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT -. Ron Paul 2nd in Nh Democratic Primaryby bill - 2012-01-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Everybody already knows that Ron Paul placed second in the New Hampshire 2012 Republican Presidental Primary. But, at 7 o'clock tonight, the New Hampshire Secretary of State published the full results of the primary, including write-ins, and Ron Paul also won the #2 spot in the "Democratic" Primary. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Ron Paul #2 in NH
"Democratic" Primary! Democrats for Ron Paul. Who are the Idiots Voting for Mitt Romney?by bill - 2012-01-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Gov'track: Search Legislation in Congressby bill - 2012-01-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Here's Lieberman's trail of slime, for example:GovTrack: Search Legislation in Congress UPDATE: Here is a list of alternative search engines/sites: Newt Gingrich Promises Palin a Presidential Appointmentby bill - 2012-01-23 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]And Gingrich thinks he's the intellectual one among his competition
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Newt Gingrich Promises Palin a Presidential Appointment and Commits a Felony. Voters' Idea: Replace Congressby bill - 2012-02-02 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Voters' Idea: Replace Congress -- Washington Wire -- WSJ
Tennessee Begins to Push Back Against Ndaa Tyrannyby bill - 2012-02-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Some possible good news, for a change:
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Activist Post: Tennessee begins to push back against NDAA tyranny. --> Taxpayers Lose $1.3 Billion as Gov't Exits Chryslerby admin - 2012-02-10 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Taxpayers lose $1.3 billion as gov't exits Chrysler Result Not Even Close to the Actual Voteby bill - 2012-02-18 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]See RP Supporter Chairman of Belfast Maine Caucus Calls State GOP to Confirm Vote Tally, result "not even close" to the actual vote!
Judge Napolitano, How to Get Fired from Fox Business in Under 5 Minsby bill - 2012-02-18 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Judge Napolitano: how to get fired from Fox Business in under 5 mins Judge Napolitano -- How to get fired from Fox Business in under 5 mins. All I Wanted to Do was Voteby bill - 2012-02-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Indiana Official Worried About Voter Fraud Is Convicted of Voter Fraud
What If Democracy is Bunk?by admin - 2012-02-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: The Daily Bell -- What If Democracy Is Bunk? Virginia Declares Emperor Has No Clothes: Nullifies Ndaaby bill - 2012-03-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Virginia declares "emperor has no clothes": nullifies NDAA Good for Virginia! And it looks like Tennessee may follow suit. Part 1 Hungry for Changeby bill - 2012-03-15 ( culture / movies-tv-video / politics ) [html version]"This inspiring film has the power to transform your health!" -- Anthony Robbins, World Renowned Peak Performance Expert. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Hungry For Change -- Part 1. Mitt Romney is Goldman Sachsby bill - 2012-03-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]To call Mitt Romney a "Goldman" Boy is an understatement.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Paul Drockton. Mitt Romney IS Goldman Sachs Unplugging Americans from the Matrixby bill - 2012-04-29 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]... political "elites" represent only the powerful special interests that write the country's laws in exchange for funding the political campaigns of "lawmakers."
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Unplugging Americans from the Matrix The Thrive Movementby bill - 2012-05-10 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Great video ... and idea.
Bush Found Guilty of War Crimesby bill - 2012-05-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Bush Found Guilty Of War Crimes Too bad nothing will come of it, but it's nice to see, anyway
Roseanne Barr: Two Major Parties are Prostitutes for Big Moneyby admin - 2012-06-02 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here (prepare for so many popups, they'll cover the entire screen): Roseanne Barr on Presidential Run: Two Major Parties Are a Bunch of Prostitutes Who Work for Big Money Quote of the Day (6/25/2012)by admin - 2012-06-28 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Voltaire Good quote, but apparently not spoken by Voltaire. Read, listen or watch the rest here: answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid 120826085842AAwFmIv Lawmakers Got Inside Information During (2008) Financial Crisisby bill - 2012-07-03 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
34 Lawmakers Including Speaker Boehner Got Inside Informationby admin - 2012-07-03 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: 34 lawmakers -- including Speaker of the House John Boehner -- got inside information during the 2008 financial crisis and immediately changed their investment portfolios. The Two Party System Summed Up Nicelyby bill - 2012-07-08 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The Bain Legacyby bill - 2012-08-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]... the GOP presidential hopeful was a key architect of what has become known as the "Bain model." And as president, it can be expected that he would govern the country using the values that governed Bain Capital. see The Bain Legacy for the entire story
Greed and Debt, the True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capitalby bill - 2012-09-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]In light of Mitt Romney's resurfacing, a reminder: If you don't read it, it explains vulture capitalism and how Romney is the poster child for that. Basically,Romney borrowed millions (with little of his own money) from others to buy sick companies, such as KB Toys. Then somehow shifted those millions in debt onto the companies, and further looted the companies, driving them into bankruptcy and making millions for himself. Bain is similar to Carlyle Group, another famous vulture capital firm. Good reading.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829#ixzz25DjNA1e3 Mitt Romney, Monsanto Manby bill - 2012-09-18 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Introduced in the Bain years with Bain boosting, Roundup's supposedly "biodegradable" and "nontoxic" claims have led to false advertising findings in France and by the Attorney General of New York. Studies are also now beginning to link Roundup to cancer and birth defects, the first indication that it may be going the way of Lasso, another Monsanto herbicide endorsed by Bain that was forced from the market because of health hazards. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Mitt Romney, Monsanto Man
Putin Thanks Romney for Reckless Remarksby bill - 2012-09-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Further proof of Romney's stupidity.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Putin Thanks Romney For Reckless Remarks. This Guy is a Jokeby bill - 2012-10-02 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2021-06-06 23:59:25]Who's his national security advisor, Wile E. Coyote? Here is a timeline of "dire" warnings since 1979 Related articles here and here. Time to Include Third Partyby bill - 2012-10-08 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]CNN Poll: 47% Chose Neither After 2012 Presidential Debate! See Time To Include 3rd Party. Ya think? Hacking Democracy on Youtubeby admin - 2012-10-10 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
On the Subject of Tyrantsby admin - 2012-10-24 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Plato Free and Equal Presidential Debateby bill - 2012-10-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Free and Equal -- Presidential Debate. These candidates might discuss ACTUAL issues, not corporate-sponsored "issues." Here's Your Sign, Mr. Ryanby admin - 2012-10-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Appearing on CBS the next morning, Ryan told host Norah O'Donnell that he couldn't make sense out of the "horses and bayonets" line."
What an idiot. Texas Threatens to Arrest International Monitorsby bill - 2012-10-29 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]When the government remains [unresponsive] to egregious attempts to suppress the vote, such as mass mailings to ex-felons falsely telling them they are not allowed to vote, there certainly is a need for someone to step in to document the scandal and demand the issues be rectified. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Texas Threatens To Arrest International Monitors Sent To Watch US Election. Obama/Romney: Same Police Stateby bill - 2012-10-31 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Read, listen or watch the rest here: Obama, Romney same police state: Third party debate up-close (FULL VIDEO) Romney's Lax Regulation May Have Fueled Meningitis Outbreakby admin - 2012-11-06 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Romney's lax regulation may have fueled meningitis outbreak. Monsanto Funded Anti-gmo Labeling Campaignby bill - 2012-11-07 ( life / health / food / politics ) [html version]Corporate scum at their worst, or is this merely typical?
Free and Equal Fighting for a More Equal Election Processby admin - 2012-11-07 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Free & Equal -- Fighting for a more equal election process. Rolling Jubileeby bill - 2012-11-17 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Great idea!
Russia Ousts U.S. NGOs, Fake Protests Peter Outby admin - 2012-12-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Activist Post: Russia Ousts Meddling US NGOs, Fake Protests Peter Out. Replace "treason" with "terrorism" and this is EXACTLY what Obama has been doing! How's that for hypocrisy? Fooling Themselvesby bill - 2012-12-29 ( culture / writing / blog / politics ) [html version]The "elites" are adept at fooling themselves and others into thinking they know best. The superiority they bestow upon themselves is a convenient justification for keeping us "commoners" in the dark, and themselves in power. Major Food Companies Consider Lobbying for Gmo Labelingby bill - 2013-02-07 ( life / health / food / politics ) [html version]Maybe there is hope for mankind, after all? Thanks to the boycotts, and more people refusing to remain ignorant? Whatever the reason, this looks promising. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Activist Post
Chris Hedges Quoteby admin - 2013-02-11 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Chris Hedges Don't forget judges, CEOs and "regulatory" agencies! We Need a New Sherman Antitrust Actby bill - 2013-02-11 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]We need a new Sherman Antitrust Act! (or enforce the one we've got). Limit, by statute, the allowed size of any company. Having too much of the economy controlled by too few corporations translates out to not enough jobs! Screw "economies of scale!" It's actually less efficient in the greater scheme of things if no one has a job/income with which to purchase our own products. Bob Woodward Criticizes Obamaby bill - 2013-03-03 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]If Bob Woodward Criticizes Obama, that's actually in Obama's favor in my opinion, though I'm not a fan of either oone. Liberty Versus Securityby bill - 2013-03-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]I like this graphic showing this nation's descent into totalitarianism No Deal on Backs of Elderly, Children, Sick and Poorby bill - 2013-03-23 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]We demand a budget that makes sure that the wealthiest Americans and most profitable corporations pay their fair share. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Send a Message to President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker John Boehner: No Budget Deal on the Backs of the Elderly, the Children, the Sick and the Poor. Friends of Bernie Sanders. Why is Socialism Doing So Darn Well in Deep Red North Dakota?by bill - 2013-04-05 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Public "social" banking works, even for otherwise "conservative" people.Why Is Socialism Doing So Darn Well in Deep-Red North Dakota?
The Psychology of the Powerfulby bill - 2013-04-07 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Instead of analysing actions, checking through the consequences of those actions and chatting through the decisions made, leaders too often rely on impulsive decision-making -- and this is when hubris can set in. Read, listen or watch the rest here: . This describes almost every decision-maker I've ever met in a corporate setting
Bitcoin Vs. Big Gov'tby bill - 2013-04-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Nice!
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Bitcoin vs. Big Government Anger Builds in Illinois at Bain's Latest Outsourcing Planby bill - 2013-04-15 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]'I'm sick to my stomach': anger builds in Illinois at Bain's latest outsourcing plan
Why is Boston Terrorism but Not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?by bill - 2013-04-27 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?Glenn Greenwald asks in his latest column, "Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?" Can it be because the suspects in this one are Muslim? Can only Muslims commit terrorism? What have we become? -- LUV News Has the U.s. War on Terror Just Had Its Cronkite Moment?by bill - 2013-06-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]PRISM looks like that Cronkite moment: The moment when even the staunchest Obama supporter admits they've been taken for a ride. Read, listen or watch the rest here: rt.com/op-edge/war-terror-cronkite-moment-457 Revealing NSA Spying Program Doesn't Harm National Securityby bill - 2013-06-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Terrorists Already Knew about the Programs The Only People Who Were Kept In the Dark Were the American People Read, listen or watch the rest here: Top Counter-Terrorism Czar: Revealing NSA Spying Program DOESN'T Harm National Security Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, are Dangerous and Weren't Tested Properlyby staff - 2013-06-25 ( life / health / politics ) [html version]
also.
click here for related articles. See also: gardasil-vaccine-linked-to-record-birth-rate-declines/ 12 Real Patriots Brave Enough to Fight for Truth and Justiceby bill - 2013-07-08 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]12 Real Patriots Brave Enough to Fight for Truth and Justice
Conspiracy Theorists Sane, Gov't Dupes Hostileby bill - 2013-07-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Told ya! :)
Read, listen or watch the rest here: New studies: 'Conspiracy theorists' sane; government dupes crazy, hostile. How to Know If Your Co-worker is a Threat to National Securityby admin - 2013-07-20 ( culture / humor / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: How to know if your coworker is a threat to national security The Jobs Number is B.s. Says Former Head of Blsby bill - 2013-07-23 ( life / money / employment / politics ) [html version]The Jobs Number Is BS Says Former Head Of BLS
Wouldn't It Just Be Easier to Change Our Foreign Policy?by admin - 2013-07-23 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Wouldn't It Just Be Easier to Change Our Foreign Policy?. Lawmakers Who Allowed NSA Phone Spying Received Double the Cashby admin - 2013-08-02 ( education / tech / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Lawmakers Who Upheld NSA Phone Spying Received Double the Defense Industry Cash Feds Give Laid-off Boeing Workers a Helping Handby bill - 2013-08-05 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The Labor Department ruling also means that if laid-off Boeing workers need to travel, say to California, for a job interview, the government will reimburse 90 percent of the costs. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Feds give laid-off Boeing workers a big helping hand ~ Business & Technology ~ The Seattle Times
Retarded People Running Thingsby bill - 2013-08-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Obama himself says, "The odds of dying in a terrorist attack are a lot lower than they are of dying in a car accident." And he's right, for a change. Yet he/they want us all to be constantly afraid of this bogeyman, these nebulous "terrorists," which nowadays includes just about everyone. I get tired of retarded people -- emotionally and morally, if not mentally -- running the world, and the gullible people who fall for their lies and become their enforcers/enablers, wittingly or not. Ruling "Elite" Destroying Our Economiesby bill - 2013-08-29 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]... on purpose, is what he seems to be implying without saying so in so many words. Constitution Banned on Constitution Dayby admin - 2013-09-25 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
ABombazine: WTF?? Constitution Banned on Constitution Day in California. Why War with Russia is Unavoidable, Unlessby admin - 2013-10-02 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Israel Threatens to Go It Alone Against Iranby bill - 2013-10-06 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]I hope they do. Maybe then we'll be rid of them once and for all. Israel has been screaming since 1985 that Iran is just "months away" from nuclear weapons. Simple Reform Could Save America from Wall Streetby bill - 2013-10-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Chris Hedges Imploding the Myth of Israelby admin - 2013-11-29 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Chris Hedges: Imploding the Myth of Israel. The Fallacy of Lesser Evil Choiceby admin - 2013-12-05 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: OpEdNews -- Article: The Fallacy of "Lesser-Evil" Choice. Icelanders Overthrow Gov't and Rewrite Constitution After Banking Fraudby admin - 2013-12-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: guardianlv.com/2013/12/icelanders-overthrow-government-and-rewrite-constitution-after-banking-fraud-no-word-from-us-media We Stopped Sopa, Let's Stop the Tppby admin - 2014-01-11 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: We Stopped SOPA -- Lets Stop the TPP. Putin-style Politics Could Be What Saves U.sby bill - 2014-01-22 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]I used to think Putin was a thug/autocrat [I should say I assumed he must be], but that's what it takes sometimes. That being said, he does seem to have Russia's (and his own) interests at heart. I like what he's done to the oligarchs internally and his management of the Russian ship of state internationally ... so far, especially regarding Syria and Crimea
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Putin-Style Politics Could Be What Saves U.S. The Architects of Free Trade Really Did Want a World Gov'tby bill - 2014-02-25 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Why I Am Burning My Last Bridge with Obamaby bill - 2014-03-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]She pretty well sums it up! Read, listen or watch the rest here: Why I'm burning my last bridge with Obama. Sc State Senate Nullifies Hemp Banby bill - 2014-03-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Activist Post: S.C. State Senate Unanimously Nullifies Federal Hemp Ban. Good news! This is a wonderful natural resource that's been made illegal by whores beholden to the above-mentioned industries. Another hemp-related article here: thespiritscience.net/2016/06/22/henry-ford-made-a-hemp-car-in-1941-but-no-one-knows-about-it/ Us is An Oligarchy Not a Democracy, Says Scientific Studyby bill - 2014-04-21 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]US is an oligarchy not a democracy, says scientific study Of course, astute observers have known this for years. Still, it's nice to see it "officially" recognized. Then again, this country NEVER WAS a democracy, it's a republic. An actual democracy would have everyone voting on everything, which is what we need more than anything else to help combat our current corrupt/stupid government officials. The World According to Time Magazineby bill - 2014-05-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The World According to TIME Magazine. For those who still read TIME magazine. Let Us Vote Whether Money is Speechby bill - 2014-06-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]The Supreme Court's decisions to let the rich buy as many politicians as they want are outrageous. Pass SB 1272 to demand a Constitutional amendment that overturns Citizens United and McCutcheon -- and that says once and for all that corporations aren't people, and money isn't speech. The Whys Behind the (u.s. Puppet) Ukraine Crisisby staff - 2014-09-09 ( education / civics / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: The Whys Behind the Ukraine Crisis Putin on Russian Cultureby bill - 2017-01-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Long article (transcript) of Putin speech from 2013. Too long to read now, so this is essentially a bookmark: Grim false Depiction of Russian Lifeby admin - 2017-08-13 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Grim [false] depiction of Russian life Remove Dogfight-Supporting Moron, Steve Kingby bill - 2017-09-16 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]What a pinhead.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: thepetitionsite.com/774/802/232/steve-king-supports-dog-fights-he-must-resign/. Flipping Off Trumpby bill - 2017-11-20 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]I'm working on an arrangement with my employer whereby I flip off Trump's motorcade, get photographed doing it, get fired for it, then have a "go fund me" campaign pay me $100K. Wish me luck! THIS JUST IN: Woman who flipped off trump motorcade wins election Merck Accused of Fraud Re Gardasilby staff - 2018-06-09 ( life / health / politics ) [html version]They failed to clearly state.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: greenmedinfo.com also.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Gardasil-and-Cervarix-dont-work-are-dangerous-and-werent-tested click here for related articles. See also: gardasil-vaccine-linked-to-record-birth-rate-declines/ Judge Brett Kavanaughby bill - 2018-09-29 ( education / civics / politics / legal ) [html version]Just thought I'd put some click bait out there with the words Judge Brett Kavanaugh in it to see if it generates any hits. UPDATE: It didn't. :( Autism Linked to Aluminum Adjuvantsby admin - 2018-10-07 ( life / health / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: aluminum-vaccine"s-cause-autism click here for related articles. Israel Lobbyby bill - 2018-11-06 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]Watch the film the Israel Lobby didn't want you to see. Good Explanation of the Annexation of Crimeaby admin - 2018-11-13 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
The world knows that Russia did not annex Crimea. [see politically-correct version here] Perhaps you are having a difficult spell of SMD, (selective memory disorder), so let me re-orient you to 2014 in my exclusive way-back machine. This was the year when the duly-elected president of Ukraine, Yanukovych, was deposed in a US/World Bank coup [see also how and why], thrown under the proverbial bus, and Poroshenko was installed as President. You might remember (or most probably don't) that even President Barak Obama, made a very public announcement in an interview that the US was definitely a part of that coup. [See Obama admits US complicity in Kiev coup and President Obama admits to US complicity in Kiev Coup] You probably do not know, Mr. President, that Crimea had been part of Russia until Russian President Nikita S. Khrushchev annexed it to Ukraine in the late 50s, as he himself was Ukrainian. Well, the Crimeans understood very clearly that there was no true representative in Kiev to whom they could turn. So they did something amazing. They voted, in a free and fair referendum, to ask the Crimean people if they wanted to stay with Ukraine, or petition the Russian Federation to join it, and overwhelmingly, the Crimean people voted to ask to join the Russian Federation, and their petition was granted. You may recall, sir, that the US is a signatory to the UN Charter, which guarantees people the right to peaceful-self-determination; this is precisely what the Crimean people did, yet the US government refuses to accept what the Crimean people have done here. Attempting to punish Russia for something it absolutely did not do, and lying about what really went down, makes the optics on this new sanctioning look really ugly, and punishing countries for what they have not done, is a very ugly way of having to deal with blowback. Russia-gate Explainedby bill - 2019-04-08 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2022-08-11 02:03:25]This pretty well sums up the stupidity known as "Russia-gate": russiagate cartoon. And, can we please stop adding "gate" to the end of every scandal? Millennials are too young to remember Watergate, the original "gate." Thank you for your cooperation. World's Oldest Pm to Youngest: Listen to Old People & Hold onto Idealismby bill - 2019-12-17 ( life / help / advice / politics ) [html version]Malaysian leader Mahathir Mohamad, the world's oldest prime minister, has offered the world's youngest, Finland's Sanna Marin, some words of wisdom as she takes on her new role: Ask "old people" for their advice. Read, listen or watch the rest here: mahathir-marin-finland-advice Israel Lobby Conby bill - 2020-03-19 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]Looks like a worthy cause for the sake of world peace.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Israel Lobby Con The PPP is Letting Our Small Restaurants and Businesses Dieby admin - 2020-04-27 ( culture / food / restaurants / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: news.yahoo.com See also: The PPP Is Letting Our Small Restaurants And Businesses Die -- Does Science Justify Closing Bars And Restaurants? No. -- NYC Restaurants To Ban Cuomo From Dining Political Compass Testby admin - 2020-05-05 ( culture / writing / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: politicalcompass.org My score -- as of May 1 (May Day), 2020 -- was "left, libertarian." Benjamin Franklin Quotesby admin - 2020-05-07 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]Trump Hammers Cuba While Cuba Cures the Sickby admin - 2020-06-23 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: mintpressnews.com/trump-sanctions-cuba-while-cuba-battles-coronavirus-world/268592/ Two Very Bad Turns of Eventsby don - 2020-06-25 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]They're pulling down American statues because it's another color revolution, Soros's specialty. On 6/23/20 4:57 PM: It is astonishingly bad: Tearing Down Monuments Tucker: Why mobs are tearing down America's monuments. This is not a momentary civil disturbance. This is a serious and highly organized political movement. DNC Whistleblower: Joe Biden Will NOT Be The Democratic Nominee -- The Clover Chronicle On Saturday, an alleged whistleblower who works "in a job closely tied to the DNC but not directly for them" took to an anonymous forum and shared some information related to 2020 presidential hopeful Joe Biden's electability: "Biden is not the real candidate. U.S. & Russia Not Enemies Despite Existing Disagreements -- Russian Ambassadorby admin - 2020-07-14 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: rt.com/newsline/494228-us-russia-relations-ambassador/ Good News from Washington: AIPAC, Israel Losing to Progressive Democratsby admin - 2020-07-23 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: mintpressnews.com/aipac-israel-losing-to-progressive-democrats/269500/ Two-tiered Medicine: Why is Hydroxychloroquine Being Censored and Politicized?by admin - 2020-08-09 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: wakingtimes.com/2020/07/31/two-tiered-medicine-why-is-hydroxychloroquine-being-censored-and-politicized/ Help Stop Gov't Overreachby bill - 2020-08-29 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]This man and his organization are suing the governor of Tennessee for unconstitutional overreach in reaction (over-reaction) to this so-called "pandemic." As I keep saying, where is the emergency? One sixth of one percent dying from something (and even those numbers are questionable) does not constitute an epidemic, let alone a "pandemic." See also: Help Stop Gov't Overreach Bill Hicks Quoteby admin - 2020-09-29 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Bill Hicks Leaked Documents Expose Massive Anti-Syria Propaganda Operation Waged by Western Gov'ts and Mediaby admin - 2020-10-01 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: sott.net George Orwell Quotesby admin - 2020-10-03 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-10-28 04:36:34]After Chinese Scientists Steal Billions in American Research, U.S. Finally Bans Communistsby admin - 2020-10-12 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-10-20 06:31:06]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/after-chinese-scientists-steal-billions-in-american-research-u-s-finally-bans-communists/ Psychopaths Among Usby bill - 2020-10-26 ( culture / people / politics ) [html version]"Politicians are more likely than people in the general population to be sociopaths. I think you would find no expert in the field of sociopathy/ psychopathy/ antisocial personality disorder who would dispute [that] a small minority of human beings literally have no conscience -- but it does explain a great many things, shamelessly deceitful political behavior being one." -- Dr. Martha Stout, clinical psychologist and former instructor at Harvard Medical School Trump Rewards Army of Fans After They Defy Governor's Order Limiting Outdoor Rally to 250by bill - 2020-11-04 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: bizpacreview.com Are You Still Voting for Biden?by bill - 2020-11-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]You might want to read this first: Tara Reade exposes truth
And then, of course, there's all of the proven corruption involving China and Ukraine. But, yeah, go ahead and stick your head back into the sand. The U.S.A. is Now Truly a Banana Republicby bill - 2020-11-09 ( education / research / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]The USA is now officially, if we were not already, a banana republic. The Democrats have stolen the 2020 presidential election. Trump was leading in quite a few states (AZ, GA, NC, WI, MI, PA) and it looked like it was just a matter of time before those states were announced in his favor. But then, lo and behold, the counts went the other way, and Biden was deemed the prospective winner. I guess they finally got even for what happened in 2000? If you are too young to remember that, look it up. I wonder if Hillary is upset they didn't go to such extremes on her behalf four years ago? Anyway, maybe it's time for me to move to one of the former banana republics? I've heard good things about Costa Rica and Dominican Republic. I just need to find one that is not going along with the covid lie. You know, one that knows there is no "pandemic". Biden Uses the Hammer and Scorecard to Winby admin - 2020-11-12 ( education / research / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: biden-using-scorecard-and-the-hammer-to-steal-another-u-s-presidential-election-just-like-obama-and-biden-did-in-2012 UPDATE: This says the "hammer and scorecard" angle is false. Not the fraud entirely, just that one piece of the story. Ms Gov Not Going to Participate in Biden Regime Lockdown Schemeby bill - 2020-11-18 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2021-06-17 04:36:45]Read, listen or watch the rest here: conservativedailypost.com I might have to move to Mississippi... if Biden
UPDATE: Good for them! No Massive Fraud? 1994 Precedent: Vote-Fraud Ruling Shifts PA Senateby admin - 2020-11-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-11-21 04:24:11]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: sott.net/article/444327-No-massive-fraud-February-1994-precedent-vote-fraud-ruling-shifts-Pennsylvania-Senate-absentee-ballots-ALL-rejected What Trump Has Accomplishedby bill - 2020-11-21 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Someone on Twitter gave a long list of what Trump has accomplished while in office. I appreciate that because I keep forgetting what he's good for, exactly. Anyway, I took his list and removed what probably would have happened without Trump, as well as things I don't consider to be especially good. At least, not how they were done. Here is my edited list, with question marks after the ones I'm still not sure of, and exclamation points after the ones I'm very happy about: Map of House of Representatives Votingby bill - 2020-11-23 ( education / civics / politics / fraud ) [html version]Read, listen or watch the rest here: Map of House of Representatives voting And we're supposed to believe all of these Republican voters voted for Biden? In a related story, here's an article about the Dominion voting systems engineer who claims to have rigged it himself. Greater Idahoby bill - 2020-11-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]This (below) is great. Will probably never happen, but wouldn't it be great if counties could secede from one state and join another... as long as they're connected? Here are a couple of renderings: here and here. Of course, if that did happen, Oregon might as well just join Washington. And don't forget the State of Jefferson initiative, which has been a legitimate movement for years now. Governors Have Way Too Much Powerby bill - 2020-11-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2022-03-26 16:13:40]If there is one thing we learned this year, it should be this: Governors have WAY too much power. Actually, the entire top-down governance model needs to go. UPDATE: And now, in light of the "supply chain issues," I'd say EVERYONE in charge of ANYTHING that affects our way of life has way too much power. We need alternatives to everything now. UPDATE: See How To Ensure Lockdowns Cannot Happen Again The Steal was Massive. Expert Reveals How Thousands of Trump Votes Were Shifted to Bidenby admin - 2020-11-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-11-24 23:50:08]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-steal-massive-expert-reveals-hundreds-thousands-trump-votes-shifted-biden-election-night/ Obama Attacks Jewish Money, Power in New Memoirby bill - 2020-11-24 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-11-24 21:15:27]Obama's tough-on-Israel stance was quite possibly his only policy I agreed with. Read, listen or watch the rest here: Obama's new book
Hilarious Memes About Lockdownsby admin - 2020-11-27 ( culture / humor / covid / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: powerlineblog.com UPDATED: And here's one about rioting: Best anti-riot memes What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Wonby admin - 2020-11-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: spectator.org/what-we-must-believe-to-believe-biden-won/ Here is the Evidence of 2020 Vote Fraudby bill - 2020-11-28 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Here's a sample of submitted evidence. Their page takes a while to load
Read, listen or watch the rest here: here is the evidence WV Governor Forced to Back Down on Draconian Rulesby bill - 2020-11-30 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]West Virginia's attorney general said:
Read, listen or watch the rest here: citizens stand up to threats of arrest Mask Policies, State by Stateby bill - 2020-11-30 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]See also life/health/covid. Of the thirteen states where masks are NOT mandatory, state-wide, all but one of them has a Republican governor. Coincidence? I don't think so. Sources: washington examiner and wikipedia
See also... Adlai Stevenson Quoteby admin - 2020-12-01 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Adlai Stevenson Today, it's the cloak of a bad flu bug called covid-19. Christian Josi (Columnist) Quoteby admin - 2020-12-01 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Christian Josi This was actually just a headline, but I thought it was great all by itself. Read, listen or watch the rest here: pjmedia.com Aldous Huxley Quotesby admin - 2020-12-11 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]Solzhenitsyn Quotesby admin - 2020-12-12 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world. -- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn NYC Restaurants to Ban Cuomo from Diningby bill - 2020-12-25 ( culture / food / restaurants / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2020-12-25 19:48:27]Serves him right! No pun intended.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Cuomo banned See also: The PPP Is Letting Our Small Restaurants And Businesses Die -- Does Science Justify Closing Bars And Restaurants? No. -- NYC Restaurants To Ban Cuomo From Dining One Man's Response to the Incident at the Capitolby bill - 2021-01-12 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]One man's response (as a comment on YouTube) to the January 6, 2021 incident at the Capitol in Washington, DCby Seventeen Raccoons I was at the DC rally, first Trump spoke at the Ellipse and at the end of the speech said "Let's all walk down to the Capitol" So we all begin walking down Pennsylvania Ave, it was fun, they had a giant American flag that people were holding and we chanted and sang on our way to the Capitol. Thousands of people were gathered on the grass in front of the building. As I approached that area I noticed there were a lot of Antifa guys there, who were not really dressed like trump supporters, many of them wore olive drab military style clothing had helmets and gas masks (when was the last time Trump supporters brought gas masks and helmets to a rally?) They were organized, a guy in his fifties was in charge of the group and were in the process of scaling a wall in order to get behind the police line that were positioned at the steps. The guy in charge was yelling to his guys to scale the wall to get behind the Capitol Hill police line which were to the left blocking the stairs. After a few guys got teargassed that reached the top, the guy in charge had his guys confront the police line at the steps when within a few minutes the police retreated and we all had access to the stairs. At this point hundreds of us went up the stairs to the Capitol building and had gathered, mostly just yelling chants and singing but within a few minutes the Antifa guys began smashing windows. I was screaming at them to stop but there were at least 20-30 antifa guys and they were on a mission to enter the building. Well, they got a window open and few went in, more tear gas, then a Capitol Hill cop appeared inside standing by the door (had a glass window) with a cell phone recording/taking pictures and within a minute or two after he left, the door popped open and now a several antifa guys were there encouraging Trump supporters to enter the building. Well, about 100 people went inside. I saw what was happening and wanted no part of it and exited stage left. Gandhi Quotesby admin - 2021-01-16 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]
When asked his opinion of Western civilization, he said, "I think it would be a good idea." -- Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi Amazon Admits In-Person Voting is the Only Way to Goby bill - 2021-01-28 ( education / civics / politics / voting ) [html version]How ironic! I wonder if they'll have their Twitter and Facebook accounts suspended for saying so?
Read, listen or watch the rest here: theblaze.com So, What Can We Each Do to Take Back Our Country?by doug - 2021-01-29 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]Barring a miracle, maybe from the declassifications including Obamagate and 9/11 (if that is even true), we have to do more and spread the word to the American patriots to make positive changes.
If you can think of more things and comment, I may add your ideas. Feel free to share this with anyone. We need to take control. Read, listen or watch the rest here: mewe.com Do You Love Oxygen? Support Our Bill Just Filed, Sb 0320by bill - 2021-01-29 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]
As Gov't Demands Our Trust, Here are Multiple Examples of the State Endangering Public Healthby bill - 2021-02-02 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]This is what happens when you blindly trust "officials." For your own sake, don't be so stupid/trusting
They Want You Dumb and Dependentby admin - 2021-02-02 ( education / civics / politics / opinion ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: milo.net Sucks to Be Canadian Right Nowby staff - 2021-02-03 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]Some might say it ALWAYS sucks to be Canadian. Anyway... Here's what Trudeau has done now: "Today, travel restrictions to and from Canada have taken an even more draconian turn for the worse. It's important to watch Trudeau because what he does is what the Dems in this country WANT to do. Deep Insider Says Trump's Advisors Deliberately Ran Out the Clock to Cover Up Election Theftby admin - 2021-02-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50405 The CDC Keeps Overstepping Its Charterby bill - 2021-02-06 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]Since when does the CDC have any authority/control over anyone? They are not a government agency but a private organization with close government ties. All they can legally do is give advice. And that, lately, has been less than worthless. From someone online in response to this latest b.s.: CDC Announces All Travelers (on public transport) Must Wear Two Masks, Threatens Arrest
Thomas Jefferson Quotesby admin - 2021-02-07 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2022-10-03 14:08:50]Stand Against Tyrannyby bill - 2021-02-07 ( education / tech / internet / politics ) [html version]It worked against apartheid South Africa. Let's hope it works against other tyrants, in this case tech tyrants
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Accuracy in Media Thomas Sowell Quotesby admin - 2021-02-12 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]Racism is not dead, but it is on life support -- kept alive by politicians, race hustlers and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as 'racists.'" Some of the biggest cases of mistaken identity are among intellectuals having trouble remembering that they are not God." -- Thomas Sowell George Washington Quoteby admin - 2021-02-15 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- George Washington Harry Truman Quoteby admin - 2021-02-15 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Harry S. Truman Various Political Quotesby admin - 2021-02-17 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Frederick Douglas -- Steven Biko -- Morpheus -- Dr Seuss -- George Orwell -- Upton Sinclair -- John Loeffler Stalin Quoteby admin - 2021-02-20 ( culture / quotes / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]-- Josef Stalin Balfour Declaration Declared Invalidby bill - 2021-02-27 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version]A hundred years too late, and nothing will come of it, but it's nice to see
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Court invalidates Balfour Declaration, holds UK responsible for Palestinian plight Does this Concern Anyone?by admin - 2021-03-01 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]
Read the rest of this article at RightWingGranny.com Excellent Interview of Sidney Powell by Dinesh D'souzaby doug - 2021-04-08 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Excellent interview of Sidney Powell by Dinesh D'Souza on 3 Apr 2021 She is very disappointed in Trump. See why. Here is the link to all of his videos. Just scroll down a little to see a 4-part series I think if you voted for Trump, you will really like this interview. Gun Laws are Changingby staff - 2021-04-13 ( education / civics / politics / guns ) [html version]Yippee! This will really piss off the Dems. newsmax.com/newsfront/guns-tennessee/2021/04/08/id/1016890/ On 4/8/21, Bill someone wrote: So, according to the article, there are already 30 states that don't require a gun permit, and 20 of those allow permitless concealed carry? I'm surprised it's so many. On 48/21, anonymous replied: It's becoming a movement in the red states. Don't even need a background check now. Of course, the elite may decide to install a Dem as the next governor and un-do it. So take that $1400 check from Biden and buy your handgun now. Desantis Sues Cdc Over Their Power Grabby bill - 2021-04-15 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]The CDC has no power other than the power of suggestion.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: trendingpolitics.com/desantis-sues-cdc-in-major-challenge-to-agencys-sweeping-covid-power-grab/" World War 3 Started in 2020, but Did You Even Notice?by doug - 2021-04-16 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]The title of Dr. Vernon Coleman's latest video inspired me to write this today. Find him on Brand New Tube -- simply an awesome soul. The two prior world wars involved older technology and were guns and bombs. This war may morph into that, especially if the globalists who profit from wars get their way. But for now, this is a war on humanity. It is not a war between countries. It's a war to enslave humanity and there are almost countless attacks of all types -- psychological, pharmaceutical, food, air, water, and often there are pawns who really do shoot people, i.e. Antifa or Black Lives Matter's useful idiots. But ask "the man on the street" whether we are at war and I would guess most answers would be a bewildered "no" which make them question the sanity of the person asking. This is because it started off as a psychological war. Almost at the same time it started as a biological attack. Most would assume I mean the dreaded "covid-19" but that is more of the psychological aspect because it's not even real. They are using the threat that it's real [in order] to cause panic. The panic is spread by the media and has been so incredibly successful that the victims of the panic are lining up to save their lives. How will they be saving their lives? This is where the biological aspect of the war comes in -- the fraudulent "cure" called the "covid-19 vaccinations" which do nothing for health other than destroy it. At this point, there will be fear victims who will attack me for what I claim above. This is the genius of the slave masters (or as Dr. Coleman calls them "conspiracy perpetrators") -- they turn their victims into comrades in arms who are nothing more than completely duped and useful idiots. Rather than investigating or even just noticing their rights vanishing before their very eyes, they parrot the scripts handed out to all media by the globalists and try to justify why they are wearing not 1 but often 2 or 3 masks in a false sense of safety from the make believe virus. They refuse to notice that there are no more deaths from the 2019/2020 or the 2020/2021 flu seasons than in any prior years. They don't grasp that these genius globalists found a way to rebrand the yearly flu into a "pandemic" and call it by their new name "covid-19" (some clever thinkers call it more accurately "covid-1984" in reference to George Orwell's book that foretold what we are experiencing today). The planning for this war is simply staggering in its complexity. It has been planned for literally decades. So in some respects the war began decades ago -- surely by the 1960s when outdated and fraudulent science about our immune systems convinced President JFK to sign the vaccine act to target the health of the population, create the CDC to make people believe the government has your best interests in mind, put fluoride into the water to dumb down the population, and not least, the CIA's mind control techniques were perfected. The world population became dumb, sick, and brainwashed. Who can't parrot the CDC's propaganda slogan "vaccines are safe and effective" and firmly believe every word they write, no matter how absurd? Another gem is "we believe in science" or "we follow the science" or "the science is settled" when that fraudulent "science" is created by corporations with an agenda to ultimately enslave us. Who will win this war? And are you one of the useful idiots who doesn't even know we are at war? I hope enough people will wake the F--- up that humanity wins this war. But right now we (humanity) are losing. The funny thing about a psychological war is that it can switch to winning simply by realizing we have a war and who our enemies are. Changing the awareness of 1 single person (waking them up) gets another person on the side of humanity. Unless a person wakes up, they are on the wrong side because they are just mindlessly reading the script of their enslavers. If you think I AM being political, that's completely wrong. There is virtually no difference anymore between the Right or Left (Democrats or Republicans). Even Trump's "Make America Great Again (MAGA)" movement went off the rails. I was on that train and anyone who realized we were at war in 2020 was with me. But don't bash yourself because I was just as fooled as everyone about Trump. Sure, he was lightyears better than the stupid idiot pretending to be POTUS (President of the US) now. But as smart people always know, actions speak louder than words and unless you are still suffering from Trump worship, you will see he is pushing the most evil thing probably ever created -- his pride and joy "Warp Speed" vaccines that are the final end game of this war to enslave us all. Nothing could be more evil than that. But like other Trump voters, I want to believe Trump is basically a good man and just doesn't know how duped he has become. Perhaps his vanity prevents him from seeing that he went off a cliff and probably millions of his supporters have jumped off with him by taking that poison "vaccine" which is a misnomer because it is actually gene therapy and indeed will alter your DNA as published by none other than Harvard University. Yes, we will win this war. We have to. WE MUST, because the consequences of losing are too great. And I will die trying rather than be enslaved. I think that must be everyone's attitude. "Live Free or Die" as we see is the state motto of New Hampshire since 1945. If you think my words will help convince some duped person to join the battle rather than puppet the slave master's slogans, please share it. Above all, realize there is no going back once a person gets this poison gene therapy falsely called a "vaccine." And did you know that the reason they even call it a vaccine is that it provides complete liability protection (at least in the USA)? Gene therapies wouldn't give that liability protection and they would be sued into dust -- their only just end. When this war is over, countless enemies and collaborators will face a new series of Nuremberg style trials. Executions galore. I won't do your own job by citing my sources for the above claims. Don't be so damn lazy and do your own research. In fact, you are unable to join this fight unless and until you actually wake up at least a little bit. Soon your research will lead you down a path of discovery that will blow your mind. To help your research, I will name a few of the researchers and content creators I think you will appreciate, in no particular order: There are so many more who use the above people as a reference and are good to watch their videos. While I reserve all copyrights for this post, feel free to quote all or part of it in any way you think may help us win this war. Contact me through MeWe (my new home after being thrown in jail for a month at a time from Facebook) where I AM most active. LET'S TURN THE TABLES ON THESE PSYCHOPATHS AND WIN THIS WAR Winston Churchill Quotesby admin - 2021-04-18 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Winston Churchill Jury Intimidation: I Did Not Want to Go Through Rioting, Destruction Again Says Chauvin Jurorby admin - 2021-04-27 ( education / civics / politics / legal ) [html version]
Nicholas Klein Quoteby admin - 2021-05-23 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- union leader Nicholas Klein. See wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Klein
Historic Court Case by Dr. Shiva to Fight Government, Twitter and Big Techby doug - 2021-05-24 ( education / civics / politics / legal ) [html version]Incredible Court Case by Dr. Shiva to fight Government, Twitter and Big Tech. The judge predicts this lawsuit will be taught in every future law class. Get caught up to date on this amazing victory for Americans and the Constitution. THE MEDIA REFUSES TO COVER THIS HISTORIC CASE -- YOU GOTTA WONDER WHY. Dr.SHIVA LIVE: The Lawsuit Against Government & Twitter That Big Media Will NEVER Cover. Support this historic lawsuit at: WinBackFreedom.Com See also: On YouTube Netanyahu Ousted After 12 Year Reign of Terrorby bill - 2021-06-06 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Only for the new boss to be same as the old boss. His replacement "supports illegal settlements." Still, this needs to be an international holiday! Read, listen or watch the rest here Good News Re Gov't Overreachby admin - 2021-06-13 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: thecivilrightslawyer.com Tom Mullen Quoteby admin - 2021-06-19 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Tom Mullen How to Contact Elected Officialsby bill - 2021-06-23 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Contact List For All U.S. State Legislators and Governors https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/ Contact List For U.S. Mayors https://www.usmayors.org/mayors/ Contact List For U.S. Sheriffs Joseph Goebbels Quoteby admin - 2021-06-24 ( culture / quotes / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]-- Joseph Goebbels I first noticed this coming from Bush-Cheney in 2000. Then, of course -- because no politician can let a good dirty trick go to waste -- Hillary Clinton and friends started using it (on steroids) in 2008 onward. Hitler Quoteby admin - 2021-06-25 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Adolf Hitler (no, we're not endorsing him or this idea) The Need for Evidence-based Public Health Emergency Responseby bill - 2021-06-28 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]What a concept! We never did get any sort open-to-the-public evidence proving the existence of the so-called covid-19. None that I saw, anyway
White House, CDC and W.H.O. are Hereby Bannedby bill - 2021-07-21 ( culture / humor / covid / politics ) [html version]In accordance with the White House's wishes, we are banning all misinformation from the worst offenders (the White House, CDC and WHO) from this website/platform. They have lost all credibility. I guess we should add justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&external-news-aggregators">Facebook, Twitter and Watch on YouTube to that list. Thank you for the suggestion, Joe. See also: reclaimthenet.org or lewrockwell.com Desantis Just Lost My 2024 Vote with Thisby bill - 2021-07-26 ( education / civics / politics / israel ) [html version][Updated: 2022-07-17 06:08:24]He stood as a beacon of courage against the covid lockdown scam, but this latest from him is disgusting. I know, I know, never expect a politician to have a spine, but this is downright un-American. You can't ban criticism of a foreign country. You can't ban criticism, period. Crap like this is why I cannot stand Israel, its supporters, or anyone who thinks they are above reproach simply by virtue of their demographic. Also, Israel as a country has no right to exist. They invaded Palestine in 1948, a legally recognized country, and have never stopped expanding their own territory ever since.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: DeSantis Uses Power of The State To Blacklist Ben And Jerry's For Not Loving Israel Enough Judge to J6 Political Prisoner Not Wearing Mask: When Did You Go to Medical School?by admin - 2021-08-04 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]
The Nuremberg Codeby bill - 2021-08-04 ( education / history / politics / legal ) [html version]Copied from https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/08/nullifying_nuremberg.html
A Letter to My Congressman Re H.R. 4980by bill - 2021-08-25 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]Dr. Green, H.R. 4980 is flat-out tyranny and MUST be defeated. It says...
You cannot ethically require vaccination against minimal-threat (to 99% of us) viruses such as covid. Remember your Hippocratic Oath. This "pandemic" b.s. (which is nothing more than bureaucrats drunk with power) has never been about public health, it's about fear-mongering and abuse of power. Thank you. William Casey Quoteby admin - 2021-09-09 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]We'll know our disinformation [campaign] is complete when everything the American public believe[s] is false."William Casey, CIA Director, 1981 Todd Wagner Quoteby admin - 2021-09-14 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Todd Wagner Minnesota Vikings fan still, Doug?by bill - 2021-09-21 ( culture / sports / politics ) [html version]I still watch international soccer, but have to turn it off when I see that no fans are allowed into the stands; or, worse, when they have fake crowd noise. That one kills me. So fake, both of which were worst in England. But I think that was only last year. All of the 'leisure' industries (sports, entertainment, travel) seem to be the worst enablers/enforcers of this worldwide farce. I guess it's because they're so completely at the mercy of various government regulations and hand-outs, so they have to play along? Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:23 AM Not a fan whatsoever of any sports team. It's been 18 months since I turned on the TV. Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 9:01 PM I'll watch out of curiosity. Super rich people don't mind playing God if they get the chance. After all, they have nothing more to aspire to. So if they can get some result they think it smart by stoking fires here and there, it's all justified in their warped thinking. Don't know if that's what some owner was doing, but they probably think they will be part of the elite who will run the world once the great reset comes into being. I Now Better Understand the Good Germanby bill - 2021-10-06 ( education / history / politics / wwii ) [html version]Good article.
Read, listen or watch the rest here: https://dennisprager.com/column/i-now-better-understand-the-good-german/ Poland Tells Eu to Get F***edby staff - 2021-11-28 ( education / civics / politics / europe ) [html version]You might appreciate this! Bruce Pardy Quoteby admin - 2021-12-08 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Bruce Pardy Read, listen or watch the rest here: rightsprobe.org/read/the-cold-war-continues-and-now-we-are-losing Authoritarian Politicians Over-stepping Their Bounds Must Be Stoppedby bill - 2021-12-08 ( life / health / covid / politics ) [html version]The headline says it all, but we need a quicker fix than to wait until the next election cycle to replace these bureaucrats and politicians, drunk with power, mandating this and that. The solution? As tempting as it may be, you cannot go around killing people, but you can kill their power. One state legislature, South Carolina, did try to limit its governor's power, but the governor, a Democrat, vetoed it. Shocker, I know. They had the right idea, but need to be more persistent and override such vetoes. California tried to remove its dictatorial governor, Gavin the Clueless, through the recall process, but the same apparatchiks who stole the 2020 presidential election took over and ensured ol' Gavin's victory, after which he predictably enacted even more draconian rules against this non-existent "pandemic". Leave a comment, below, if you have any better ideas. UPDATE: Here's one state, Wisconsin, whose legislature (through the courts) managed to rein in their out-of-control "health" department and governor. Mainstream news NBC spins it to make you think it's is a bad thing, but here is that article: nbcnews.com Marian Turski Quoteby admin - 2021-12-12 ( culture / quotes / politics / covid ) [html version]-- Marian Turski, Auschwitz survivor Read, listen or watch the rest here: austrians-beg-for-help-unvaccinated-to-face-1-year-in-prison-video/ There Has Never Been a Better Time to Question Authorityby bill - 2021-12-29 ( culture / people / politics / freedom ) [html version][Updated: 2021-12-29 04:27:37]Remember that old bumper sticker, "QUESTION AUTHORITY"? Well, there has NEVER been a better time than NOW for that frame of mind. These past two years it has been "AUTHORITIES" and "EXPERTS" versus FREEDOM OF CHOICE and COMMON SENSE. THE GROUP versus THE INDIVIDUAL. The 66.6% versus the 33.3%. Okay, that last one might be a bit of a stretch, but it does make me wonder if that is where the much-feared 666 comes from. Somebody into numerology two thousand years ago decided it was significant somehow? Who knows, but it is pretty much the split -- two-thirds against one-third -- between pro-covid-shot and anti-covid-shot. And, on this Christmas Day, it might be good to remember that Jesus was a rebel, going against the powers-that-be. We should all do the same. It's time. Fascism: a Bipartisan Afflictionby staff - 2022-01-19 ( education / civics / politics / fascism ) [html version]Read, listen or watch the rest here: Fascism: A Bipartisan Affliction, by Ron Paul If neoconservatives and progressives truly understood fascism, they would stop using the word as a smear term. That is because both groups, along with most political figures and commentators, embrace fascist ideas and policies. Why I Stand for Our National Anthemby staff - 2022-01-19 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Out of respect for those before us who fought for our country. Now for ... everyone who continues to fight for our country. Sadly, our fight is more important than ever... Stay strong and warrior on. Canadian Truckers Come Through for Usby don - 2022-02-09 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version][Updated: 2022-02-12 12:42:11]It's the college-educated who are most supportive of corporate/government totalitarianism, but it's the blue collar workers who are saving us from it. See https://twitter.com/i/status/1489675311042150403 UPDATE: I just donated to the Canadian Truckers. Did you know Ottawa Police are exempt from this vaccine mandate? See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbmdtcX5BR0 Here's the donation link: FreedomConvoy2022 Amnesty International Smears Peaceful Freedom Protesters as Violent Racistsby bill - 2022-02-19 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]How can a protest against unsafe medical treatments be equated to racism?
Cruz: Biden Limiting Scotus Pick to a Black Woman is Discriminating Based on Race'by bill - 2022-02-24 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Yep. Liberals just don't get it, can't see what should be obvious.
Tennessee Legislative Priorities for 2022by bill - 2022-02-25 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Take Action For Medical Freedom. These bills have been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Civil Justice Committee. Make your support known to members of these committees and ask them to vote YES on this bill. Canada-wide Walk-outby admin - 2022-02-25 ( education / civics / politics / tyranny ) [html version]
Canadians are known around the world to be among the most kind, the most peace-loving people anywhere. And so you know that when Canadians start rising up by the millions to oppose what their government is doing, something is horribly wrong. Tyranny is a Sign of Weaknessby admin - 2022-02-26 ( education / civics / politics / covid ) [html version]
Good point! See tyranny-is-a-sign-of-weakness-so-dont-underestimate-the-power-of-refusing-to-comply Dark Day for Canada: Mps Side with Trudeau, Vote in Favor of Police State...puppet Mastersby bill - 2022-02-26 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]What is it with the former British colonies turning Fascist? First Australia and New Zealand, and now Canada?
WEF's Young Global Leadersby doug - 2022-03-04 ( education / research / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]He names more than I ever heard before. Since Putin is one of them, it's interesting to see the war game the globalists are playing. Read, listen or watch the rest here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LcxpDhsaVZFO/ I think many are compiling a list so we can all shame them. I suppose you saw in Canada's parliament a question was asked about how many exist there, and they pretended not to understand... after saying it's a good question!! Useful Russia-ukraine Background Info (since 1990)by bill - 2022-03-04 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Read, listen or watch the rest here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If61baWF4GE&t=199s. The last five minutes is an ad for another streaming service called Nebula Thanks to From the Trenches World Report for the link. Biden Nominates Ketanji Jackson to Supreme Court, Keeps Vow to Base Choice on Race and Sexby bill - 2022-03-04 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]So, he admits to being racist and sexist, but his 2,345 actually verified voters will be too stupid to see that.
Putin Hopes to Expose Biden's Crime Wave in Ukraineby bill - 2022-03-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Let's hope!
Putin Orders Military to Destroy Bio-Labs in Ukraine as U.S.A. Scrubs Evidence of Their Existenceby admin - 2022-03-06 ( education / civics / politics / war ) [html version]
Read, listen or watch the rest here: Putin Orders Military to Destroy Bio-Labs in Ukraine as US Scrubs Evidence of Their Existence Has Biden Unknowingly Begun Wwiii in Financial Markets?by bill - 2022-03-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Everything Biden does is unknowingly.
'Beyond Humanity ... Damn Them': Russian Attack on Holocaust Memorial Slammedby bill - 2022-03-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]It wasn't hit. Every article I've read says missiles struck CLOSE TO or NEARBY. See Babi Yar Unscathed.
Russia Declares War on the Straussians...secret Historyby bill - 2022-03-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good article.
Biden Rejected by Saudis, Uae as He Tries to Replace Banned Russian Oilby bill - 2022-03-13 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Misleading headline. Being squeezed is not the same as being rejected.
Assad: What is this Democratic West in Which Hundreds of Millions of People Live but Which Has Only One Opinion?'by bill - 2022-03-25 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good point.
Grim Milestone: U.s. Coronavirus Deaths Pass One Million Mark - More Than 600,000 Deaths Under Bidenby bill - 2022-03-27 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Humans have been dying from coronaviruses for millennia.
Biden: Expect Real Food Shortages in Europe and the United Statesby bill - 2022-03-28 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Only a crappy "leader" would tell his people to "expect" bad things. A good leader would warn of impending problems while maintaining an encouraging tone, and come up with good real-world solutions.
Biden Braces America for the Great Reset: with Regard to Food Shortage Its Gonna Be Realby bill - 2022-03-28 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Only a crappy "leader" would tell his people to "expect" bad things. A good leader would warn of impending problems while maintaining an encouraging tone, and come up with good real-world solutions.
Eight in Ten Americans Worried Bidens Bumbling Will Lead to Nuclear Warby bill - 2022-03-31 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]I get so tired of the fear porn, don't you?
Deeply Compromised Biden is Driving the West Toward a Nuclear War with Russiaby bill - 2022-04-01 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]I get so tired of the fear porn, don't you?
Only 28% Say Biden Better for America Than Trumpby bill - 2022-04-11 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Where were these 28%, at a home for the mentally-disabled?
Actor Sean Penn's Charity Funded by Usaid, the Clintons, Rockefellers, Bill Gates and Jack Dorseyby bill - 2022-04-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Bill Gates needs to go back to whatever hell he slithered out of.
Biden Bypasses Congress, Issues New Gun Control Dictate with Complete Disregard for 2nd Amendmentby bill - 2022-04-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]And Congress just lets him?
Trump's Approval Ratings Remain High in Battleground States, Biden's Continue to Declineby bill - 2022-04-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]I get so tired of this Trump fanboy crap, don't you?
BBC Guide Tells Parents to Examine Their Biases If Their Toddler Only Has White Friendsby bill - 2022-04-16 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Of course, if they only have black or brown friends, that's fine.
80 Year Old Bernie Sanders Open to Running Again If Biden Doesn't Run in 2024by bill - 2022-04-24 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]All political and judicial positions need a mandatory retirement age of 75, if not younger.
Are Russian Oligarchs Being Assassinated?by bill - 2022-04-26 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]It' hard to feel sorry for oligarchs.
Biden Accepts Invitation to Visit Israel in Coming Monthsby bill - 2022-04-28 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]I won't be surprised if the Deep State takes him out and blames it on Muslim terrorists.
Nearly One-third of Le Pen Backers Say French Presidential Election is Riggedby bill - 2022-04-29 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Another rigged election, I'm sure.
Fertilizer Giant Cf Industries Begs Biden to Allow Shipments for Spring Planting, to Prevent Food Shortagesby bill - 2022-04-30 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Biden Regime Announces Creation of Disinformation Governance Board Under the Authority of Homeland Security with a Lunatic in Chargeby bill - 2022-05-01 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]... because only THEY can be allowed to spew disinformation.
Stephen Lendman Quoteby admin - 2022-05-01 ( culture / quotes / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]-- Stephen Lendman Biden's Disinformation Chief: There are Many Non-binary People Who Give Birth'by bill - 2022-05-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]There are many WOMEN of various sexual PREFERENCE who give birth, sure.
Biden Claims Oil Production at Historic Levels Even as Output Plungesby bill - 2022-05-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Historically low, yes.
Biden Official Puts Positive Spin on Food Shortages: Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste'by bill - 2022-05-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Orwellian Fellows: Hitler, Stalin, Putin and Bidenby bill - 2022-05-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Hitler arguably DID have Jewish blood on his mother's side.
Trump Would Beat Biden by Double Digits If Election Were Held Todayby bill - 2022-05-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]He beat him by double digits in 2020, but look where that got him.
Biden's Climate Czar Declares War on Kitchen Appliancesby bill - 2022-05-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Yes, God forbid we have the ability to cook our own meals and not depend on government-provided MREs.
Dark Origins of Biden's New Ministry of Truthby bill - 2022-05-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Biden REALLY wishes people would stop reading and quoting Orwell's 1984).
Biden Announces Food Shortages Then Makes It Happenby bill - 2022-05-09 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Yep.
Bidenomics: Gas Prices Reach Another All-time High as Congress Votes to Send $40 Billion to Ukraine and Baby Formula Shortage Worsensby bill - 2022-05-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Koch Network Cheers Biden's Extending Work Permits for Illegal Aliens as 12M Americans are Joblessby bill - 2022-05-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]The Biden regime WANTS Americans jobless and dependent upon the gov't, and they want illegals for their cheap labor.
Washington Post Op-ed: Change Racist Name of George Washington Universityby bill - 2022-05-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]By that logic, they need to change the name of the city and their own paper.
Biden Spox Karine Jean-pierre Laughs When Asked Who is Running Point on Baby Formula Shortageby bill - 2022-05-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Biden Randomly Starts Screaming About Food Shortages... Currently Happening Under His Administration, Rips into MAGA Crowdby bill - 2022-05-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Biden's Economy is a Colossal Failure When Compared to Donald Trump'sby bill - 2022-05-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Compared to almost ANY president.
Psaki Grilled on Baby Formula Shortage as Biden Regime Prioritizes Illegal Aliens Over Americansby bill - 2022-05-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Biden Regime Knew of Baby Formula Shortage in February, Failed to Prevent Itby bill - 2022-05-16 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
All of a Sudden It's on the Front Page of Every Newspaper...Dummy Biden Finally Addresses Baby Formula Shortageby bill - 2022-05-16 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Gas Prices Hit 4th Straight All-Time Record High on Friday...As Biden Cancels Oil-Gas Leases in Gulf of Mexico and Alaskaby bill - 2022-05-17 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]His puppeteers must be squealing with delight at the destruction wrought by this idiot president.
Biden Loses Cool While Recalling Food Shortages Under Donald Trumpby bill - 2022-05-17 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Biden's America: Mother Charged with Manslaughter After She Steals Baby Items and Her Baby and Boyfriend are Killed During Pursuitby bill - 2022-05-18 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Partisan overreach. You can't blame Biden (as destructive as he is) for this couple's crimes.
Buttigieg Says Biden Regime Working to End Baby Formula Shortageby bill - 2022-05-19 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Intentional, manufactured shortage.
Bernie Refuses to Rule Out 2024 Presidential Bid After Blasting Pro-Life Dems, Manchin, Sinemaby bill - 2022-05-19 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]So he can lose yet again? He's too old, anyway.
Californians Fleeing to Portugalby doug - 2022-05-20 ( education / news / travel / politics ) [html version]I guess they didn't do their research because Portugal is just as bad as other locations in Europe with medical fascism, etc. Maybe that's what they seek. So then good riddance! Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 8:43 AM Escape "Trumpian politics"? I suppose they're liberals ruining another place as those from SF ruined Sacto On Wednesday, May 18, 2022, 08:16:45 AM Locals don't like it Biden Faces Criticism for Visiting Buffalo Having Skipped Visit to Waukeshaby bill - 2022-05-20 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Corrupt politicians only visit false-flag sites.
Elon Musk Slams Dummy Biden: the Real President is Whoever Controls the Teleprompterby bill - 2022-05-20 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Yes!
Biden Appointee Calls Washington, D.c. Ancestral Homelands for Two Tribesby bill - 2022-05-22 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]They can have it!
Biden's America: Mother Caught Hoarding Baby Formula to Feed Her Infantsby bill - 2022-05-23 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Hoarding or stocking up? If you're a human, it's called hoarding; for companies it's called planning ahead.
It's Time to Walk Away from a Hopelessly Corrupt Federal Government that Facilitates Biden's Destruction of Americaby bill - 2022-05-24 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Don't walk away. It's our country. Send THEM packing!
Australia Votes for Leftism; Center-right Party Loses Control After 9 Years in Powerby bill - 2022-05-25 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Whoever was in power the past 2.5 years NEEDED to go.
Backlash Prompts State Farm to Stop Donating Trans Books for 5-year-oldsby bill - 2022-05-27 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Ya think? Their community outreach (or whatever) person needs to be fired.
News from Australiaby staff - 2022-05-30 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]In case you're interested... Right Now -- Playwright & Historian Michael Gray Griffith Tells Us About His Freedom Fighting Tour Brazilian President Bolsonaro: I Hope Biden Will Keep the Agreements I Signed with Trumpby bill - 2022-05-31 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]You seriously expect him to keep any promise, let alone his predecessor's?
We Need Your Guidance...Biden Praises Authoritarian New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardernby bill - 2022-06-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Of course he does.
Tucker Carlson Warns Disarming You is the Point of Biden Gun Control Pushby bill - 2022-06-06 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Duh.
Biden's Cdc: Put the Masks Back on for Monkeypoxby bill - 2022-06-10 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Even Fauci admits masks don't block viruses.
Biden Trips While Boarding Air Force Oneby bill - 2022-06-11 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]TGP is juvenile sometimes with their headlines.
Biden Threatens to Uphold Abortion with Executive Orders If Roe V. Wade is Overturnedby bill - 2022-06-13 ( education / news / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2023-02-19 21:29:20]He can try, but Supreme Court rulings and Congressional acts supersede Presidential memos.
Read, listen or watch the rest here UPDATE: See also: how-to-effectively-resist-tyranny-without-direct-confrontation-threats-or-danger/ Another British Mercenary was Killed While Fighting with Kiev Forcesby bill - 2022-06-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Are we supposed to feel sorry for mercenaries now?
MAJORITY of AMERICANS BELIEVE Biden Regime is INTENTIONALLY LETTING GAS PRICES SKYROCKETby bill - 2022-06-16 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]He practically said as much, himself.
Alarm Over Poll that Reveals Large Numbers of Canadians Believe in Conspiracy Theoriesby bill - 2022-06-18 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]As Dobie Pokorny says, if you're not a conspiracy theorist these days, you're just not paying attention.
Biden Refers to L-g-b-t-q-l Community in Yet Another Verbal Gaffeby bill - 2022-06-19 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]In his defense, nobody can keep up with that ever-expanding acronym.
Biden Says He is Unpopular Because Americans are Mentally Unwellby bill - 2022-06-20 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]The old I know you are, but what am I? angle, eh?
People Who Still Support Biden Be Likeby doug - 2022-06-24 ( culture / humor / politics ) [html version]Funny! What We DON'T Want You To Know! - News Update on behalf of JP Sears Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 6:27 AM Let's just blame Russia. In this segment of Lies You Can Trust, we take a break from committee coverage of the insurrection that "never happened" to bring to you the inside scoop of recently released network news show ratings. Who has the most views CNN, Fox News or yours truly? Remember, numbers are #facts. Grab some propaganda popcorn and watch it here. For my next video I confront a loyal Uncle Joe supporter to discuss gas prices, food shortages, and inflation -- all the while a big, black goat gets a bit overly friendly. Don't worry, no animals were harmed while making this video. (Though if it were, we would just blame Russia.) Enjoy People Who Still Support Biden here! If you love the red-white-and-blue as much as I do, check out our Independence Day Collection mech. Grab it by tomorrow (6/23), so you can spread the free-thinking vibes this July 4th! Remember, we are home of the free because of the BRAVE! Together we are TEAM FREEDOM! JP PS) Avoid looking like a communist sympathizer, and make sure to place an order by tomorrow (6/23) to get your freedom merch in time for the 4th! Shop here. Awaken with JP PO BOX 92135 6104 Old Fredericksburg Rd, Austin, TX, United States, 78709 BBC Staff Told There are More Than 150 Genders and Urged to Develop Trans Brand'by bill - 2022-06-29 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]BBC leaders are clearly morons.
Infertility: a Diabolical Agendaby staff - 2022-07-03 ( culture / movies-tv-video / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]Every pharma product is suspect, I think. I heard the tetanus shot has something inside to sterilize people. A neighbor claims it happened to her. Unless humanity stops them I think they will achieve their goal. A film by award-winning filmmaker Andy Wakefield, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children's Health Defense. Watch the chilling tale of African women whose fertility was tragically stripped away through an experimental tetanus vaccination program. Are women everywhere next? NEW DOCUMENTARY INFERTILITY: A DIABOLICAL AGENDA "When they're through with Africa, they're coming for you." -- DR. STEPHEN KARANJA Biden Claims Americans Must Pay More at the Pump Until Russian War Endsby bill - 2022-07-04 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Bush falsely linked 9/11 to the Iraq war, now Biden is falsely linking the Ukraine war and U.S. fuel prices.
Biden Job Approval Hits New Lowby bill - 2022-07-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]A more honest poll would show 10% approval, at best. And now, there's this: 90% say country on wrong track.
Biden's Massive Failures Would Not Have Occurred Under Trump Presidencyby bill - 2022-07-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]...which is why the election was thrown in Biden's favor.
Be Sociable, Not Socialistby bill - 2022-07-09 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good idea.
Surprise Articleby doug - 2022-07-16 ( education / news / politics / wwiii ) [html version][Updated: 2023-05-24 15:25:11]I ran across this article from 2021 which quoted me. Look near the end. " da Rocha, a subscriber, wrote to me the other day, saying, quite rightly that, 'This is a war on humanity. It is not a war between countries. It's a war to enslave humanity and there are almost countless attacks of all types – psychological, pharmaceutical, food, air, water, and often there are pawns who really do shoot people, i.e. Antifa or Black Lives Matter's useful idiots. Read, listen or watch the rest here: aspergers-alumni-association-what-if-cancel-culture-fascists-have-a-clinical-condition Tucker Carlson Confirmed as Victim of NSA Spyingby staff - 2022-07-24 ( education / news / politics / communism ) [html version]I wrote my senator and asked them to start a public investigation. You all should assume your emails are being recorded and saved. I must point out that, though their methods are fascist, technically, they are Marxist. That's why they hate the middle class, a.k.a. the bourgeoisie. The response to covid specifically targeted small business. But wage earners are called the "petty bourgeoisie," so they hate us, too. "In Marxist philosophy, the bourgeoisie is the social class that came to own the means of production during modern industrialization and whose societal concerns are the value of property and the preservation of capital to ensure the perpetuation of their economic supremacy in society." Democrats operate like the Communist party of the USSR. Party is everything, issues are not to be discussed, only: are you Blue or Red? Of course, when Big Tech colludes with Big Gov't, that is the very definition of fascism. So it's more like Chinese communism than Soviet. To understand why Democrats such as Biden, Obama and Pelosi hate you, you must understand Marx. If Democrats Aren't Racist and Marxistby staff - 2022-08-21 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2022-08-28 20:37:58]Here's what I sent Dinesh D'souza in hopes the ideas might propagate without my having to join social media. I told him he could borrow/steal it, and that I only had a 2-year degree in the 1970s when college education was a real thing. "If Democrats aren't racist, then why are they calling people who aren't racist, racists? (Psychology 101) On the Abuse of Powerby bill - 2022-08-24 ( education / civics / politics / power ) [html version][Updated: 2023-01-19 23:16:18]These past few years have made it clear it's the haves against the have-nots; the governments/corporations/groups against the individuals; the controllers versus the controlled. Here's a great article on the subject: The Authorities are our Enemies A list of relevant articles: Very Good Conversation with Harvey Schby doug - 2022-09-13 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Worth watching for world politics. Starts about the 10 minute mark. https://www.bitchute.com/video/mrGMGq619Jq9/ Very Good Conversation with Harley Schlangerby doug - 2022-09-13 ( education / civics / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]Worth watching for world politics. Starts about the 10-minute mark. "Harley Schlanger rejoins the program to explain the organized targeting, censoring and eliminating of journalists and politicians who dare to think differently." Biden Pardoning All Prior Federal Offenses of Simple Marijuana Possessionby bill - 2022-10-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Probably to benefit his son Hunter, but still a good idea "(FOX NEWS) President Biden will pardon all prior federal offenses of simple marijuana possession, the White House said Thursday. The move applies to those convicted of simple possession of marijuana, including those in the..." Community Organizerby don - 2022-10-18 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Since many believe Obama is running the Marxist Biden administration We might want to look at a history of comnunist organizing, euphemistically called a community organizing https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/philadelphia-communists-1936-1956/section/c5cbd6e3-ed24-4bcb-97b0-da424fc58416 */the communist as organizer/* In the period between the Great Crash and the McCarthy era the CPUSA was the most effective organizing agency within the American experience.=1 In this most politically stable of societies, radicals have usually battered their heads against the stone wall of affluence, rising expectations, and Democratic Party loyalty. Within the narrow space of agitation allowed by the political order, Communist Party activists built a small but influential organization devoted to organizing constituencies for social change. According to even the most unsympathetic accounts, Communist activists played important roles in organizing the unemployed, evicted tenants, minorities, and workers in a wide variety of fields. They were central in the emergence of the CIO and thus in the organizing of workers in heavy industry and mass production; they spearheaded the defense of the right of black people to equality before the law and social and economic opportunity; and they participated in virtually all of the nationalefforts to establish humane social services and eliminate hunger, disease, and neglect from our communities.=2 Many analysts question the motives of Communist Party activists, and there certainly is controversy about the extent of their organizing successes. Nevertheless, Communist organizing merits serious and objective consideration. For a period of approximately thirty years, Communist Party activists and organizers sought out constituents in the mines, plants, and neighborhoods of the United States. Other left-wing groups, such as the Socialist Party, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party, and A. J. Muste's Workers Party, also deserve study, but the CPUSA offers students the best opportunity to examine the dynamics of organizing sponsored and directed by a radical political group.=3 The organizers under consideration came to political maturity during the 1930s, mostly in an era associated with the Popular Front, and remained within the Party until at least the mid-Fifties. Indeed, many remained active organizers and participants after leaving the organizational framework of the Communist Party. In the thirties and forties, they modified their Bolshevik rhetoric and participated in antifascist alliances, worked for modest short-term successes within the fledgling CIO, and provided support and manpower for a diverse group of radical and progressive political movements and leaders, including Democrats, Farmer-Laborites, the American Labor Party in New York, and Communist Party councilmen in New York City, all under an essentially New Deal banner.=4 Organizers operating in the greater Philadelphia district had important trade-union successes and played a key role in organizing unemployed councils, electoral efforts, tenant rights, and peace, professional lobbying, civil liberties, ethnically based, and neighborhood groups. For a period of approximately ten years, from 1936 to perhaps 1947, the Communist Party of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, District Three, played an important if modest role in the political life of the area, generating ideas, programs, and visions that later became the commonplaces of social policy. The Party offered its membership several roles. One could remain at the rank-and-file level, become a cadre, or rise to functionary. One could engage in mass work within one of the Party fronts or a non-Party organization (e.g., the YMCA) or one could become a "colonizer," engaging in industrial organizing at the beck and call of the Party. In addition, one could work within the professional section, providing the Party with such services as legal counsel.=5 */rank and file/* At the lowest level of Party membership were the rank and file, the proverbial "Jimmy Higginses" who worked within Party clubs and branches, paid their dues, went to a variety of meetings, and joined the mass organizations and fronts, often focusing on a specific issue like Spain, civil rights, or Scottsboro. Such rank-and-filers were at the heart of everyday activities and what Gornick calls "grinding ordinariness."=6 There was an extraordinary turnover among such members, who often became weary of meetings,/Daily Worker/solicitations, and office chores. Many rank-and-filers began their activism while in college or sometimes high school. The Philadelphia high school movement was quite sizable, including ASU and YCL chapters in at least eight schools. High school activists ranged throughout the city, meeting radical peers, socializing, and developing their own circle of comrades. For those who entered college either already active or about to be radicalized, there was an almost dizzying flow of activities, including demonstrations, marches, sit-downs, leaflettings, fundraisers, dances, parties, socials, lectures, speeches—and meetings. Always, there were meetings, one for every night of the week, often more.=7 Enthusiastic, recently converted Communists, like their spiritual children in the 1960s, had unbounded energy for political work. Most speak of being aroused and inspired by their sense of the significance of their efforts, the quality of their comrades, and the grandeur and power of their movement. Abe Shapiro recalls being engrossed at one time in the following activities: formal YCL meetings, ASU leadership, a universityantiwar council (of which he was director), Spanish civil war relief efforts, a variety of antifascist activities, a student-run bookstore cooperative, and support work for assorted civil liberties and civil rights causes. Some activists found schoolwork boring under the circumstances and devoted all of their time to politics. A few became "colonizers." In most cases, however, Communist students completed their degree work, and if they dropped out of school, it was often for financial reasons. For most, the excitement of campus politics held their attention and their interest. Some found Party youth work a path toward leadership, becoming citywide or national ASU or YCL leaders. Others on leaving campus became YCL branch or section organizers in different parts of the district. Many who did not attend college did neighborhood work with the YCL, often focusing their mass organizational efforts through the American League for Peace and Democracy. To many youthful rank-and-filers, "the YCL became . . . Marxist-Leninist theory all mixed up with baseball, screwing, dancing, selling the/Daily Worker/, bullsh-tting, and living the American-Jewish street life."=8 Certainly the first flush of radicalism, the emotional high of purposeful activity, the sense of accomplishment and of sacrifice for the good of humanity, the work with fine and noble comrades, the love affairs with those sharing a common vision, the expectation that the future was indeed theirs, created a honeymoon effect for most young Communists. For some, the fad of radicalism passed upon graduation or thereabouts. Others simply maintained a regular but distant "fellow-traveling" role as they entered the work world. And many were disillusioned by the Party's dogmatism or the great purge trials, the attacks on Trotsky, or the Non-Aggression Pact of 1939. Others, including those interviewed, remained in the Party. The shortest stay was six years, and most remained loyal for twenty years or more. For all of those who stayed, the Party and its small subculture became their lives. Those working at the branch, club, and section levels were rarely on the Party payroll and had to find work to supportthemselves. For single people problems were few and life could be lived at a double-time pace, working hard all day and then organizing and holding meetings every night. Some young Communists drifted for a time after school, doing Party work but not settling into anything. Ben Green lived in Strawberry Mansion, a lower-middle- and working-class Jewish neighborhood filled with Party people at the time. He did some work with the American League Against War and Fascism, spoke on street corners occasionally, went to three to four meetings a week, and helped to start a union local of public employees at his Works Progress Administration (WPA) office. He remembers that the Party "made it a big thing" when he shifted from the YCL to adult membership, but he was still looking at his future with uncertainty. Upon completing high school, George Paine felt that "sports were gone" from his life except for an occasional neighborhood basketball game. He kept in touch but saw less of old non-Party buddies and did standard political work, "hustling the paper," going to meetings, demonstrating. Finally he decided to go to college, suspending but not ending his Party ties. One rank-and-filer was a skilled craftsman, "glad of the class I was born into." He belonged to a conservative craft union and limited his political work to mass work at the local YMCA. He never really got involved with a club or branch group but paid his dues, subscribed to the paper, and worked with comrades to move the "Y" in a more "progressive" direction. He was quite open about his views, which would eventually get him into trouble at his job: "I felt that since to me everything was so clear, they'd hug me." Tim Palen, a farmer and skilled craftsman who lived in a rural suburb of Philadelphia, worked with the Farmers Union. A Party rank-and-filer, he helped farmers get low-interest loans through the union and sympathetic banks. Palen never involved himself with Party affairs in the city, and the highest office he held was dues secretary of his section. Since the Communist Party did not formally label members according to their rank, it is not always clear who was a rank-and-filer and who was considered cadre. One former district leader defines cadres as the people in training for leadership, like officers in an army. The rank and file are, therefore, foot soldiers, less involved and more a part of their own neighborhood or plant, more likely to hold conventional jobs, and more subject to pressures from neighbors, family, and changing circumstances. Annie Kriegel, who analyzes the French Communist Party as a set of concentric circles, places fellow travelers who vote for the Party and read the Sunday Party press on the "outer circle" and "ordinary party members" in the "first circle."=9 Many observers describe such rank-and-filers as less "Bolshevik"—that is, more likely to break Party discipline in everyday activity and closer to the behavior and sensibilities of their non-Party peers. Harvey Klehr puts it, "Many party members received no training of any kind, attendance at party meetings was often spotty, and members frequently ignored or failed to carry out assigned tasks."=10 Almond presents esoteric and exoteric models to distinguish rank-and-filer from cadre, suggesting that the Party daily press directed itself to the relatively idealistic and naive external members, while the Comintern, Cominform, and internal Party journals spoke to insiders and sophisticated activists.=11 */cadre/* The cadre has a "personal commitment." He or she is a "true Bolshevik," internally Communized, with an almost priestly function and sense of specialness. The cadre is a "professional revolutionary" along Leninist lines.=12 Philip Selznick adds that cadres are "deployable personnel," available to the Party at all times.=13 Some observers use "cadre" interchangeably with "functionary," while others distinguish them. I interpret "functionary" as a more administrative and executive role, usually carrying more authority and generally associated with top district and national leadership.=14 Cadres were field workers, organizers, sometimes on the payroll but often holding a non-Party job. Some more mobile cadres lefttheir own neighborhoods, but most worked at least within their home districts. (Functionaries, on the other hand, could be homegrown and district-bound or at the service of the national, even international, office.) Many studies exaggerate the distinction between inner core and outer rings because of their dependence on the abstractions of Party tracts. Almond, for example, claims that the "true Communist" was beyond any commitment to the Popular Front since he was presumably fully Bolshevized and aware of the duplicity and tactical nature of moderated rhetoric. Perhaps this is true of the national leadership, who had associations with Moscow, training at the Lenin School, and Comintern experience. At the district level, however, the patterns are not as clear and seem to be more sensitive to generational, class, and ethnic variables.=15 Among informants, the word "cadre" connoted "hard-working," "brave," "dogged," and "honorable"—someone who followed a Leninist model of behavior; "functionary," on the other hand, was often used negatively to imply that someone was "bureaucratic," "aloof," "abstract," and "remote from struggle"—in brief, the Stalinist/apparatchik/. Neither necessarily belonged to an inner core. Fred Garst tells of the "process of indoctrination" he underwent as he entered into Party life, beginning with "the regularity of systematic participation"—dues, meetings, selling Party literature. He says that the number of meetings began slowly to escalate to three, sometimes five a week: section and subsection meetings, executive meetings, front meetings. Next, Garst was asked to lead a discussion, then to take responsibility for organizing the distribution of literature. He started taking classes at a local Workers School in Marxist theory and labor history. His commitment grew, his experience deepened, and he soon became a section leader. Some Philadelphia Communists moved from rank-and-file to cadre roles during important political campaigns like theProgressive Party efforts of 1947–1948. One woman had been serving in a minor capacity—"not anything earth-shattering"—but was swept up by what Wallace referred to as "Gideon's Army." She became a full-time Progressive Party organizer at a district level, her "first real organizing"; from that point on, she was fully involved in Party work at a variety of levels. Some cadres emphasized front and mass work, serving as leaders of IWO ethnic groups, youth groups, and defense groups. Such cadres were particularly likely to operate clandestinely, although many communicated their affilitation all but formally to constituents. Cadres can be distinguished by their level of operation (club, branch, section, or district), by their funding (on the payroll or holding a regular job), by their relative mobility and willingness to do political work outside their own milieu, and, finally, by the type of organizing they did (mass or front work, electoral party work, industrial organizing). The most prestigious cadres were those who did full-time industrial organizing at the will of the Party leadership. Such organizers, whether of working-class origins or not and whether indigenous or colonizers, were the heart of Party operations, seeking to develop a proletarian constituency and a trade-union base. /ny tisa/ ny Tisa's history shows what an experienced organizer could accomplish. Tisa, a second-generation son of illiterate, working-class peasants, went to work at the Campbell's Soup plant in his own South Camden "Little Italy" after completing high school in the early 1930s. While working summers at the plant, he had been stimulated by street-corner radical speakers and had joined the Socialist Party, which had a presence at Campbell's Soup. The Socialists sent him to Brookwood Labor College, where he met young Communists who impressed him with their earnestness and apparent lack of factionalism, a problem he encountered among the Socialists. He returned to help organize the plant, starting with a small group of about a half-dozen Italian workers, none of themCommunists, whom he molded through a discussion group. His group received a federal charter from the American Federation of Labor and began to develop an underground, dues-paying membership. Tisa tells of frustrating experiences within the conservative AFL. At the 1939 convention in Tampa, for example, he found himself accidently strolling into a local walk-out of Del Monte workers, just as the police were arresting the leader. He spoke to thery workers and was himself threatened with arrest. The workers exclaimed, "You got Bo [the arrested leader] but you're not gonna get him," and made a ring to escort Tisa to a streetcar. That evening, at his suggestion, there was a union meeting, packed and excited. When Tisa tried to speak about this remarkable experience at the AFL convention, he was refused the floor. Finally he simply took over the podium and microphone. Later that day, he met with other militants, including Communists, to organize the ClO-affiliated Food, Tobacco and Agricultural Workers Union. He took a detour, however, as events in Spain captured his energies and idealism. Tisa served two years in Spain with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, gaining "a sense of internationalism that never escapes you." On his return, he immediately set out to organize Campbell's Soup. At the time Tisa began to organize it, Campbell's Soup employed about 5,500 full-time workers, with another 5,000 part-timers who came in during the heavy season. At least half the workers were of Italian descent; there were few blacks until the late 1940s. About half the work force was female. There was a sexual division of labor based on physical strength. Tisa's organizing group consisted of eleven or twelve key workers, all leftists, mostly Italian. None were "colonizers." All were indigenous workers who, under Tisa's leadership, planned the unionization of Campbell's. Tisa recalls that the group would often go crabbing and then return to his home to eat, drink, and talk strategy. Tisa was the only member of the group on the national union's payroll; he made a bare ten or fifteen dollars a week. The organizers distributed themselves through the plant, reaching out to obvious sympathizers and picking up useful information that they would relay to Tisa, who could not enter the plant. He would take names and visit workers in their homes, signing them up so that the union could hold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election. He would also cull information about working conditions from his organizers and publish it in a union bulletin that they distributed clandestinely, each carrying five to ten copies. As their numbers increased, they became bolder and distributed the much discussed bulletin openly. Campbell's Soup had Tisa arrested once, but when he was released, many workers came to greet him. He assured them that the law permitted them to organize a union. The company tried many tactics to block his efforts: they started a company union; they charged that he was a "Red" and had raped nuns and killed priests in Spain. But Tisa lived in an Italian neighborhood among plant workers and had a mother who had worked in the plant for many years (cheering his speeches, often at the wrong times, he wryly and lovingly notes); he could not be red-baited easily. He was an open Communist; his neighbors would say, "ny's a Communist, but he's all right." Despite the real barrier of the workers'traditional Catholicism, he produced traditional trade-union benefits for members and was popular enough locally, a neighbor, to remain in leadership until the CIO purges of the late forties and early fifties finally forced him out. Tisa's experience highlights the importance of developing indigenous personnel in organizing activity. His efforts were certainly bolstered by support from the national union, by Communist Party training and aid, and by the relative benevolence of the federal government as expressed through the new NLRB. Yet the presence of local activists, something the Communist Party sought but did not often achieve, invariably made the task of organizing a plant or neighborhood that much easier. Other organizers performed similar roles without formally entering the Party, preferring to remain independent although generally taking positions consistent with Party policy. /jack ryan/ Jack Ryan's old man was "a union man," later a foreman, a local Democratic politician, and a bootlegger. As a teen-ager, and a high school drop-out, Ryan ran poker and crap games in the neighborhood with a group of friends, some of whom wound up in prison. He worked sporadically as a roofer, during which time he was influenced by a socialist "who couldn't read or write until he was twenty-three." His father finally got him a job at a local plant, where he worked as a crane operator in the early Depression years until he was laid off in 1931. Over the next two years, he tried a small store and "managed to hang on," selling water ice and running crap games. In 1933 he went back to the plant just at the point when the local union was being formed. Ryan recalls that he was "sworn in in an elevator with the lights out in between the floors." Despite his emerging radical politics, Ryan remained on the margins at first. "I deliberately didn't get active," he says, indicating that life seemed too unpredictable to take chances. In fact, he entered into a real-estate business on the side, and it eventually provided him with the cushion that allowed him to become more active within the plant. Initially he ran for the general committee, backed by the other crane operators because of his successful grievance work. Still cautious ("I kept my mouth shut," he notes), Ryan went along with the conservative local leadership while maintaining contact with the plant militants, several of whom were old Wobblies suspicious of any Communist Party leadership. Ryan worked primarily through his own crane operators' network within the plant. He played the trade-offs in union posts among the plant's crafts to become local president, an unpaid post, and finally business representative, the only salaried position within the local. Ryanremained close to the Party but never joined. "I was more radical than they were," he brags. He criticizes their twists and turns and suggests that "in the end you can't trust any of them" because of "the goddamn line." He adds that the/Daily Worker/was "written for a bunch of morons." On the other hand, Ryan admits that Party union members were often competent and successful organizers and that he agreed with most of their Popular Front stances, particularly their antifascism. On the Soviets, he says that he did not spend too much time thinking about them, but adds, "I don't blame them for having a treaty with the Germans." Ryan is clearly concerned with the practical issues of trade unionism. In describing one of his national officers, he exclaims, "A dedicated Communist but a helluva guy." He praises L. Lewis's efforts at industrial unionization: "him and the Commies put together the CIO; they were the smartest crowd." So Jack Ryan worked with but kept some distance from "the Commies": "they were a little bit nutty." His union was one of those expelled from the CIO in the late forties, and he remains bitter about the Party's role in the union's decline. He remained active, holding union office on and off until his retirement. Ryan proudly concludes that he was placed on Social Security while on strike for the last time in the early seventies. ny Tisa and Jack Ryan were working-class organizers, with roots in their ethnic communities, able to establish a rapport with their peers and, at the same time, develop more sophisticated skills within a broader and more ideological movement in or around the Communist Party. Their failures were mostly exogenous, the results of Taft-Hartley oaths, CIO purges, and McCarthyism in general. Others operated in less favorable terrain, without the decided advantages of an indigenous, working-class background. The most characteristic Party labor organizer was a young, educated, second-generation Jewish-American sent to "dig roots into the working-class." The efforts of such organizers were prodigious; their accomplishments, however, were more problematic. /al schwartz/ Al Schwartz's father was a 1905er, a Party organizer in the garment industry who had to open a small shop after he was blacklisted. Al, a classic "red-diaper baby," went through all of the Party developmental steps, from Young Pioneers through YCL to full Party involvement. Most of all he wanted to be a radical journalist. For a few years he was able to work on the Pennsylvania supplement to the/Worker/, but when it folded, his journalism career seemed over. Over the next half-dozen years, Schwartz, now in his late twenties, went into the shops as a "colonizer." He remembers the sense of adventure and mission he felt working at a few of the larger heavy industrial plants in the area. Yet he also speaks of his sense of loss and defeat in having to aban hopes of writing. Schwartz's response to colonizing was painfully ambivalent: a college graduate and a Jew, born and bred within the Yiddish-Left subculture, he both relished the contact with blue-collar workers and remained distant from them. They were not like him, he stresses; they were mired in back-breaking labor, poor educations, and plebian forms of leisure. For a time he enjoyed the camaraderie of the local taverns, but ultimately he was an outsider, a Jewish family man and a struggling intellectual. Schwartz most fondly recalls the hardness and fitness of his body, the feeling that he was young and strong and physically a worker. But the successes were few, and later the McCarthy period made such Party efforts even more marginal. Schwartz found himself a family man in his mid-thirties without a career or a profession; frustrated and drifting out of Party life without drama or flourish, he moved to reorganize his life. His political values held, but his colonizing days were over. /sol davis/ Sol Davis grew up in a poor, working-class, immigrant household. He was a bright young boy, and like many other upwardly aspiring Jewish males, he flourished at the elite Central High School andbegan moving toward a professional career. At this point, in the early years of the Depression, he was swept off his feet, as he puts it, by the Communist Party. After completing his schooling, he worked lackadaisically at his profession while seeking an opportunity to go into the shops as a Communist Party organizer; he was "determined to be shop worker." His first attempts allowed him to learn something about machinery, although in each instance he was fired for his inexperience and incompetence. Finally he caught on. "I was in my element," he asserts, describing the war years in heavy industry. For Davis, the good organizer had to have a commitment to "the principles of Communism," "a talent for leadership," and a willingness to listen. A confident speaker, whose words are clipped and terse, he worked twenty-nine years in the shops, twenty-six of them at one plant. Located within the city, the plant was staffed mostly by Catholic workers (Polish or Irish), initially few blacks, and even fewer Jews. Davis's recollections are filled with bitter refrains about red-baiting and "turn-coat ex-CPers," sell-outs and "social democrats." He is proud of his successes, which include chairing the grievance committee and serving as shop steward during most of his union years. Davis presents his life as devoted to organizing in the shops; he never got involved in his neighborhood and tended to leave Party electoral work to others. A hard-line orthodox Communist still, Davis argues that those who abandoned the Party were "petty-bourgeois with petty-bourgeois ideas," whereas he "was nursed out of the trade-union movement." In the fifties, he admits, "life became unpleasant," both in his largely Jewish lower-middle-class neighborhood and in the shop, where "a certain resistance developed to my activity" among people he calls anti-Communist socialists. Davis believes that most American workers have been bought off in "discrete and discernible fashion" by imperialist profits, manipulated by the mass media, and blinded by nationalism, religion, and racism. After spending almost thirty years in theindustrial heartland, Davis remains "dedicated to an idea," an "unquestioned belief" in communism. Yet when asked about his ability to convert workers to class consciousness, a saddened Sol Davis replies, "Never—the shop was a desert for me." He did not convert a single worker and was "in that respect an utter failure." The shops, to the stoical Davis, were "a cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland despite having made so many friends." Sol Davis has kept the faith since he was "baptized" in the movement; his singular lack of organizing success rests, in his mind, on factors beyond his control—repression, cowardice, self-interest. He is a confident man. / caldwell/ Other colonizers had more mixed results. Caldwell, a college graduate with a middle-class WASP heritage, recalls that in his initial colonizing effort, "I wasn't very smart and made a lot of stupid mistakes—talked to people, became known as a troublemaker." He was fired. Fortunately for Caldwell, his firing made him a "celebrated case," and the predominantly Irish and Italian Catholic workers, and even the conservative union officials, rallied to his support. Caldwell says that whereas other Party organizers had their best contact in their own departments, he touched bases throughout the plant and often socialized at the local bar to maintain and develop relationships. "A fair number knew I was a Communist," he says. "I never denied it." But most did not. In most plants to admit membership in the Party meant probable firing and certain harassment. For organizers like Caldwell, discretion was the rule. His efforts paid off against the union's local establishment. The national, a left-wing union, sent in an organizer to help fashion a local coalition to defeat the established group, and Caldwell worked with him as elections chairman. The progressive slate was successful. Caldwell, a leader of a left-wing veterans' group, participated in the 1946 strike surge. When mounted police chased people ontoporches in Southwest Philadelphia to break up injunction-defying demonstrations, the local CIO was able to bring out 25,000 workers to protest against police brutality in front of City Hall. But such Popular Front-style unified efforts were shattered by the developing Cold War consensus, which began to drive radicals, particularly Party members, out of the unions. Caldwell shifted jobs in this period, finally taking a full-time organizing job in a nearby industrial town. The plant had some IWO members and a few Party members, but no organization. Caldwell, who observes that "it really became difficult after the Korean War" started, found some success in putting out a small paper and handing it out at the main gates. He worked to develop contacts mainly by distributing the Party paper, first for free, then by subscription. Caldwell remembers proudly that he won a district drive with eighty subscriptions in his area. Gains were modest: a Hungarian sympathizer sent him two black shop stewards; then a few Irish Catholics made contact. Caldwell recalls going into Philadelphia to see prize fights with the latter workers, mixing pleasure with discussions of possible articles about their area for the Party press. But the times wrecked any chance Caldwell had of developing a Party group. The FBI scared off possible sympathizers; he was arrested for circulating antiwar petitions, and the venture finally ended in the heyday of the McCarthy period when Caldwell was sent to join the Party's underground. Caldwell and Al Schwartz experienced the ebb of the progressive union movement in the late forties and early fifties. Most Party labor organizers and colonizers, however, joined the fray during the extraordinary upsurge of the late thirties that established industrial unionism through the CIO. /milt goldberg/ Milt Goldberg, despite winning a Mayor's Scholarship, was unable to continue his education after graduating from Central High School. Instead, he scratched to make a living at odd jobs, gradually becoming interested in radical politics. While he wasworking a pre-Christmas job at Sears, the department store warehousemen went out on strike. Clerks refused to cross the picket lines. Goldberg recalls that the increasingly anxious owners persuaded the clerks to return to work with promises of improved conditions and wage increases that were never fulfilled; meanwhile, the warehousemen settled. In the aftermath, the strike leaders were all fired. Goldberg says that many of them were Communists and that he began to notice how often that was the case: "I respected the Party people; they were able, talented people." Goldberg became an organizer for a white-collar union dominated by mobsters who made deals with management at the expense of the membership. He describes his early efforts as "naive, inexperienced." Goldberg played a key role in leading his membership out of the corrupt union into a new CIO local, whose Philadelphia office staff was dominated by Party organizers. In those days, the late thirties, the era of sit-downs and a crescendo of collective bargaining agreements, organizing was remarkably fluid. Goldberg says that charters were granted easily and with little need for substantiation or the apparatus of negotiation soon to appear under the NLRB. In those days, he asserts with some nostalgia, one could go in and organize a place in one or two days, present demands to the employer, and make a deal. Such rapid victories were, of course, exceptions; Goldberg also recalls the often brutal resistance of management, particularly in heavy industry. After serving in the war, Goldberg returned to his union efforts, despite family advice that he try something more prestigious and lucrative. The union was his life, so he stayed. He never formally rejoined the Party, although he remained in close contact. The Taft-Harley anti-Communist oath soon reinforced this decision. Nevertheless, Goldberg and his small union were red-baited and constantly under McCarthyite attack. How did he survive? Goldberg argues that he "was very close to the membership" and had solid support from his fellow leaders. He emphasizes that the union provided real benefits and servicesto membership and sustained their loyalty despite the attacks. In addition, he notes that by this time the small union did not have a Party group, only him. One of the more damaging policies of Party-dominated unions was what Goldberg calls "the resolution bit"—the passing of Party-sponsored resolutions on every issue from Scottsboro to Spain. Too many left-wing unions manipulated such resolutions without making any effort to educate the membership; all that mattered was that local such-and-such of the so-and-so workers sent a resolution attacking Franco's dictatorship in Spain. Goldberg dropped such tactics in the postwar period, instead working with his local's officers and servicing the practical needs of the membership. By the mid-fifties, still a socialist, Milt Goldberg had become estranged from the Communist Party. As is true of most arts, the qualities that make for a successful organizer are uncertain and descriptions are inevitably cliche-ridden. As the experiences of ny Tisa and Jack Ryan indicate, having roots in the work force being organized gives one a decided advantage. But the Party could use only the troops it had available, and these were for the most part educated, urban, Jewish Americans, most of whom had no experience in the heavy industries that were their "colonies." Most of them experienced frustration; one cadre estimates that 95 percent of all Party colonizers failed. Too often colonizers were unable to operate in a sea of Gentile proletarians. Fred Garst, stillry at the Party for its insensitivity to context, charges that "the Left didn't have any organizing skills." But some organizers, remarkably, succeeded. /ike samuels/ Ike Samuels still speaks with an accent that reveals the years he spent in Eastern Europe before his mother, taking the remains of the family silver, arrived in the United States. No red-diaper baby, Samuels describes his youth as "street-wise" and his ambition as making it in America. Like many others, however, "the whole thing burst into flame" when the Depression forced him to dropout of school and hunger marches, bonus marches, and unemployed council protests acted on his emerging social conscience. Soon he was moving toward the Party and engaging in union organizing. Samuels, a gruff, self-deprecating man who often refers to his "big mouth," rose to leadership within a small craft union and served on the city CIO council. His CIO union was dominated by a Popular Front coalition of the Party and a progressive Catholic group. The union president, a leader of the latter, was incompetent; on several occasions Samuels had to bail him out of collective-bargaining disasters. Finally the Catholic faction and the Party faction sought to replace the president with Samuels. The national Party leadership, however, afraid of upsetting the delicate coalition, said no. Samuels recalls that he "didn't even question" the decision, but he was frustrated and soon left the union to become an organizer for a larger, industrial union. Samuels agrees with Milt Goldberg that it was relatively easy to be a good organizer in that period. Labor was in an upswing, workers were clamoring to be organized, NLRB cards were easy to accumulate. In heavy industry, Samuels stresses, the key was to seek out the pockets of old radical workers—not colonizers, he emphasizes—who had broken down the old ethnic barriers. Many such organizers were members of the IWO foreign-language federations. Next, one needed the "pie-cards," the full-time organizers supplied by the CIO itself, many of whom were veteran radicals. Along with and sometimes among the pie-cards were the younger Communists going into the shops, supported by a growing and confident Party organization. A "highly developed structure," Samuels recalls, was essential to organizing success. One had to develop shop committees and day-to-day contacts in each department. The sense of strength provided by the union itself and, crucially, by its CIO sponsor, allowed workers to imagine that the employers could be successfully challenged. In the automobile, steel, rubber, mining, and electrical equipment industries, workers facedmammoth corporations willing to use any means necessary to throw back the unionist surge. The New Deal, by encouraging a more neutral judiciary and law enforcement role, made it easier for the coordinated CIO drives to gain concessions from corporate heads. Samuels suggests that the workers, some of whom had backed decades of unsuccessful rank-and-file efforts, needed the sense that they were a part of a powerful coalition. L. Lewis appealed to this sense when he proclaimed, "The President want you to join a union." Such a coalition advanced unionization at the same time that it necessitated concessions and strictures that limited the leverage of the newly legitimized unions.=16 Samuels argues that it was imperative for organizers to have knowledge of their industries. He deliberately worked in a craft shop to learn the trade and later carefully studied one heavy industry before going out to organize its workers. He was not typical. Hodee Edwards, a thirties organizer, stresses "our consistent failure to investigate the neighborhoods and factories where we tried to work, thus applying a generalized, sectarian plan usually incomprehensible to those we wanted to reach."=17 And Sam Katz suggests that the Party did not always recognize the tension between the leadership and the activist/organizer over the pace and nature of organizing. The functionaries often pushed for the most advanced positions, including the "resolutions bit," whereas the organizers focused on the issues that confronted their constituents. Conflict was inevitable between broad policy and local needs and variations, and between policy planners and functionaries and field organizers and the rank and file. It is clear that the Communist Party suffered chronically from top-heavy decision making, which often left local organizers and members with policy directives that made little sense in local circumstances. In addition to organizational strength and preparation, Samuels feels that leadership ability and, at times, personal courage must be demonstrated. On several occasions he had to take risks or lose the confidence of his membership. In one local the workers affectionately referred to him as "R.R.J.B.," Red Russian JewBastard. He tells of organizing workers in a small Georgia company town. Fifteen hundred were on strike, and the patriarchal owners were negotiating only under pressure from the NLRB. They were stalling, however, so Samuels called on the work force to increase the pressure by massing outside the building where the negotiations were taking place. The next day, in the midst of bargaining, Samuels noticed the face of the company's attorney turning an ash white as he glanced out the window. What he saw were about three hundred workers marching toward the building carrying a rope; lynching was on their agenda. Samuels went out and calmed them down, "modified" their demands, and then wrapped up negotiations. His early organizing days also included maritime struggles with gangster elements who were not beyond "bumping off" militants. Samuels implies that the Left elements fought back, sometimes resorting to their own brand of physical intimidation.=18 Peggy Dennis describes the Bolshevik ideal as "soldiers in a revolutionary army at permanent war with a powerful class enemy." And "in permanent war, doubts or questions are treason."=19 Yet as Joseph Starobin asks, "How could the Leninist equilibrium be sustained in a country so different from Lenin's?" In fact, it was sustained unevenly and at a price. In a society with a tradition of civil liberties (albeit inconsistently applied and occasionally suspended in moments of stress) and a remarkably resilient political democracy, the Leninist model, hardened and distorted by Stalinism, mixed uncomfortably with American realities.=21 At its best the Leninist ideal encouraged the incredible levels of hard work and perseverance that even critics of Communism grant to its cadres; it also evoked such personal qualities as integrity, courage, honesty, and militancy. Yet the ideal seemed to degenerate too easily into a model of behavior appropriately labeled Stalinist. Communist cadres accepted deceptive tactics and strategies that inevitably backfired and undermined theirintegrity and reputations—for example, the front groups that "flip-flopped" at Party command after years of denying Party domination. The intolerance and viciousness with which Communists often attacked adversaries, including liberals, socialists, and their own heretics, remains inexcusable.=22 As organizers, Communist activists suffered from a tendency toward a special kind of elitism that often made them incapable of working with diverse groups sharing common goals. In some periods they turned this streak of inhumanity against themselves, engaging in ugly campaigns of smear and character assassination to eliminate "Titoists," "Browderites," "revisionists," "left-wing adventurists," or "white chauvinists." Moreover, the secrecy within which Communists often operated, while sometimes justified by the danger of job loss or prosecution, served to undermine the Party's moral legitimacy. An organizer's relationship with his constituents depends on their belief in his integrity, and this is especially true when the organizer is an outsider. Too often, Communists undermined their own integrity by covering manipulative and cynical acts with the quite plausible explanation that survival required secrecy. The tendency of Communists to resort to First and Fifth Amendment protection during the McCarthy period falls under similar challenges. As Joseph Starobin asks: Should left-wingers and Communists have gone to jail in large numbers? Might they have been better off/politically/, in terms of their/image/, to assert their affiliations, to proclaim them instead of asserting their right to keep them private, to explain the issues as they saw them, and to take the consequences?=23 Communist activists certainly did not lack courage or commitment to a protracted struggle. Many risked prison, and some served prison sentences; perhaps as many as one-third of the cadres painfully accepted assignments to go underground in the early fifties. Their Leninism had to navigate contradictory currents of Stalinism and Americanization, militancy and opportunism. Local Communist activists often lived a somewhat schizophrenic life, alternately internationalist and indigenous, Bolshevik and "progressive," admiring the Leninist model of cadre and yet falling into more settled, familial patterns of activism. There was a clear if often ignored sexual division of labor: men were more likely to be the cadres, women performed auxiliary clerical functions and unnoticed but essential neighborhood organizing. The Party was also divided between theorists and intellectuals on the one hand and field workers and activists on the other. As one field worker proclaimed, "I couldn't be spending hours on ideological conflicts; I'm an activist, not an intellectual." Many agree that the bulk of an organizer's time went into local actions and much less went into discussions and considerations of important theoretical or programmatic matters.=24 Only a small proportion received the type of ideological and intellectual training suggested by the Leninist ideal, an ideal that formally sought the obliteration of the distinctions between thought and action, intellectual and activist. In fact, Party intellectuals faced chronic and ingrained suspicion, even contempt, from Party leaders. Abe Shapiro sardonically charges that the function of Party intellectuals was "to sell the/Daily Worker/at the waterfront." He remembers checking on a new Party document on the economy: "I actually read the document. I wanted to know what the Hell it was." He found it infantile and far below what well-trained but never used Party intellectuals and social scientists could have produced. The Party rarely, except for showcase purposes, relied on its trained intellectual or academic members; instead, it called on Party functionaries, often of very narrow training, to write about complex sociological, economic, and scientific matters. Theory suffered as a result, and the Party, particularly after 1939, included very few intellectuals. Until the mid-fifties crisis, the Party, strangled by Stalinist dogma and intolerance, was closed to intellectual discourse. Abe Shapiro finally left the Party because his intellectual training hadgiven him a commitment to intellectual honesty that he could not shake. Among organizers, Party arrogance cut off messages from the grass roots. Orders from what one veteran calls "the Cave of Winds"—Party headquarters in New York—often contradicted practical organizing experience. The Party also suffered from insularity. Mark Greenly brought interested fellow workers to a Party-dominated union meeting. They were curious and "antiboss" but quite unsophisticated and not at all ready to make any commitments. Unfortunately, the Party organizer immediately started to discuss class struggle and a variety of abstract political matters. The workers were quickly alienated and frightened away, never to return. Ethel Paine recalls such "inappropriate behavior" as the sectarian conversations Party people would carry on in the presence of non-Communist acquaintances and neighbors. Although chronically secretive about membership, Communists could be remarkably insensitive to their audience in revealing ways. A successful organizer learned when and how to introduce more controversial ideas to nonmembers. Training, including the Party schools, helped to some extent, but most Communists agree with the veteran organizer who feels that such learning has to be done on the job, by trial and error. Many Communists, like Sam Katz and Caldwell, tell painful if sometimes hilarious tales of their own and others' ineptitude as beginning organizers. Some discovered that they simply were not suited for the job and would never develop the personal qualities that make for a competent organizer. Several veterans insist that organizers are born, not made. Yet relatively introverted and socially awkward young people, inspired by the idealism and the comradeship of the Communist movement, did transform themselves into effective organizers. Vivian Gornick points out that such transformations did not always survive the collapse of association with the Party.=25 I did not, however, discover total or near total personality changes caused either by joining or abandoning the Party. Although most of the literature about radical organizers deals with men, it is increasingly apparent that some of the mostsignificant and consistently ignored organizing within the Communist Party involved women. The ten women interviewed performed a rich variety of Party tasks, but perhaps the most important were those not officially designated, like the informal neighborhood activities organized by Edith Samuels, described inChapter Five . Sarah Levy was also involved in such efforts. Sarah and her two children joined her colonizer husband, Moe, in leaving the comfortable Party concentration in the Strawberry Mansion section to live in a nearby industrial town. She refers to the next three and a half years as "not the easiest times and, yet to me, personally, one of the best growing experiences—and I have never regretted it." (Moe's wry rejoinder was "She didn't have to work the blast furnaces.") There were only three Party families in the town, quite a difference from the thirty or forty Party friends they left behind in Strawberry Mansion. While Moe worked the furnaces and tried to develop contacts with plant workers, Sarah joined a folk dance group at the local "Y," where she got to know Greek, Yugoslav, Italian, and other immigrant women. Moe, limited in the plant to a small Party circle of colonizers and sympathizers, was able to socialize with the husbands of Sarah's folk dancing partners. Colonizers often ended up working with a local Party apparatus while their wives, working through neighborhood networks, reached into the community through its women, older people, and children. Asie Repice casually but proudly concluded about her work with a community center during the war years; "I am an organizer, so I organized a nursery." Her husband was in the service. Moving around to stay close to his base, she put her organizing abilities and political values to work. Such efforts remain an unwritten chapter in the history of radical organizing.=26 */functionaries/* Few district functionaries other than Sam Darcy achieved any national stature or had much leverage outside the district. Dave Davis, the business manager of UE Local 155 and an importantPhiladelphia-area labor leader, was often elected to the Party's national committee but never entered the inner decision-making group. Other district leaders—like Pat Toohey, Phil Bart, Phil Frankfeld, and Ed Strong—were D.O.s sent into the district and then moved out again to other assignments. Most district functionaries played dominant roles within the district committee and ran such important Party operations as the local Progressive Party and the Civil Rights Congress. They drew meager salaries, which were sometimes supplemented by Party-related employment. The Party network, at least during the late thirties and forties, could place members in some union jobs.=27 Possibly several dozen members depended on the Party for their livelihood in this way. */nonmembers/* One often encounters Communists who, for very specific reasons, were not formal Party members. One former Progressive Party leader never joined the Party but worked closely with district Communist leaders to map strategy and coordinate activity. Some union leaders stayed out of the Party to deny employers the red-baiting weapon, and a number dropped out after the Taft-Hartley Act made a union officer liable to prosecution for perjury if he lied about current Party membership.=28 */professionals/* Some professionals who joined the Party operated at a rank-and-file level, belonging to a professional branch or club, attending meetings, and fulfilling subscription quotas. Several recall being highly impressed with the other professionals they met at Party functions. But such members—often doctors, dentists, and architects—were on the margins of Party life. Many professionals, especially lawyers associated with Party causes, found membership problematic and chose not to formalize their relationships with the Party, though they might be members of a professional club. "I fought against loose tongues," one states."I never asked a soul whether they were Communists or not." Several left-wing attorneys stress that they did not want to be in a position to betray anyone or risk a perjury charge if questioned about their own affiliations and associations. The law in America is a conservative profession, and several Left lawyers paid a high price for their efforts.=29 Another consideration was that the Party sometimes pressured lawyers to use a particular legal strategy in Party-related cases, and such pressure was more effectively applied to members.=30 One attorney notes that the Party itself seemed ambivalent about requiring formal membership. A few district leaders pressured him to join, while others understood that it was not particularly useful or necessary. Some lawyers, whether members or not, found their services very much in demand. They were needed in labor negotiations, electoral activities, and civil rights and civil liberties cases. In the late forties and early fifties, Party-affiliated lawyers found it less easy than it had been to earn a living through Party-based clients, such as left-wing unions. Instead they were called upon to deal with the titanic task of defending Party members indicted under the Smith Act and other pieces of repressive legislation. Thanks to this demand, as one attorney suggests, they received special treatment from the district leadership. They mixed with labor leaders, politicians, judges, and, at times, the national Party leadership. Several had more contact with the non-Communist local authorities than district functionaries had. One left-wing attorney recalls that he had the luxury of criticizing Party policies and decisions, within limits, because "I was needed, I was special, a lawyer." More significant than membership was the degree of autonomy a member had, and this was based on his importance to the Party or his institutional leverage. A professional could get away with criticism of the Nazi-Soviet Pact that would not be tolerated from rank-and-filers or most cadres. A union leader could ignore Party instructions, aware that his own organization was his power base. A former Communist, George Charney, criticizes in his memoirsthe "left-wing aristocracy of labor that rarely mingled with the herd of party members or the middle functionaries."=31 Such trade-unions "influentials" often had contempt for functionaries and would go over their heads to top leadership. Those who entered the Party, at whatever level, in whatever role, operated within a well-defined organization and lived within a somewhat insular and often nurturing subculture that provided them with formal and informal relationships. These relationships eased the often lonely organizing work. One veteran unashamedly calls his fellow Communist organizers "the most dedicated, most selfless people in the struggle." Many would share Jessica Mitford's feelings: I had regarded joining the Party as one of the most important decisions of my adult life. I loved and admired the people in it, and was more than willing to accept the leadership of those far more experienced than I. Furthermore, the principle of democratic centralism seemed to me essential to the functioning of a revolutionary organization in a hostile world.=32 Any tendency to romanticize such activists must be tempered by an awareness of their mistakes, limitations, and weaknesses, and it is true that many non-Communists made similar commitments to organizing the oppressed and the weak. They too merit consideration. These Philadelphia veterans of the Communist Party are very human actors who worked on a particular historical stage. Some conclude that their years of effort never really brought any of their factory and shop constituents into the movement. Like Sol Davis, they admit that they were utter failures in that "cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland" of blue-collar America. Others share the pride, perhaps the arrogance, of one of Vivian Gornick's subjects: We're everywhere, everywhere. We/saved/this f--king country. We went to Spain, and because we did America understood fascism. We made Vietnam come to an end, we're in there inWatergate. We built the CIO, we got Roosevelt elected, we started black civil rights, we forced this sh-tty country into every piece of action and legislation it has ever taken. We did the dirty work and the Labor and Capital establishments got the rewards. The Party helped make democracy work.=33 The road from Spain to Watergate is a long one. Communists, euphoric at their prospects in the heyday of CIO sit-downs and Popular Front triumphs, later needed remarkable inner resources to sustain political activity. They sensed the first tremors from the purge trials, received a severe jolt from the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, and in the postwar years faced first political repression and then, more painfully, internal disintegration and demoralization. NEXT CHAPTER seven: problems and crises, 1939–1956 the founder of Black Lives Matter once described herself as a trained , like Obama, but I could only find this: https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ On 10/17/22 10:32 someone wrote:
Since many believe Obama is running the Marxist Biden administration We might want to look at a history of comnunist organizing, euphemistically called a community organizing https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/philadelphia-communists-1936-1956/section/c5cbd6e3-ed24-4bcb-97b0-da424fc58416 */the communist as organizer/* In the period between the Great Crash and the McCarthy era the CPUSA was the most effective organizing agency within the American experience.^1 In this most politically stable of societies, radicals have usually battered their heads against the stone wall of affluence, rising expectations, and Democratic Party loyalty. Within the narrow space of agitation allowed by the political order, Communist Party activists built a small but influential organization devoted to organizing constituencies for social change. According to even the most unsympathetic accounts, Communist activists played important roles in organizing the unemployed, evicted tenants, minorities, and workers in a wide variety of fields. They were central in the emergence of the CIO and thus in the organizing of workers in heavy industry and mass production; they spearheaded the defense of the right of black people to equality before the law and social and economic opportunity; and they participated in virtually all of the nationalefforts to establish humane social services and eliminate hunger, disease, and neglect from our communities.^2 Many analysts question the motives of Communist Party activists, and there certainly is controversy about the extent of their organizing successes. Nevertheless, Communist organizing merits serious and objective consideration. For a period of approximately thirty years, Communist Party activists and organizers sought out constituents in the mines, plants, and neighborhoods of the United States. Other left-wing groups, such as the Socialist Party, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party, and A. J. Muste's Workers Party, also deserve study, but the CPUSA offers students the best opportunity to examine the dynamics of organizing sponsored and directed by a radical political group.^3 The organizers under consideration came to political maturity during the 1930s, mostly in an era associated with the Popular Front, and remained within the Party until at least the mid-Fifties. Indeed, many remained active organizers and participants after leaving the organizational framework of the Communist Party. In the thirties and forties, they modified their Bolshevik rhetoric and participated in antifascist alliances, worked for modest short-term successes within the fledgling CIO, and provided support and manpower for a diverse group of radical and progressive political movements and leaders, including Democrats, Farmer-Laborites, the American Labor Party in New York, and Communist Party councilmen in New York City, all under an essentially New Deal banner.^4 Organizers operating in the greater Philadelphia district had important trade-union successes and played a key role in organizing unemployed councils, electoral efforts, tenant rights, and peace, professional lobbying, civil liberties, ethnically based, and neighborhood groups. For a period of approximately ten years, from 1936 to perhaps 1947, the Communist Party of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, District Three, played an important if modest role in the political life of the area, generating ideas, programs, and visions that later became the commonplaces of social policy. The Party offered its membership several roles. One could remain at the rank-and-file level, become a cadre, or rise to functionary. One could engage in mass work within one of the Party fronts or a non-Party organization (e.g., the YMCA) or one could become a "colonizer," engaging in industrial organizing at the beck and call of the Party. In addition, one could work within the professional section, providing the Party with such services as legal counsel.^5 */rank and file/* At the lowest level of Party membership were the rank and file, the proverbial "Jimmy Higginses" who worked within Party clubs and branches, paid their dues, went to a variety of meetings, and joined the mass organizations and fronts, often focusing on a specific issue like Spain, civil rights, or Scottsboro. Such rank-and-filers were at the heart of everyday activities and what Gornick calls "grinding ordinariness."^6 There was an extraordinary turnover among such members, who often became weary of meetings,/Daily Worker/solicitations, and office chores. Many rank-and-filers began their activism while in college or sometimes high school. The Philadelphia high school movement was quite sizable, including ASU and YCL chapters in at least eight schools. High school activists ranged throughout the city, meeting radical peers, socializing, and developing their own circle of comrades. For those who entered college either already active or about to be radicalized, there was an almost dizzying flow of activities, including demonstrations, marches, sit-downs, leaflettings, fundraisers, dances, parties, socials, lectures, speeches—and meetings. Always, there were meetings, one for every night of the week, often more.^7 Enthusiastic, recently converted Communists, like their spiritual children in the 1960s, had unbounded energy for political work. Most speak of being aroused and inspired by their sense of the significance of their efforts, the quality of their comrades, and the grandeur and power of their movement. Abe Shapiro recalls being engrossed at one time in the following activities: formal YCL meetings, ASU leadership, a universityantiwar council (of which he was director), Spanish civil war relief efforts, a variety of antifascist activities, a student-run bookstore cooperative, and support work for assorted civil liberties and civil rights causes. Some activists found schoolwork boring under the circumstances and devoted all of their time to politics. A few became "colonizers." In most cases, however, Communist students completed their degree work, and if they dropped out of school, it was often for financial reasons. For most, the excitement of campus politics held their attention and their interest. Some found Party youth work a path toward leadership, becoming citywide or national ASU or YCL leaders. Others on leaving campus became YCL branch or section organizers in different parts of the district. Many who did not attend college did neighborhood work with the YCL, often focusing their mass organizational efforts through the American League for Peace and Democracy. To many youthful rank-and-filers, "the YCL became . . . Marxist-Leninist theory all mixed up with baseball, screwing, dancing, selling the/Daily Worker/, bullsh-tting, and living the American-Jewish street life."^8 Certainly the first flush of radicalism, the emotional high of purposeful activity, the sense of accomplishment and of sacrifice for the good of humanity, the work with fine and noble comrades, the love affairs with those sharing a common vision, the expectation that the future was indeed theirs, created a honeymoon effect for most young Communists. For some, the fad of radicalism passed upon graduation or thereabouts. Others simply maintained a regular but distant "fellow-traveling" role as they entered the work world. And many were disillusioned by the Party's dogmatism or the great purge trials, the attacks on Trotsky, or the Non-Aggression Pact of 1939. Others, including those interviewed, remained in the Party. The shortest stay was six years, and most remained loyal for twenty years or more. For all of those who stayed, the Party and its small subculture became their lives. Those working at the branch, club, and section levels were rarely on the Party payroll and had to find work to supportthemselves. For single people problems were few and life could be lived at a double-time pace, working hard all day and then organizing and holding meetings every night. Some young Communists drifted for a time after school, doing Party work but not settling into anything. Ben Green lived in Strawberry Mansion, a lower-middle- and working-class Jewish neighborhood filled with Party people at the time. He did some work with the American League Against War and Fascism, spoke on street corners occasionally, went to three to four meetings a week, and helped to start a union local of public employees at his Works Progress Administration (WPA) office. He remembers that the Party "made it a big thing" when he shifted from the YCL to adult membership, but he was still looking at his future with uncertainty. Upon completing high school, George Paine felt that "sports were gone" from his life except for an occasional neighborhood basketball game. He kept in touch but saw less of old non-Party buddies and did standard political work, "hustling the paper," going to meetings, demonstrating. Finally he decided to go to college, suspending but not ending his Party ties. One rank-and-filer was a skilled craftsman, "glad of the class I was born into." He belonged to a conservative craft union and limited his political work to mass work at the local YMCA. He never really got involved with a club or branch group but paid his dues, subscribed to the paper, and worked with comrades to move the "Y" in a more "progressive" direction. He was quite open about his views, which would eventually get him into trouble at his job: "I felt that since to me everything was so clear, they'd hug me." Tim Palen, a farmer and skilled craftsman who lived in a rural suburb of Philadelphia, worked with the Farmers Union. A Party rank-and-filer, he helped farmers get low-interest loans through the union and sympathetic banks. Palen never involved himself with Party affairs in the city, and the highest office he held was dues secretary of his section. Since the Communist Party did not formally label members according to their rank, it is not always clear who was a rank-and-filer and who was considered cadre. One former district leader defines cadres as the people in training for leadership, like officers in an army. The rank and file are, therefore, foot soldiers, less involved and more a part of their own neighborhood or plant, more likely to hold conventional jobs, and more subject to pressures from neighbors, family, and changing circumstances. Annie Kriegel, who analyzes the French Communist Party as a set of concentric circles, places fellow travelers who vote for the Party and read the Sunday Party press on the "outer circle" and "ordinary party members" in the "first circle."^9 Many observers describe such rank-and-filers as less "Bolshevik"—that is, more likely to break Party discipline in everyday activity and closer to the behavior and sensibilities of their non-Party peers. Harvey Klehr puts it, "Many party members received no training of any kind, attendance at party meetings was often spotty, and members frequently ignored or failed to carry out assigned tasks."^10 Almond presents esoteric and exoteric models to distinguish rank-and-filer from cadre, suggesting that the Party daily press directed itself to the relatively idealistic and naive external members, while the Comintern, Cominform, and internal Party journals spoke to insiders and sophisticated activists.^11 */cadre/* The cadre has a "personal commitment." He or she is a "true Bolshevik," internally Communized, with an almost priestly function and sense of specialness. The cadre is a "professional revolutionary" along Leninist lines.^12 Philip Selznick adds that cadres are "deployable personnel," available to the Party at all times.^13 Some observers use "cadre" interchangeably with "functionary," while others distinguish them. I interpret "functionary" as a more administrative and executive role, usually carrying more authority and generally associated with top district and national leadership.^14 Cadres were field workers, organizers, sometimes on the payroll but often holding a non-Party job. Some more mobile cadres lefttheir own neighborhoods, but most worked at least within their home districts. (Functionaries, on the other hand, could be homegrown and district-bound or at the service of the national, even international, office.) Many studies exaggerate the distinction between inner core and outer rings because of their dependence on the abstractions of Party tracts. Almond, for example, claims that the "true Communist" was beyond any commitment to the Popular Front since he was presumably fully Bolshevized and aware of the duplicity and tactical nature of moderated rhetoric. Perhaps this is true of the national leadership, who had associations with Moscow, training at the Lenin School, and Comintern experience. At the district level, however, the patterns are not as clear and seem to be more sensitive to generational, class, and ethnic variables.^15 Among informants, the word "cadre" connoted "hard-working," "brave," "dogged," and "honorable"—someone who followed a Leninist model of behavior; "functionary," on the other hand, was often used negatively to imply that someone was "bureaucratic," "aloof," "abstract," and "remote from struggle"—in brief, the Stalinist/apparatchik/. Neither necessarily belonged to an inner core. Fred Garst tells of the "process of indoctrination" he underwent as he entered into Party life, beginning with "the regularity of systematic participation"—dues, meetings, selling Party literature. He says that the number of meetings began slowly to escalate to three, sometimes five a week: section and subsection meetings, executive meetings, front meetings. Next, Garst was asked to lead a discussion, then to take responsibility for organizing the distribution of literature. He started taking classes at a local Workers School in Marxist theory and labor history. His commitment grew, his experience deepened, and he soon became a section leader. Some Philadelphia Communists moved from rank-and-file to cadre roles during important political campaigns like theProgressive Party efforts of 1947–1948. One woman had been serving in a minor capacity—"not anything earth-shattering"—but was swept up by what Wallace referred to as "Gideon's Army." She became a full-time Progressive Party organizer at a district level, her "first real organizing"; from that point on, she was fully involved in Party work at a variety of levels. Some cadres emphasized front and mass work, serving as leaders of IWO ethnic groups, youth groups, and defense groups. Such cadres were particularly likely to operate clandestinely, although many communicated their affilitation all but formally to constituents. Cadres can be distinguished by their level of operation (club, branch, section, or district), by their funding (on the payroll or holding a regular job), by their relative mobility and willingness to do political work outside their own milieu, and, finally, by the type of organizing they did (mass or front work, electoral party work, industrial organizing). The most prestigious cadres were those who did full-time industrial organizing at the will of the Party leadership. Such organizers, whether of working-class origins or not and whether indigenous or colonizers, were the heart of Party operations, seeking to develop a proletarian constituency and a trade-union base. /ny tisa/ ny Tisa's history shows what an experienced organizer could accomplish. Tisa, a second-generation son of illiterate, working-class peasants, went to work at the Campbell's Soup plant in his own South Camden "Little Italy" after completing high school in the early 1930s. While working summers at the plant, he had been stimulated by street-corner radical speakers and had joined the Socialist Party, which had a presence at Campbell's Soup. The Socialists sent him to Brookwood Labor College, where he met young Communists who impressed him with their earnestness and apparent lack of factionalism, a problem he encountered among the Socialists. He returned to help organize the plant, starting with a small group of about a half-dozen Italian workers, none of themCommunists, whom he molded through a discussion group. His group received a federal charter from the American Federation of Labor and began to develop an underground, dues-paying membership. Tisa tells of frustrating experiences within the conservative AFL. At the 1939 convention in Tampa, for example, he found himself accidently strolling into a local walk-out of Del Monte workers, just as the police were arresting the leader. He spoke to thery workers and was himself threatened with arrest. The workers exclaimed, "You got Bo [the arrested leader] but you're not gonna get him," and made a ring to escort Tisa to a streetcar. That evening, at his suggestion, there was a union meeting, packed and excited. When Tisa tried to speak about this remarkable experience at the AFL convention, he was refused the floor. Finally he simply took over the podium and microphone. Later that day, he met with other militants, including Communists, to organize the ClO-affiliated Food, Tobacco and Agricultural Workers Union. He took a detour, however, as events in Spain captured his energies and idealism. Tisa served two years in Spain with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, gaining "a sense of internationalism that never escapes you." On his return, he immediately set out to organize Campbell's Soup. At the time Tisa began to organize it, Campbell's Soup employed about 5,500 full-time workers, with another 5,000 part-timers who came in during the heavy season. At least half the workers were of Italian descent; there were few blacks until the late 1940s. About half the work force was female. There was a sexual division of labor based on physical strength. Tisa's organizing group consisted of eleven or twelve key workers, all leftists, mostly Italian. None were "colonizers." All were indigenous workers who, under Tisa's leadership, planned the unionization of Campbell's. Tisa recalls that the group would often go crabbing and then return to his home to eat, drink, and talk strategy. Tisa was the only member of the group on the national union's payroll; he made a bare ten or fifteen dollars a week. The organizers distributed themselves through the plant, reaching out to obvious sympathizers and picking up useful information that they would relay to Tisa, who could not enter the plant. He would take names and visit workers in their homes, signing them up so that the union could hold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election. He would also cull information about working conditions from his organizers and publish it in a union bulletin that they distributed clandestinely, each carrying five to ten copies. As their numbers increased, they became bolder and distributed the much discussed bulletin openly. Campbell's Soup had Tisa arrested once, but when he was released, many workers came to greet him. He assured them that the law permitted them to organize a union. The company tried many tactics to block his efforts: they started a company union; they charged that he was a "Red" and had raped nuns and killed priests in Spain. But Tisa lived in an Italian neighborhood among plant workers and had a mother who had worked in the plant for many years (cheering his speeches, often at the wrong times, he wryly and lovingly notes); he could not be red-baited easily. He was an open Communist; his neighbors would say, "ny's a Communist, but he's all right." Despite the real barrier of the workers'traditional Catholicism, he produced traditional trade-union benefits for members and was popular enough locally, a neighbor, to remain in leadership until the CIO purges of the late forties and early fifties finally forced him out. Tisa's experience highlights the importance of developing indigenous personnel in organizing activity. His efforts were certainly bolstered by support from the national union, by Communist Party training and aid, and by the relative benevolence of the federal government as expressed through the new NLRB. Yet the presence of local activists, something the Communist Party sought but did not often achieve, invariably made the task of organizing a plant or neighborhood that much easier. Other organizers performed similar roles without formally entering the Party, preferring to remain independent although generally taking positions consistent with Party policy. /jack ryan/ Jack Ryan's old man was "a union man," later a foreman, a local Democratic politician, and a bootlegger. As a teen-ager, and a high school drop-out, Ryan ran poker and crap games in the neighborhood with a group of friends, some of whom wound up in prison. He worked sporadically as a roofer, during which time he was influenced by a socialist "who couldn't read or write until he was twenty-three." His father finally got him a job at a local plant, where he worked as a crane operator in the early Depression years until he was laid off in 1931. Over the next two years, he tried a small store and "managed to hang on," selling water ice and running crap games. In 1933 he went back to the plant just at the point when the local union was being formed. Ryan recalls that he was "sworn in in an elevator with the lights out in between the floors." Despite his emerging radical politics, Ryan remained on the margins at first. "I deliberately didn't get active," he says, indicating that life seemed too unpredictable to take chances. In fact, he entered into a real-estate business on the side, and it eventually provided him with the cushion that allowed him to become more active within the plant. Initially he ran for the general committee, backed by the other crane operators because of his successful grievance work. Still cautious ("I kept my mouth shut," he notes), Ryan went along with the conservative local leadership while maintaining contact with the plant militants, several of whom were old Wobblies suspicious of any Communist Party leadership. Ryan worked primarily through his own crane operators' network within the plant. He played the trade-offs in union posts among the plant's crafts to become local president, an unpaid post, and finally business representative, the only salaried position within the local. Ryanremained close to the Party but never joined. "I was more radical than they were," he brags. He criticizes their twists and turns and suggests that "in the end you can't trust any of them" because of "the goddamn line." He adds that the/Daily Worker/was "written for a bunch of morons." On the other hand, Ryan admits that Party union members were often competent and successful organizers and that he agreed with most of their Popular Front stances, particularly their antifascism. On the Soviets, he says that he did not spend too much time thinking about them, but adds, "I don't blame them for having a treaty with the Germans." Ryan is clearly concerned with the practical issues of trade unionism. In describing one of his national officers, he exclaims, "A dedicated Communist but a helluva guy." He praises L. Lewis's efforts at industrial unionization: "him and the Commies put together the CIO; they were the smartest crowd." So Jack Ryan worked with but kept some distance from "the Commies": "they were a little bit nutty." His union was one of those expelled from the CIO in the late forties, and he remains bitter about the Party's role in the union's decline. He remained active, holding union office on and off until his retirement. Ryan proudly concludes that he was placed on Social Security while on strike for the last time in the early seventies. ny Tisa and Jack Ryan were working-class organizers, with roots in their ethnic communities, able to establish a rapport with their peers and, at the same time, develop more sophisticated skills within a broader and more ideological movement in or around the Communist Party. Their failures were mostly exogenous, the results of Taft-Hartley oaths, CIO purges, and McCarthyism in general. Others operated in less favorable terrain, without the decided advantages of an indigenous, working-class background. The most characteristic Party labor organizer was a young, educated, second-generation Jewish-American sent to "dig roots into the working-class." The efforts of such organizers were prodigious; their accomplishments, however, were more problematic. /al schwartz/ Al Schwartz's father was a 1905er, a Party organizer in the garment industry who had to open a small shop after he was blacklisted. Al, a classic "red-diaper baby," went through all of the Party developmental steps, from Young Pioneers through YCL to full Party involvement. Most of all he wanted to be a radical journalist. For a few years he was able to work on the Pennsylvania supplement to the/Worker/, but when it folded, his journalism career seemed over. Over the next half-dozen years, Schwartz, now in his late twenties, went into the shops as a "colonizer." He remembers the sense of adventure and mission he felt working at a few of the larger heavy industrial plants in the area. Yet he also speaks of his sense of loss and defeat in having to aban hopes of writing. Schwartz's response to colonizing was painfully ambivalent: a college graduate and a Jew, born and bred within the Yiddish-Left subculture, he both relished the contact with blue-collar workers and remained distant from them. They were not like him, he stresses; they were mired in back-breaking labor, poor educations, and plebian forms of leisure. For a time he enjoyed the camaraderie of the local taverns, but ultimately he was an outsider, a Jewish family man and a struggling intellectual. Schwartz most fondly recalls the hardness and fitness of his body, the feeling that he was young and strong and physically a worker. But the successes were few, and later the McCarthy period made such Party efforts even more marginal. Schwartz found himself a family man in his mid-thirties without a career or a profession; frustrated and drifting out of Party life without drama or flourish, he moved to reorganize his life. His political values held, but his colonizing days were over. /sol davis/ Sol Davis grew up in a poor, working-class, immigrant household. He was a bright young boy, and like many other upwardly aspiring Jewish males, he flourished at the elite Central High School andbegan moving toward a professional career. At this point, in the early years of the Depression, he was swept off his feet, as he puts it, by the Communist Party. After completing his schooling, he worked lackadaisically at his profession while seeking an opportunity to go into the shops as a Communist Party organizer; he was "determined to be shop worker." His first attempts allowed him to learn something about machinery, although in each instance he was fired for his inexperience and incompetence. Finally he caught on. "I was in my element," he asserts, describing the war years in heavy industry. For Davis, the good organizer had to have a commitment to "the principles of Communism," "a talent for leadership," and a willingness to listen. A confident speaker, whose words are clipped and terse, he worked twenty-nine years in the shops, twenty-six of them at one plant. Located within the city, the plant was staffed mostly by Catholic workers (Polish or Irish), initially few blacks, and even fewer Jews. Davis's recollections are filled with bitter refrains about red-baiting and "turn-coat ex-CPers," sell-outs and "social democrats." He is proud of his successes, which include chairing the grievance committee and serving as shop steward during most of his union years. Davis presents his life as devoted to organizing in the shops; he never got involved in his neighborhood and tended to leave Party electoral work to others. A hard-line orthodox Communist still, Davis argues that those who abandoned the Party were "petty-bourgeois with petty-bourgeois ideas," whereas he "was nursed out of the trade-union movement." In the fifties, he admits, "life became unpleasant," both in his largely Jewish lower-middle-class neighborhood and in the shop, where "a certain resistance developed to my activity" among people he calls anti-Communist socialists. Davis believes that most American workers have been bought off in "discrete and discernible fashion" by imperialist profits, manipulated by the mass media, and blinded by nationalism, religion, and racism. After spending almost thirty years in theindustrial heartland, Davis remains "dedicated to an idea," an "unquestioned belief" in communism. Yet when asked about his ability to convert workers to class consciousness, a saddened Sol Davis replies, "Never—the shop was a desert for me." He did not convert a single worker and was "in that respect an utter failure." The shops, to the stoical Davis, were "a cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland despite having made so many friends." Sol Davis has kept the faith since he was "baptized" in the movement; his singular lack of organizing success rests, in his mind, on factors beyond his control—repression, cowardice, self-interest. He is a confident man. / caldwell/ Other colonizers had more mixed results. Caldwell, a college graduate with a middle-class WASP heritage, recalls that in his initial colonizing effort, "I wasn't very smart and made a lot of stupid mistakes—talked to people, became known as a troublemaker." He was fired. Fortunately for Caldwell, his firing made him a "celebrated case," and the predominantly Irish and Italian Catholic workers, and even the conservative union officials, rallied to his support. Caldwell says that whereas other Party organizers had their best contact in their own departments, he touched bases throughout the plant and often socialized at the local bar to maintain and develop relationships. "A fair number knew I was a Communist," he says. "I never denied it." But most did not. In most plants to admit membership in the Party meant probable firing and certain harassment. For organizers like Caldwell, discretion was the rule. His efforts paid off against the union's local establishment. The national, a left-wing union, sent in an organizer to help fashion a local coalition to defeat the established group, and Caldwell worked with him as elections chairman. The progressive slate was successful. Caldwell, a leader of a left-wing veterans' group, participated in the 1946 strike surge. When mounted police chased people ontoporches in Southwest Philadelphia to break up injunction-defying demonstrations, the local CIO was able to bring out 25,000 workers to protest against police brutality in front of City Hall. But such Popular Front-style unified efforts were shattered by the developing Cold War consensus, which began to drive radicals, particularly Party members, out of the unions. Caldwell shifted jobs in this period, finally taking a full-time organizing job in a nearby industrial town. The plant had some IWO members and a few Party members, but no organization. Caldwell, who observes that "it really became difficult after the Korean War" started, found some success in putting out a small paper and handing it out at the main gates. He worked to develop contacts mainly by distributing the Party paper, first for free, then by subscription. Caldwell remembers proudly that he won a district drive with eighty subscriptions in his area. Gains were modest: a Hungarian sympathizer sent him two black shop stewards; then a few Irish Catholics made contact. Caldwell recalls going into Philadelphia to see prize fights with the latter workers, mixing pleasure with discussions of possible articles about their area for the Party press. But the times wrecked any chance Caldwell had of developing a Party group. The FBI scared off possible sympathizers; he was arrested for circulating antiwar petitions, and the venture finally ended in the heyday of the McCarthy period when Caldwell was sent to join the Party's underground. Caldwell and Al Schwartz experienced the ebb of the progressive union movement in the late forties and early fifties. Most Party labor organizers and colonizers, however, joined the fray during the extraordinary upsurge of the late thirties that established industrial unionism through the CIO. /milt goldberg/ Milt Goldberg, despite winning a Mayor's Scholarship, was unable to continue his education after graduating from Central High School. Instead, he scratched to make a living at odd jobs, gradually becoming interested in radical politics. While he wasworking a pre-Christmas job at Sears, the department store warehousemen went out on strike. Clerks refused to cross the picket lines. Goldberg recalls that the increasingly anxious owners persuaded the clerks to return to work with promises of improved conditions and wage increases that were never fulfilled; meanwhile, the warehousemen settled. In the aftermath, the strike leaders were all fired. Goldberg says that many of them were Communists and that he began to notice how often that was the case: "I respected the Party people; they were able, talented people." Goldberg became an organizer for a white-collar union dominated by mobsters who made deals with management at the expense of the membership. He describes his early efforts as "naive, inexperienced." Goldberg played a key role in leading his membership out of the corrupt union into a new CIO local, whose Philadelphia office staff was dominated by Party organizers. In those days, the late thirties, the era of sit-downs and a crescendo of collective bargaining agreements, organizing was remarkably fluid. Goldberg says that charters were granted easily and with little need for substantiation or the apparatus of negotiation soon to appear under the NLRB. In those days, he asserts with some nostalgia, one could go in and organize a place in one or two days, present demands to the employer, and make a deal. Such rapid victories were, of course, exceptions; Goldberg also recalls the often brutal resistance of management, particularly in heavy industry. After serving in the war, Goldberg returned to his union efforts, despite family advice that he try something more prestigious and lucrative. The union was his life, so he stayed. He never formally rejoined the Party, although he remained in close contact. The Taft-Harley anti-Communist oath soon reinforced this decision. Nevertheless, Goldberg and his small union were red-baited and constantly under McCarthyite attack. How did he survive? Goldberg argues that he "was very close to the membership" and had solid support from his fellow leaders. He emphasizes that the union provided real benefits and servicesto membership and sustained their loyalty despite the attacks. In addition, he notes that by this time the small union did not have a Party group, only him. One of the more damaging policies of Party-dominated unions was what Goldberg calls "the resolution bit"—the passing of Party-sponsored resolutions on every issue from Scottsboro to Spain. Too many left-wing unions manipulated such resolutions without making any effort to educate the membership; all that mattered was that local such-and-such of the so-and-so workers sent a resolution attacking Franco's dictatorship in Spain. Goldberg dropped such tactics in the postwar period, instead working with his local's officers and servicing the practical needs of the membership. By the mid-fifties, still a socialist, Milt Goldberg had become estranged from the Communist Party. As is true of most arts, the qualities that make for a successful organizer are uncertain and descriptions are inevitably cliche-ridden. As the experiences of ny Tisa and Jack Ryan indicate, having roots in the work force being organized gives one a decided advantage. But the Party could use only the troops it had available, and these were for the most part educated, urban, Jewish Americans, most of whom had no experience in the heavy industries that were their "colonies." Most of them experienced frustration; one cadre estimates that 95 percent of all Party colonizers failed. Too often colonizers were unable to operate in a sea of Gentile proletarians. Fred Garst, stillry at the Party for its insensitivity to context, charges that "the Left didn't have any organizing skills." But some organizers, remarkably, succeeded. /ike samuels/ Ike Samuels still speaks with an accent that reveals the years he spent in Eastern Europe before his mother, taking the remains of the family silver, arrived in the United States. No red-diaper baby, Samuels describes his youth as "street-wise" and his ambition as making it in America. Like many others, however, "the whole thing burst into flame" when the Depression forced him to dropout of school and hunger marches, bonus marches, and unemployed council protests acted on his emerging social conscience. Soon he was moving toward the Party and engaging in union organizing. Samuels, a gruff, self-deprecating man who often refers to his "big mouth," rose to leadership within a small craft union and served on the city CIO council. His CIO union was dominated by a Popular Front coalition of the Party and a progressive Catholic group. The union president, a leader of the latter, was incompetent; on several occasions Samuels had to bail him out of collective-bargaining disasters. Finally the Catholic faction and the Party faction sought to replace the president with Samuels. The national Party leadership, however, afraid of upsetting the delicate coalition, said no. Samuels recalls that he "didn't even question" the decision, but he was frustrated and soon left the union to become an organizer for a larger, industrial union. Samuels agrees with Milt Goldberg that it was relatively easy to be a good organizer in that period. Labor was in an upswing, workers were clamoring to be organized, NLRB cards were easy to accumulate. In heavy industry, Samuels stresses, the key was to seek out the pockets of old radical workers—not colonizers, he emphasizes—who had broken down the old ethnic barriers. Many such organizers were members of the IWO foreign-language federations. Next, one needed the "pie-cards," the full-time organizers supplied by the CIO itself, many of whom were veteran radicals. Along with and sometimes among the pie-cards were the younger Communists going into the shops, supported by a growing and confident Party organization. A "highly developed structure," Samuels recalls, was essential to organizing success. One had to develop shop committees and day-to-day contacts in each department. The sense of strength provided by the union itself and, crucially, by its CIO sponsor, allowed workers to imagine that the employers could be successfully challenged. In the automobile, steel, rubber, mining, and electrical equipment industries, workers facedmammoth corporations willing to use any means necessary to throw back the unionist surge. The New Deal, by encouraging a more neutral judiciary and law enforcement role, made it easier for the coordinated CIO drives to gain concessions from corporate heads. Samuels suggests that the workers, some of whom had backed decades of unsuccessful rank-and-file efforts, needed the sense that they were a part of a powerful coalition. L. Lewis appealed to this sense when he proclaimed, "The President want you to join a union." Such a coalition advanced unionization at the same time that it necessitated concessions and strictures that limited the leverage of the newly legitimized unions.^16 Samuels argues that it was imperative for organizers to have knowledge of their industries. He deliberately worked in a craft shop to learn the trade and later carefully studied one heavy industry before going out to organize its workers. He was not typical. Hodee Edwards, a thirties organizer, stresses "our consistent failure to investigate the neighborhoods and factories where we tried to work, thus applying a generalized, sectarian plan usually incomprehensible to those we wanted to reach."^17 And Sam Katz suggests that the Party did not always recognize the tension between the leadership and the activist/organizer over the pace and nature of organizing. The functionaries often pushed for the most advanced positions, including the "resolutions bit," whereas the organizers focused on the issues that confronted their constituents. Conflict was inevitable between broad policy and local needs and variations, and between policy planners and functionaries and field organizers and the rank and file. It is clear that the Communist Party suffered chronically from top-heavy decision making, which often left local organizers and members with policy directives that made little sense in local circumstances. In addition to organizational strength and preparation, Samuels feels that leadership ability and, at times, personal courage must be demonstrated. On several occasions he had to take risks or lose the confidence of his membership. In one local the workers affectionately referred to him as "R.R.J.B.," Red Russian JewBastard. He tells of organizing workers in a small Georgia company town. Fifteen hundred were on strike, and the patriarchal owners were negotiating only under pressure from the NLRB. They were stalling, however, so Samuels called on the work force to increase the pressure by massing outside the building where the negotiations were taking place. The next day, in the midst of bargaining, Samuels noticed the face of the company's attorney turning an ash white as he glanced out the window. What he saw were about three hundred workers marching toward the building carrying a rope; lynching was on their agenda. Samuels went out and calmed them down, "modified" their demands, and then wrapped up negotiations. His early organizing days also included maritime struggles with gangster elements who were not beyond "bumping off" militants. Samuels implies that the Left elements fought back, sometimes resorting to their own brand of physical intimidation.^18 Peggy Dennis describes the Bolshevik ideal as "soldiers in a revolutionary army at permanent war with a powerful class enemy." And "in permanent war, doubts or questions are treason."^19 Yet as Joseph Starobin asks, "How could the Leninist equilibrium be sustained in a country so different from Lenin's?"^20 In fact, it was sustained unevenly and at a price. In a society with a tradition of civil liberties (albeit inconsistently applied and occasionally suspended in moments of stress) and a remarkably resilient political democracy, the Leninist model, hardened and distorted by Stalinism, mixed uncomfortably with American realities.^21 At its best the Leninist ideal encouraged the incredible levels of hard work and perseverance that even critics of Communism grant to its cadres; it also evoked such personal qualities as integrity, courage, honesty, and militancy. Yet the ideal seemed to degenerate too easily into a model of behavior appropriately labeled Stalinist. Communist cadres accepted deceptive tactics and strategies that inevitably backfired and undermined theirintegrity and reputations—for example, the front groups that "flip-flopped" at Party command after years of denying Party domination. The intolerance and viciousness with which Communists often attacked adversaries, including liberals, socialists, and their own heretics, remains inexcusable.^22 As organizers, Communist activists suffered from a tendency toward a special kind of elitism that often made them incapable of working with diverse groups sharing common goals. In some periods they turned this streak of inhumanity against themselves, engaging in ugly campaigns of smear and character assassination to eliminate "Titoists," "Browderites," "revisionists," "left-wing adventurists," or "white chauvinists." Moreover, the secrecy within which Communists often operated, while sometimes justified by the danger of job loss or prosecution, served to undermine the Party's moral legitimacy. An organizer's relationship with his constituents depends on their belief in his integrity, and this is especially true when the organizer is an outsider. Too often, Communists undermined their own integrity by covering manipulative and cynical acts with the quite plausible explanation that survival required secrecy. The tendency of Communists to resort to First and Fifth Amendment protection during the McCarthy period falls under similar challenges. As Joseph Starobin asks: Should left-wingers and Communists have gone to jail in large numbers? Might they have been better off/politically/, in terms of their/image/, to assert their affiliations, to proclaim them instead of asserting their right to keep them private, to explain the issues as they saw them, and to take the consequences?^23 Communist activists certainly did not lack courage or commitment to a protracted struggle. Many risked prison, and some served prison sentences; perhaps as many as one-third of the cadres painfully accepted assignments to go underground in the early fifties. Their Leninism had to navigate contradictory currents of Stalinism and Americanization, militancy and opportunism. Local Communist activists often lived a somewhat schizophrenic life, alternately internationalist and indigenous, Bolshevik and "progressive," admiring the Leninist model of cadre and yet falling into more settled, familial patterns of activism. There was a clear if often ignored sexual division of labor: men were more likely to be the cadres, women performed auxiliary clerical functions and unnoticed but essential neighborhood organizing. The Party was also divided between theorists and intellectuals on the one hand and field workers and activists on the other. As one field worker proclaimed, "I couldn't be spending hours on ideological conflicts; I'm an activist, not an intellectual." Many agree that the bulk of an organizer's time went into local actions and much less went into discussions and considerations of important theoretical or programmatic matters.^24 Only a small proportion received the type of ideological and intellectual training suggested by the Leninist ideal, an ideal that formally sought the obliteration of the distinctions between thought and action, intellectual and activist. In fact, Party intellectuals faced chronic and ingrained suspicion, even contempt, from Party leaders. Abe Shapiro sardonically charges that the function of Party intellectuals was "to sell the/Daily Worker/at the waterfront." He remembers checking on a new Party document on the economy: "I actually read the document. I wanted to know what the Hell it was." He found it infantile and far below what well-trained but never used Party intellectuals and social scientists could have produced. The Party rarely, except for showcase purposes, relied on its trained intellectual or academic members; instead, it called on Party functionaries, often of very narrow training, to write about complex sociological, economic, and scientific matters. Theory suffered as a result, and the Party, particularly after 1939, included very few intellectuals. Until the mid-fifties crisis, the Party, strangled by Stalinist dogma and intolerance, was closed to intellectual discourse. Abe Shapiro finally left the Party because his intellectual training hadgiven him a commitment to intellectual honesty that he could not shake. Among organizers, Party arrogance cut off messages from the grass roots. Orders from what one veteran calls "the Cave of Winds"—Party headquarters in New York—often contradicted practical organizing experience. The Party also suffered from insularity. Mark Greenly brought interested fellow workers to a Party-dominated union meeting. They were curious and "antiboss" but quite unsophisticated and not at all ready to make any commitments. Unfortunately, the Party organizer immediately started to discuss class struggle and a variety of abstract political matters. The workers were quickly alienated and frightened away, never to return. Ethel Paine recalls such "inappropriate behavior" as the sectarian conversations Party people would carry on in the presence of non-Communist acquaintances and neighbors. Although chronically secretive about membership, Communists could be remarkably insensitive to their audience in revealing ways. A successful organizer learned when and how to introduce more controversial ideas to nonmembers. Training, including the Party schools, helped to some extent, but most Communists agree with the veteran organizer who feels that such learning has to be done on the job, by trial and error. Many Communists, like Sam Katz and Caldwell, tell painful if sometimes hilarious tales of their own and others' ineptitude as beginning organizers. Some discovered that they simply were not suited for the job and would never develop the personal qualities that make for a competent organizer. Several veterans insist that organizers are born, not made. Yet relatively introverted and socially awkward young people, inspired by the idealism and the comradeship of the Communist movement, did transform themselves into effective organizers. Vivian Gornick points out that such transformations did not always survive the collapse of association with the Party.^25 I did not, however, discover total or near total personality changes caused either by joining or abandoning the Party. Although most of the literature about radical organizers deals with men, it is increasingly apparent that some of the mostsignificant and consistently ignored organizing within the Communist Party involved women. The ten women interviewed performed a rich variety of Party tasks, but perhaps the most important were those not officially designated, like the informal neighborhood activities organized by Edith Samuels, described inChapter Five . Sarah Levy was also involved in such efforts. Sarah and her two children joined her colonizer husband, Moe, in leaving the comfortable Party concentration in the Strawberry Mansion section to live in a nearby industrial town. She refers to the next three and a half years as "not the easiest times and, yet to me, personally, one of the best growing experiences—and I have never regretted it." (Moe's wry rejoinder was "She didn't have to work the blast furnaces.") There were only three Party families in the town, quite a difference from the thirty or forty Party friends they left behind in Strawberry Mansion. While Moe worked the furnaces and tried to develop contacts with plant workers, Sarah joined a folk dance group at the local "Y," where she got to know Greek, Yugoslav, Italian, and other immigrant women. Moe, limited in the plant to a small Party circle of colonizers and sympathizers, was able to socialize with the husbands of Sarah's folk dancing partners. Colonizers often ended up working with a local Party apparatus while their wives, working through neighborhood networks, reached into the community through its women, older people, and children. Asie Repice casually but proudly concluded about her work with a community center during the war years; "I am an organizer, so I organized a nursery." Her husband was in the service. Moving around to stay close to his base, she put her organizing abilities and political values to work. Such efforts remain an unwritten chapter in the history of radical organizing.^26 */functionaries/* Few district functionaries other than Sam Darcy achieved any national stature or had much leverage outside the district. Dave Davis, the business manager of UE Local 155 and an importantPhiladelphia-area labor leader, was often elected to the Party's national committee but never entered the inner decision-making group. Other district leaders—like Pat Toohey, Phil Bart, Phil Frankfeld, and Ed Strong—were D.O.s sent into the district and then moved out again to other assignments. Most district functionaries played dominant roles within the district committee and ran such important Party operations as the local Progressive Party and the Civil Rights Congress. They drew meager salaries, which were sometimes supplemented by Party-related employment. The Party network, at least during the late thirties and forties, could place members in some union jobs.^27 Possibly several dozen members depended on the Party for their livelihood in this way. */nonmembers/* One often encounters Communists who, for very specific reasons, were not formal Party members. One former Progressive Party leader never joined the Party but worked closely with district Communist leaders to map strategy and coordinate activity. Some union leaders stayed out of the Party to deny employers the red-baiting weapon, and a number dropped out after the Taft-Hartley Act made a union officer liable to prosecution for perjury if he lied about current Party membership.^28 */professionals/* Some professionals who joined the Party operated at a rank-and-file level, belonging to a professional branch or club, attending meetings, and fulfilling subscription quotas. Several recall being highly impressed with the other professionals they met at Party functions. But such members—often doctors, dentists, and architects—were on the margins of Party life. Many professionals, especially lawyers associated with Party causes, found membership problematic and chose not to formalize their relationships with the Party, though they might be members of a professional club. "I fought against loose tongues," one states."I never asked a soul whether they were Communists or not." Several left-wing attorneys stress that they did not want to be in a position to betray anyone or risk a perjury charge if questioned about their own affiliations and associations. The law in America is a conservative profession, and several Left lawyers paid a high price for their efforts.^29 Another consideration was that the Party sometimes pressured lawyers to use a particular legal strategy in Party-related cases, and such pressure was more effectively applied to members.^30 One attorney notes that the Party itself seemed ambivalent about requiring formal membership. A few district leaders pressured him to join, while others understood that it was not particularly useful or necessary. Some lawyers, whether members or not, found their services very much in demand. They were needed in labor negotiations, electoral activities, and civil rights and civil liberties cases. In the late forties and early fifties, Party-affiliated lawyers found it less easy than it had been to earn a living through Party-based clients, such as left-wing unions. Instead they were called upon to deal with the titanic task of defending Party members indicted under the Smith Act and other pieces of repressive legislation. Thanks to this demand, as one attorney suggests, they received special treatment from the district leadership. They mixed with labor leaders, politicians, judges, and, at times, the national Party leadership. Several had more contact with the non-Communist local authorities than district functionaries had. One left-wing attorney recalls that he had the luxury of criticizing Party policies and decisions, within limits, because "I was needed, I was special, a lawyer." More significant than membership was the degree of autonomy a member had, and this was based on his importance to the Party or his institutional leverage. A professional could get away with criticism of the Nazi-Soviet Pact that would not be tolerated from rank-and-filers or most cadres. A union leader could ignore Party instructions, aware that his own organization was his power base. A former Communist, George Charney, criticizes in his memoirsthe "left-wing aristocracy of labor that rarely mingled with the herd of party members or the middle functionaries."^31 Such trade-unions "influentials" often had contempt for functionaries and would go over their heads to top leadership. Those who entered the Party, at whatever level, in whatever role, operated within a well-defined organization and lived within a somewhat insular and often nurturing subculture that provided them with formal and informal relationships. These relationships eased the often lonely organizing work. One veteran unashamedly calls his fellow Communist organizers "the most dedicated, most selfless people in the struggle." Many would share Jessica Mitford's feelings: I had regarded joining the Party as one of the most important decisions of my adult life. I loved and admired the people in it, and was more than willing to accept the leadership of those far more experienced than I. Furthermore, the principle of democratic centralism seemed to me essential to the functioning of a revolutionary organization in a hostile world.^32 Any tendency to romanticize such activists must be tempered by an awareness of their mistakes, limitations, and weaknesses, and it is true that many non-Communists made similar commitments to organizing the oppressed and the weak. They too merit consideration. These Philadelphia veterans of the Communist Party are very human actors who worked on a particular historical stage. Some conclude that their years of effort never really brought any of their factory and shop constituents into the movement. Like Sol Davis, they admit that they were utter failures in that "cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland" of blue-collar America. Others share the pride, perhaps the arrogance, of one of Vivian Gornick's subjects: We're everywhere, everywhere. We/saved/this f--king country. We went to Spain, and because we did America understood fascism. We made Vietnam come to an end, we're in there inWatergate. We built the CIO, we got Roosevelt elected, we started black civil rights, we forced this sh-tty country into every piece of action and legislation it has ever taken. We did the dirty work and the Labor and Capital establishments got the rewards. The Party helped make democracy work.^33 The road from Spain to Watergate is a long one. Communists, euphoric at their prospects in the heyday of CIO sit-downs and Popular Front triumphs, later needed remarkable inner resources to sustain political activity. They sensed the first tremors from the purge trials, received a severe jolt from the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, and in the postwar years faced first political repression and then, more painfully, internal disintegration and demoralization. NEXT CHAPTER seven: problems and crises, 1939–1956 the founder of Black Lives Matter once described herself as a trained , like Obama, but I could only find this: https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ On 10/17/22 10:32 someone wrote:
Since many believe Obama is running the Marxist Biden administration We might want to look at a history of comnunist organizing, euphemistically called a community organizing https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/philadelphia-communists-1936-1956/section/c5cbd6e3-ed24-4bcb-97b0-da424fc58416 */the communist as organizer/* In the period between the Great Crash and the McCarthy era the CPUSA was the most effective organizing agency within the American experience.^1 In this most politically stable of societies, radicals have usually battered their heads against the stone wall of affluence, rising expectations, and Democratic Party loyalty. Within the narrow space of agitation allowed by the political order, Communist Party activists built a small but influential organization devoted to organizing constituencies for social change. According to even the most unsympathetic accounts, Communist activists played important roles in organizing the unemployed, evicted tenants, minorities, and workers in a wide variety of fields. They were central in the emergence of the CIO and thus in the organizing of workers in heavy industry and mass production; they spearheaded the defense of the right of black people to equality before the law and social and economic opportunity; and they participated in virtually all of the nationalefforts to establish humane social services and eliminate hunger, disease, and neglect from our communities.^2 Many analysts question the motives of Communist Party activists, and there certainly is controversy about the extent of their organizing successes. Nevertheless, Communist organizing merits serious and objective consideration. For a period of approximately thirty years, Communist Party activists and organizers sought out constituents in the mines, plants, and neighborhoods of the United States. Other left-wing groups, such as the Socialist Party, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party, and A. J. Muste's Workers Party, also deserve study, but the CPUSA offers students the best opportunity to examine the dynamics of organizing sponsored and directed by a radical political group.^3 The organizers under consideration came to political maturity during the 1930s, mostly in an era associated with the Popular Front, and remained within the Party until at least the mid-Fifties. Indeed, many remained active organizers and participants after leaving the organizational framework of the Communist Party. In the thirties and forties, they modified their Bolshevik rhetoric and participated in antifascist alliances, worked for modest short-term successes within the fledgling CIO, and provided support and manpower for a diverse group of radical and progressive political movements and leaders, including Democrats, Farmer-Laborites, the American Labor Party in New York, and Communist Party councilmen in New York City, all under an essentially New Deal banner.^4 Organizers operating in the greater Philadelphia district had important trade-union successes and played a key role in organizing unemployed councils, electoral efforts, tenant rights, and peace, professional lobbying, civil liberties, ethnically based, and neighborhood groups. For a period of approximately ten years, from 1936 to perhaps 1947, the Communist Party of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, District Three, played an important if modest role in the political life of the area, generating ideas, programs, and visions that later became the commonplaces of social policy. The Party offered its membership several roles. One could remain at the rank-and-file level, become a cadre, or rise to functionary. One could engage in mass work within one of the Party fronts or a non-Party organization (e.g., the YMCA) or one could become a "colonizer," engaging in industrial organizing at the beck and call of the Party. In addition, one could work within the professional section, providing the Party with such services as legal counsel.^5 */rank and file/* At the lowest level of Party membership were the rank and file, the proverbial "Jimmy Higginses" who worked within Party clubs and branches, paid their dues, went to a variety of meetings, and joined the mass organizations and fronts, often focusing on a specific issue like Spain, civil rights, or Scottsboro. Such rank-and-filers were at the heart of everyday activities and what Gornick calls "grinding ordinariness."^6 There was an extraordinary turnover among such members, who often became weary of meetings,/Daily Worker/solicitations, and office chores. Many rank-and-filers began their activism while in college or sometimes high school. The Philadelphia high school movement was quite sizable, including ASU and YCL chapters in at least eight schools. High school activists ranged throughout the city, meeting radical peers, socializing, and developing their own circle of comrades. For those who entered college either already active or about to be radicalized, there was an almost dizzying flow of activities, including demonstrations, marches, sit-downs, leaflettings, fundraisers, dances, parties, socials, lectures, speeches—and meetings. Always, there were meetings, one for every night of the week, often more.^7 Enthusiastic, recently converted Communists, like their spiritual children in the 1960s, had unbounded energy for political work. Most speak of being aroused and inspired by their sense of the significance of their efforts, the quality of their comrades, and the grandeur and power of their movement. Abe Shapiro recalls being engrossed at one time in the following activities: formal YCL meetings, ASU leadership, a universityantiwar council (of which he was director), Spanish civil war relief efforts, a variety of antifascist activities, a student-run bookstore cooperative, and support work for assorted civil liberties and civil rights causes. Some activists found schoolwork boring under the circumstances and devoted all of their time to politics. A few became "colonizers." In most cases, however, Communist students completed their degree work, and if they dropped out of school, it was often for financial reasons. For most, the excitement of campus politics held their attention and their interest. Some found Party youth work a path toward leadership, becoming citywide or national ASU or YCL leaders. Others on leaving campus became YCL branch or section organizers in different parts of the district. Many who did not attend college did neighborhood work with the YCL, often focusing their mass organizational efforts through the American League for Peace and Democracy. To many youthful rank-and-filers, "the YCL became . . . Marxist-Leninist theory all mixed up with baseball, screwing, dancing, selling the/Daily Worker/, bullsh-tting, and living the American-Jewish street life."^8 Certainly the first flush of radicalism, the emotional high of purposeful activity, the sense of accomplishment and of sacrifice for the good of humanity, the work with fine and noble comrades, the love affairs with those sharing a common vision, the expectation that the future was indeed theirs, created a honeymoon effect for most young Communists. For some, the fad of radicalism passed upon graduation or thereabouts. Others simply maintained a regular but distant "fellow-traveling" role as they entered the work world. And many were disillusioned by the Party's dogmatism or the great purge trials, the attacks on Trotsky, or the Non-Aggression Pact of 1939. Others, including those interviewed, remained in the Party. The shortest stay was six years, and most remained loyal for twenty years or more. For all of those who stayed, the Party and its small subculture became their lives. Those working at the branch, club, and section levels were rarely on the Party payroll and had to find work to supportthemselves. For single people problems were few and life could be lived at a double-time pace, working hard all day and then organizing and holding meetings every night. Some young Communists drifted for a time after school, doing Party work but not settling into anything. Ben Green lived in Strawberry Mansion, a lower-middle- and working-class Jewish neighborhood filled with Party people at the time. He did some work with the American League Against War and Fascism, spoke on street corners occasionally, went to three to four meetings a week, and helped to start a union local of public employees at his Works Progress Administration (WPA) office. He remembers that the Party "made it a big thing" when he shifted from the YCL to adult membership, but he was still looking at his future with uncertainty. Upon completing high school, George Paine felt that "sports were gone" from his life except for an occasional neighborhood basketball game. He kept in touch but saw less of old non-Party buddies and did standard political work, "hustling the paper," going to meetings, demonstrating. Finally he decided to go to college, suspending but not ending his Party ties. One rank-and-filer was a skilled craftsman, "glad of the class I was born into." He belonged to a conservative craft union and limited his political work to mass work at the local YMCA. He never really got involved with a club or branch group but paid his dues, subscribed to the paper, and worked with comrades to move the "Y" in a more "progressive" direction. He was quite open about his views, which would eventually get him into trouble at his job: "I felt that since to me everything was so clear, they'd hug me." Tim Palen, a farmer and skilled craftsman who lived in a rural suburb of Philadelphia, worked with the Farmers Union. A Party rank-and-filer, he helped farmers get low-interest loans through the union and sympathetic banks. Palen never involved himself with Party affairs in the city, and the highest office he held was dues secretary of his section. Since the Communist Party did not formally label members according to their rank, it is not always clear who was a rank-and-filer and who was considered cadre. One former district leader defines cadres as the people in training for leadership, like officers in an army. The rank and file are, therefore, foot soldiers, less involved and more a part of their own neighborhood or plant, more likely to hold conventional jobs, and more subject to pressures from neighbors, family, and changing circumstances. Annie Kriegel, who analyzes the French Communist Party as a set of concentric circles, places fellow travelers who vote for the Party and read the Sunday Party press on the "outer circle" and "ordinary party members" in the "first circle."^9 Many observers describe such rank-and-filers as less "Bolshevik"—that is, more likely to break Party discipline in everyday activity and closer to the behavior and sensibilities of their non-Party peers. Harvey Klehr puts it, "Many party members received no training of any kind, attendance at party meetings was often spotty, and members frequently ignored or failed to carry out assigned tasks."^10 Almond presents esoteric and exoteric models to distinguish rank-and-filer from cadre, suggesting that the Party daily press directed itself to the relatively idealistic and naive external members, while the Comintern, Cominform, and internal Party journals spoke to insiders and sophisticated activists.^11 */cadre/* The cadre has a "personal commitment." He or she is a "true Bolshevik," internally Communized, with an almost priestly function and sense of specialness. The cadre is a "professional revolutionary" along Leninist lines.^12 Philip Selznick adds that cadres are "deployable personnel," available to the Party at all times.^13 Some observers use "cadre" interchangeably with "functionary," while others distinguish them. I interpret "functionary" as a more administrative and executive role, usually carrying more authority and generally associated with top district and national leadership.^14 Cadres were field workers, organizers, sometimes on the payroll but often holding a non-Party job. Some more mobile cadres lefttheir own neighborhoods, but most worked at least within their home districts. (Functionaries, on the other hand, could be homegrown and district-bound or at the service of the national, even international, office.) Many studies exaggerate the distinction between inner core and outer rings because of their dependence on the abstractions of Party tracts. Almond, for example, claims that the "true Communist" was beyond any commitment to the Popular Front since he was presumably fully Bolshevized and aware of the duplicity and tactical nature of moderated rhetoric. Perhaps this is true of the national leadership, who had associations with Moscow, training at the Lenin School, and Comintern experience. At the district level, however, the patterns are not as clear and seem to be more sensitive to generational, class, and ethnic variables.^15 Among informants, the word "cadre" connoted "hard-working," "brave," "dogged," and "honorable"—someone who followed a Leninist model of behavior; "functionary," on the other hand, was often used negatively to imply that someone was "bureaucratic," "aloof," "abstract," and "remote from struggle"—in brief, the Stalinist/apparatchik/. Neither necessarily belonged to an inner core. Fred Garst tells of the "process of indoctrination" he underwent as he entered into Party life, beginning with "the regularity of systematic participation"—dues, meetings, selling Party literature. He says that the number of meetings began slowly to escalate to three, sometimes five a week: section and subsection meetings, executive meetings, front meetings. Next, Garst was asked to lead a discussion, then to take responsibility for organizing the distribution of literature. He started taking classes at a local Workers School in Marxist theory and labor history. His commitment grew, his experience deepened, and he soon became a section leader. Some Philadelphia Communists moved from rank-and-file to cadre roles during important political campaigns like theProgressive Party efforts of 1947–1948. One woman had been serving in a minor capacity—"not anything earth-shattering"—but was swept up by what Wallace referred to as "Gideon's Army." She became a full-time Progressive Party organizer at a district level, her "first real organizing"; from that point on, she was fully involved in Party work at a variety of levels. Some cadres emphasized front and mass work, serving as leaders of IWO ethnic groups, youth groups, and defense groups. Such cadres were particularly likely to operate clandestinely, although many communicated their affilitation all but formally to constituents. Cadres can be distinguished by their level of operation (club, branch, section, or district), by their funding (on the payroll or holding a regular job), by their relative mobility and willingness to do political work outside their own milieu, and, finally, by the type of organizing they did (mass or front work, electoral party work, industrial organizing). The most prestigious cadres were those who did full-time industrial organizing at the will of the Party leadership. Such organizers, whether of working-class origins or not and whether indigenous or colonizers, were the heart of Party operations, seeking to develop a proletarian constituency and a trade-union base. /ny tisa/ ny Tisa's history shows what an experienced organizer could accomplish. Tisa, a second-generation son of illiterate, working-class peasants, went to work at the Campbell's Soup plant in his own South Camden "Little Italy" after completing high school in the early 1930s. While working summers at the plant, he had been stimulated by street-corner radical speakers and had joined the Socialist Party, which had a presence at Campbell's Soup. The Socialists sent him to Brookwood Labor College, where he met young Communists who impressed him with their earnestness and apparent lack of factionalism, a problem he encountered among the Socialists. He returned to help organize the plant, starting with a small group of about a half-dozen Italian workers, none of themCommunists, whom he molded through a discussion group. His group received a federal charter from the American Federation of Labor and began to develop an underground, dues-paying membership. Tisa tells of frustrating experiences within the conservative AFL. At the 1939 convention in Tampa, for example, he found himself accidently strolling into a local walk-out of Del Monte workers, just as the police were arresting the leader. He spoke to thery workers and was himself threatened with arrest. The workers exclaimed, "You got Bo [the arrested leader] but you're not gonna get him," and made a ring to escort Tisa to a streetcar. That evening, at his suggestion, there was a union meeting, packed and excited. When Tisa tried to speak about this remarkable experience at the AFL convention, he was refused the floor. Finally he simply took over the podium and microphone. Later that day, he met with other militants, including Communists, to organize the ClO-affiliated Food, Tobacco and Agricultural Workers Union. He took a detour, however, as events in Spain captured his energies and idealism. Tisa served two years in Spain with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, gaining "a sense of internationalism that never escapes you." On his return, he immediately set out to organize Campbell's Soup. At the time Tisa began to organize it, Campbell's Soup employed about 5,500 full-time workers, with another 5,000 part-timers who came in during the heavy season. At least half the workers were of Italian descent; there were few blacks until the late 1940s. About half the work force was female. There was a sexual division of labor based on physical strength. Tisa's organizing group consisted of eleven or twelve key workers, all leftists, mostly Italian. None were "colonizers." All were indigenous workers who, under Tisa's leadership, planned the unionization of Campbell's. Tisa recalls that the group would often go crabbing and then return to his home to eat, drink, and talk strategy. Tisa was the only member of the group on the national union's payroll; he made a bare ten or fifteen dollars a week. The organizers distributed themselves through the plant, reaching out to obvious sympathizers and picking up useful information that they would relay to Tisa, who could not enter the plant. He would take names and visit workers in their homes, signing them up so that the union could hold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election. He would also cull information about working conditions from his organizers and publish it in a union bulletin that they distributed clandestinely, each carrying five to ten copies. As their numbers increased, they became bolder and distributed the much discussed bulletin openly. Campbell's Soup had Tisa arrested once, but when he was released, many workers came to greet him. He assured them that the law permitted them to organize a union. The company tried many tactics to block his efforts: they started a company union; they charged that he was a "Red" and had raped nuns and killed priests in Spain. But Tisa lived in an Italian neighborhood among plant workers and had a mother who had worked in the plant for many years (cheering his speeches, often at the wrong times, he wryly and lovingly notes); he could not be red-baited easily. He was an open Communist; his neighbors would say, "ny's a Communist, but he's all right." Despite the real barrier of the workers'traditional Catholicism, he produced traditional trade-union benefits for members and was popular enough locally, a neighbor, to remain in leadership until the CIO purges of the late forties and early fifties finally forced him out. Tisa's experience highlights the importance of developing indigenous personnel in organizing activity. His efforts were certainly bolstered by support from the national union, by Communist Party training and aid, and by the relative benevolence of the federal government as expressed through the new NLRB. Yet the presence of local activists, something the Communist Party sought but did not often achieve, invariably made the task of organizing a plant or neighborhood that much easier. Other organizers performed similar roles without formally entering the Party, preferring to remain independent although generally taking positions consistent with Party policy. /jack ryan/ Jack Ryan's old man was "a union man," later a foreman, a local Democratic politician, and a bootlegger. As a teen-ager, and a high school drop-out, Ryan ran poker and crap games in the neighborhood with a group of friends, some of whom wound up in prison. He worked sporadically as a roofer, during which time he was influenced by a socialist "who couldn't read or write until he was twenty-three." His father finally got him a job at a local plant, where he worked as a crane operator in the early Depression years until he was laid off in 1931. Over the next two years, he tried a small store and "managed to hang on," selling water ice and running crap games. In 1933 he went back to the plant just at the point when the local union was being formed. Ryan recalls that he was "sworn in in an elevator with the lights out in between the floors." Despite his emerging radical politics, Ryan remained on the margins at first. "I deliberately didn't get active," he says, indicating that life seemed too unpredictable to take chances. In fact, he entered into a real-estate business on the side, and it eventually provided him with the cushion that allowed him to become more active within the plant. Initially he ran for the general committee, backed by the other crane operators because of his successful grievance work. Still cautious ("I kept my mouth shut," he notes), Ryan went along with the conservative local leadership while maintaining contact with the plant militants, several of whom were old Wobblies suspicious of any Communist Party leadership. Ryan worked primarily through his own crane operators' network within the plant. He played the trade-offs in union posts among the plant's crafts to become local president, an unpaid post, and finally business representative, the only salaried position within the local. Ryanremained close to the Party but never joined. "I was more radical than they were," he brags. He criticizes their twists and turns and suggests that "in the end you can't trust any of them" because of "the goddamn line." He adds that the/Daily Worker/was "written for a bunch of morons." On the other hand, Ryan admits that Party union members were often competent and successful organizers and that he agreed with most of their Popular Front stances, particularly their antifascism. On the Soviets, he says that he did not spend too much time thinking about them, but adds, "I don't blame them for having a treaty with the Germans." Ryan is clearly concerned with the practical issues of trade unionism. In describing one of his national officers, he exclaims, "A dedicated Communist but a helluva guy." He praises L. Lewis's efforts at industrial unionization: "him and the Commies put together the CIO; they were the smartest crowd." So Jack Ryan worked with but kept some distance from "the Commies": "they were a little bit nutty." His union was one of those expelled from the CIO in the late forties, and he remains bitter about the Party's role in the union's decline. He remained active, holding union office on and off until his retirement. Ryan proudly concludes that he was placed on Social Security while on strike for the last time in the early seventies. ny Tisa and Jack Ryan were working-class organizers, with roots in their ethnic communities, able to establish a rapport with their peers and, at the same time, develop more sophisticated skills within a broader and more ideological movement in or around the Communist Party. Their failures were mostly exogenous, the results of Taft-Hartley oaths, CIO purges, and McCarthyism in general. Others operated in less favorable terrain, without the decided advantages of an indigenous, working-class background. The most characteristic Party labor organizer was a young, educated, second-generation Jewish-American sent to "dig roots into the working-class." The efforts of such organizers were prodigious; their accomplishments, however, were more problematic. /al schwartz/ Al Schwartz's father was a 1905er, a Party organizer in the garment industry who had to open a small shop after he was blacklisted. Al, a classic "red-diaper baby," went through all of the Party developmental steps, from Young Pioneers through YCL to full Party involvement. Most of all he wanted to be a radical journalist. For a few years he was able to work on the Pennsylvania supplement to the/Worker/, but when it folded, his journalism career seemed over. Over the next half-dozen years, Schwartz, now in his late twenties, went into the shops as a "colonizer." He remembers the sense of adventure and mission he felt working at a few of the larger heavy industrial plants in the area. Yet he also speaks of his sense of loss and defeat in having to aban hopes of writing. Schwartz's response to colonizing was painfully ambivalent: a college graduate and a Jew, born and bred within the Yiddish-Left subculture, he both relished the contact with blue-collar workers and remained distant from them. They were not like him, he stresses; they were mired in back-breaking labor, poor educations, and plebian forms of leisure. For a time he enjoyed the camaraderie of the local taverns, but ultimately he was an outsider, a Jewish family man and a struggling intellectual. Schwartz most fondly recalls the hardness and fitness of his body, the feeling that he was young and strong and physically a worker. But the successes were few, and later the McCarthy period made such Party efforts even more marginal. Schwartz found himself a family man in his mid-thirties without a career or a profession; frustrated and drifting out of Party life without drama or flourish, he moved to reorganize his life. His political values held, but his colonizing days were over. /sol davis/ Sol Davis grew up in a poor, working-class, immigrant household. He was a bright young boy, and like many other upwardly aspiring Jewish males, he flourished at the elite Central High School andbegan moving toward a professional career. At this point, in the early years of the Depression, he was swept off his feet, as he puts it, by the Communist Party. After completing his schooling, he worked lackadaisically at his profession while seeking an opportunity to go into the shops as a Communist Party organizer; he was "determined to be shop worker." His first attempts allowed him to learn something about machinery, although in each instance he was fired for his inexperience and incompetence. Finally he caught on. "I was in my element," he asserts, describing the war years in heavy industry. For Davis, the good organizer had to have a commitment to "the principles of Communism," "a talent for leadership," and a willingness to listen. A confident speaker, whose words are clipped and terse, he worked twenty-nine years in the shops, twenty-six of them at one plant. Located within the city, the plant was staffed mostly by Catholic workers (Polish or Irish), initially few blacks, and even fewer Jews. Davis's recollections are filled with bitter refrains about red-baiting and "turn-coat ex-CPers," sell-outs and "social democrats." He is proud of his successes, which include chairing the grievance committee and serving as shop steward during most of his union years. Davis presents his life as devoted to organizing in the shops; he never got involved in his neighborhood and tended to leave Party electoral work to others. A hard-line orthodox Communist still, Davis argues that those who abandoned the Party were "petty-bourgeois with petty-bourgeois ideas," whereas he "was nursed out of the trade-union movement." In the fifties, he admits, "life became unpleasant," both in his largely Jewish lower-middle-class neighborhood and in the shop, where "a certain resistance developed to my activity" among people he calls anti-Communist socialists. Davis believes that most American workers have been bought off in "discrete and discernible fashion" by imperialist profits, manipulated by the mass media, and blinded by nationalism, religion, and racism. After spending almost thirty years in theindustrial heartland, Davis remains "dedicated to an idea," an "unquestioned belief" in communism. Yet when asked about his ability to convert workers to class consciousness, a saddened Sol Davis replies, "Never—the shop was a desert for me." He did not convert a single worker and was "in that respect an utter failure." The shops, to the stoical Davis, were "a cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland despite having made so many friends." Sol Davis has kept the faith since he was "baptized" in the movement; his singular lack of organizing success rests, in his mind, on factors beyond his control—repression, cowardice, self-interest. He is a confident man. / caldwell/ Other colonizers had more mixed results. Caldwell, a college graduate with a middle-class WASP heritage, recalls that in his initial colonizing effort, "I wasn't very smart and made a lot of stupid mistakes—talked to people, became known as a troublemaker." He was fired. Fortunately for Caldwell, his firing made him a "celebrated case," and the predominantly Irish and Italian Catholic workers, and even the conservative union officials, rallied to his support. Caldwell says that whereas other Party organizers had their best contact in their own departments, he touched bases throughout the plant and often socialized at the local bar to maintain and develop relationships. "A fair number knew I was a Communist," he says. "I never denied it." But most did not. In most plants to admit membership in the Party meant probable firing and certain harassment. For organizers like Caldwell, discretion was the rule. His efforts paid off against the union's local establishment. The national, a left-wing union, sent in an organizer to help fashion a local coalition to defeat the established group, and Caldwell worked with him as elections chairman. The progressive slate was successful. Caldwell, a leader of a left-wing veterans' group, participated in the 1946 strike surge. When mounted police chased people ontoporches in Southwest Philadelphia to break up injunction-defying demonstrations, the local CIO was able to bring out 25,000 workers to protest against police brutality in front of City Hall. But such Popular Front-style unified efforts were shattered by the developing Cold War consensus, which began to drive radicals, particularly Party members, out of the unions. Caldwell shifted jobs in this period, finally taking a full-time organizing job in a nearby industrial town. The plant had some IWO members and a few Party members, but no organization. Caldwell, who observes that "it really became difficult after the Korean War" started, found some success in putting out a small paper and handing it out at the main gates. He worked to develop contacts mainly by distributing the Party paper, first for free, then by subscription. Caldwell remembers proudly that he won a district drive with eighty subscriptions in his area. Gains were modest: a Hungarian sympathizer sent him two black shop stewards; then a few Irish Catholics made contact. Caldwell recalls going into Philadelphia to see prize fights with the latter workers, mixing pleasure with discussions of possible articles about their area for the Party press. But the times wrecked any chance Caldwell had of developing a Party group. The FBI scared off possible sympathizers; he was arrested for circulating antiwar petitions, and the venture finally ended in the heyday of the McCarthy period when Caldwell was sent to join the Party's underground. Caldwell and Al Schwartz experienced the ebb of the progressive union movement in the late forties and early fifties. Most Party labor organizers and colonizers, however, joined the fray during the extraordinary upsurge of the late thirties that established industrial unionism through the CIO. /milt goldberg/ Milt Goldberg, despite winning a Mayor's Scholarship, was unable to continue his education after graduating from Central High School. Instead, he scratched to make a living at odd jobs, gradually becoming interested in radical politics. While he wasworking a pre-Christmas job at Sears, the department store warehousemen went out on strike. Clerks refused to cross the picket lines. Goldberg recalls that the increasingly anxious owners persuaded the clerks to return to work with promises of improved conditions and wage increases that were never fulfilled; meanwhile, the warehousemen settled. In the aftermath, the strike leaders were all fired. Goldberg says that many of them were Communists and that he began to notice how often that was the case: "I respected the Party people; they were able, talented people." Goldberg became an organizer for a white-collar union dominated by mobsters who made deals with management at the expense of the membership. He describes his early efforts as "naive, inexperienced." Goldberg played a key role in leading his membership out of the corrupt union into a new CIO local, whose Philadelphia office staff was dominated by Party organizers. In those days, the late thirties, the era of sit-downs and a crescendo of collective bargaining agreements, organizing was remarkably fluid. Goldberg says that charters were granted easily and with little need for substantiation or the apparatus of negotiation soon to appear under the NLRB. In those days, he asserts with some nostalgia, one could go in and organize a place in one or two days, present demands to the employer, and make a deal. Such rapid victories were, of course, exceptions; Goldberg also recalls the often brutal resistance of management, particularly in heavy industry. After serving in the war, Goldberg returned to his union efforts, despite family advice that he try something more prestigious and lucrative. The union was his life, so he stayed. He never formally rejoined the Party, although he remained in close contact. The Taft-Harley anti-Communist oath soon reinforced this decision. Nevertheless, Goldberg and his small union were red-baited and constantly under McCarthyite attack. How did he survive? Goldberg argues that he "was very close to the membership" and had solid support from his fellow leaders. He emphasizes that the union provided real benefits and servicesto membership and sustained their loyalty despite the attacks. In addition, he notes that by this time the small union did not have a Party group, only him. One of the more damaging policies of Party-dominated unions was what Goldberg calls "the resolution bit"—the passing of Party-sponsored resolutions on every issue from Scottsboro to Spain. Too many left-wing unions manipulated such resolutions without making any effort to educate the membership; all that mattered was that local such-and-such of the so-and-so workers sent a resolution attacking Franco's dictatorship in Spain. Goldberg dropped such tactics in the postwar period, instead working with his local's officers and servicing the practical needs of the membership. By the mid-fifties, still a socialist, Milt Goldberg had become estranged from the Communist Party. As is true of most arts, the qualities that make for a successful organizer are uncertain and descriptions are inevitably cliche-ridden. As the experiences of ny Tisa and Jack Ryan indicate, having roots in the work force being organized gives one a decided advantage. But the Party could use only the troops it had available, and these were for the most part educated, urban, Jewish Americans, most of whom had no experience in the heavy industries that were their "colonies." Most of them experienced frustration; one cadre estimates that 95 percent of all Party colonizers failed. Too often colonizers were unable to operate in a sea of Gentile proletarians. Fred Garst, stillry at the Party for its insensitivity to context, charges that "the Left didn't have any organizing skills." But some organizers, remarkably, succeeded. /ike samuels/ Ike Samuels still speaks with an accent that reveals the years he spent in Eastern Europe before his mother, taking the remains of the family silver, arrived in the United States. No red-diaper baby, Samuels describes his youth as "street-wise" and his ambition as making it in America. Like many others, however, "the whole thing burst into flame" when the Depression forced him to dropout of school and hunger marches, bonus marches, and unemployed council protests acted on his emerging social conscience. Soon he was moving toward the Party and engaging in union organizing. Samuels, a gruff, self-deprecating man who often refers to his "big mouth," rose to leadership within a small craft union and served on the city CIO council. His CIO union was dominated by a Popular Front coalition of the Party and a progressive Catholic group. The union president, a leader of the latter, was incompetent; on several occasions Samuels had to bail him out of collective-bargaining disasters. Finally the Catholic faction and the Party faction sought to replace the president with Samuels. The national Party leadership, however, afraid of upsetting the delicate coalition, said no. Samuels recalls that he "didn't even question" the decision, but he was frustrated and soon left the union to become an organizer for a larger, industrial union. Samuels agrees with Milt Goldberg that it was relatively easy to be a good organizer in that period. Labor was in an upswing, workers were clamoring to be organized, NLRB cards were easy to accumulate. In heavy industry, Samuels stresses, the key was to seek out the pockets of old radical workers—not colonizers, he emphasizes—who had broken down the old ethnic barriers. Many such organizers were members of the IWO foreign-language federations. Next, one needed the "pie-cards," the full-time organizers supplied by the CIO itself, many of whom were veteran radicals. Along with and sometimes among the pie-cards were the younger Communists going into the shops, supported by a growing and confident Party organization. A "highly developed structure," Samuels recalls, was essential to organizing success. One had to develop shop committees and day-to-day contacts in each department. The sense of strength provided by the union itself and, crucially, by its CIO sponsor, allowed workers to imagine that the employers could be successfully challenged. In the automobile, steel, rubber, mining, and electrical equipment industries, workers facedmammoth corporations willing to use any means necessary to throw back the unionist surge. The New Deal, by encouraging a more neutral judiciary and law enforcement role, made it easier for the coordinated CIO drives to gain concessions from corporate heads. Samuels suggests that the workers, some of whom had backed decades of unsuccessful rank-and-file efforts, needed the sense that they were a part of a powerful coalition. L. Lewis appealed to this sense when he proclaimed, "The President want you to join a union." Such a coalition advanced unionization at the same time that it necessitated concessions and strictures that limited the leverage of the newly legitimized unions.^16 Samuels argues that it was imperative for organizers to have knowledge of their industries. He deliberately worked in a craft shop to learn the trade and later carefully studied one heavy industry before going out to organize its workers. He was not typical. Hodee Edwards, a thirties organizer, stresses "our consistent failure to investigate the neighborhoods and factories where we tried to work, thus applying a generalized, sectarian plan usually incomprehensible to those we wanted to reach."^17 And Sam Katz suggests that the Party did not always recognize the tension between the leadership and the activist/organizer over the pace and nature of organizing. The functionaries often pushed for the most advanced positions, including the "resolutions bit," whereas the organizers focused on the issues that confronted their constituents. Conflict was inevitable between broad policy and local needs and variations, and between policy planners and functionaries and field organizers and the rank and file. It is clear that the Communist Party suffered chronically from top-heavy decision making, which often left local organizers and members with policy directives that made little sense in local circumstances. In addition to organizational strength and preparation, Samuels feels that leadership ability and, at times, personal courage must be demonstrated. On several occasions he had to take risks or lose the confidence of his membership. In one local the workers affectionately referred to him as "R.R.J.B.," Red Russian JewBastard. He tells of organizing workers in a small Georgia company town. Fifteen hundred were on strike, and the patriarchal owners were negotiating only under pressure from the NLRB. They were stalling, however, so Samuels called on the work force to increase the pressure by massing outside the building where the negotiations were taking place. The next day, in the midst of bargaining, Samuels noticed the face of the company's attorney turning an ash white as he glanced out the window. What he saw were about three hundred workers marching toward the building carrying a rope; lynching was on their agenda. Samuels went out and calmed them down, "modified" their demands, and then wrapped up negotiations. His early organizing days also included maritime struggles with gangster elements who were not beyond "bumping off" militants. Samuels implies that the Left elements fought back, sometimes resorting to their own brand of physical intimidation.^18 Peggy Dennis describes the Bolshevik ideal as "soldiers in a revolutionary army at permanent war with a powerful class enemy." And "in permanent war, doubts or questions are treason."^19 Yet as Joseph Starobin asks, "How could the Leninist equilibrium be sustained in a country so different from Lenin's?"^20 In fact, it was sustained unevenly and at a price. In a society with a tradition of civil liberties (albeit inconsistently applied and occasionally suspended in moments of stress) and a remarkably resilient political democracy, the Leninist model, hardened and distorted by Stalinism, mixed uncomfortably with American realities.^21 At its best the Leninist ideal encouraged the incredible levels of hard work and perseverance that even critics of Communism grant to its cadres; it also evoked such personal qualities as integrity, courage, honesty, and militancy. Yet the ideal seemed to degenerate too easily into a model of behavior appropriately labeled Stalinist. Communist cadres accepted deceptive tactics and strategies that inevitably backfired and undermined theirintegrity and reputations—for example, the front groups that "flip-flopped" at Party command after years of denying Party domination. The intolerance and viciousness with which Communists often attacked adversaries, including liberals, socialists, and their own heretics, remains inexcusable.^22 As organizers, Communist activists suffered from a tendency toward a special kind of elitism that often made them incapable of working with diverse groups sharing common goals. In some periods they turned this streak of inhumanity against themselves, engaging in ugly campaigns of smear and character assassination to eliminate "Titoists," "Browderites," "revisionists," "left-wing adventurists," or "white chauvinists." Moreover, the secrecy within which Communists often operated, while sometimes justified by the danger of job loss or prosecution, served to undermine the Party's moral legitimacy. An organizer's relationship with his constituents depends on their belief in his integrity, and this is especially true when the organizer is an outsider. Too often, Communists undermined their own integrity by covering manipulative and cynical acts with the quite plausible explanation that survival required secrecy. The tendency of Communists to resort to First and Fifth Amendment protection during the McCarthy period falls under similar challenges. As Joseph Starobin asks: Should left-wingers and Communists have gone to jail in large numbers? Might they have been better off/politically/, in terms of their/image/, to assert their affiliations, to proclaim them instead of asserting their right to keep them private, to explain the issues as they saw them, and to take the consequences?^23 Communist activists certainly did not lack courage or commitment to a protracted struggle. Many risked prison, and some served prison sentences; perhaps as many as one-third of the cadres painfully accepted assignments to go underground in the early fifties. Their Leninism had to navigate contradictory currents of Stalinism and Americanization, militancy and opportunism. Local Communist activists often lived a somewhat schizophrenic life, alternately internationalist and indigenous, Bolshevik and "progressive," admiring the Leninist model of cadre and yet falling into more settled, familial patterns of activism. There was a clear if often ignored sexual division of labor: men were more likely to be the cadres, women performed auxiliary clerical functions and unnoticed but essential neighborhood organizing. The Party was also divided between theorists and intellectuals on the one hand and field workers and activists on the other. As one field worker proclaimed, "I couldn't be spending hours on ideological conflicts; I'm an activist, not an intellectual." Many agree that the bulk of an organizer's time went into local actions and much less went into discussions and considerations of important theoretical or programmatic matters.^24 Only a small proportion received the type of ideological and intellectual training suggested by the Leninist ideal, an ideal that formally sought the obliteration of the distinctions between thought and action, intellectual and activist. In fact, Party intellectuals faced chronic and ingrained suspicion, even contempt, from Party leaders. Abe Shapiro sardonically charges that the function of Party intellectuals was "to sell the/Daily Worker/at the waterfront." He remembers checking on a new Party document on the economy: "I actually read the document. I wanted to know what the Hell it was." He found it infantile and far below what well-trained but never used Party intellectuals and social scientists could have produced. The Party rarely, except for showcase purposes, relied on its trained intellectual or academic members; instead, it called on Party functionaries, often of very narrow training, to write about complex sociological, economic, and scientific matters. Theory suffered as a result, and the Party, particularly after 1939, included very few intellectuals. Until the mid-fifties crisis, the Party, strangled by Stalinist dogma and intolerance, was closed to intellectual discourse. Abe Shapiro finally left the Party because his intellectual training hadgiven him a commitment to intellectual honesty that he could not shake. Among organizers, Party arrogance cut off messages from the grass roots. Orders from what one veteran calls "the Cave of Winds"—Party headquarters in New York—often contradicted practical organizing experience. The Party also suffered from insularity. Mark Greenly brought interested fellow workers to a Party-dominated union meeting. They were curious and "antiboss" but quite unsophisticated and not at all ready to make any commitments. Unfortunately, the Party organizer immediately started to discuss class struggle and a variety of abstract political matters. The workers were quickly alienated and frightened away, never to return. Ethel Paine recalls such "inappropriate behavior" as the sectarian conversations Party people would carry on in the presence of non-Communist acquaintances and neighbors. Although chronically secretive about membership, Communists could be remarkably insensitive to their audience in revealing ways. A successful organizer learned when and how to introduce more controversial ideas to nonmembers. Training, including the Party schools, helped to some extent, but most Communists agree with the veteran organizer who feels that such learning has to be done on the job, by trial and error. Many Communists, like Sam Katz and Caldwell, tell painful if sometimes hilarious tales of their own and others' ineptitude as beginning organizers. Some discovered that they simply were not suited for the job and would never develop the personal qualities that make for a competent organizer. Several veterans insist that organizers are born, not made. Yet relatively introverted and socially awkward young people, inspired by the idealism and the comradeship of the Communist movement, did transform themselves into effective organizers. Vivian Gornick points out that such transformations did not always survive the collapse of association with the Party.^25 I did not, however, discover total or near total personality changes caused either by joining or abandoning the Party. Although most of the literature about radical organizers deals with men, it is increasingly apparent that some of the mostsignificant and consistently ignored organizing within the Communist Party involved women. The ten women interviewed performed a rich variety of Party tasks, but perhaps the most important were those not officially designated, like the informal neighborhood activities organized by Edith Samuels, described inChapter Five . Sarah Levy was also involved in such efforts. Sarah and her two children joined her colonizer husband, Moe, in leaving the comfortable Party concentration in the Strawberry Mansion section to live in a nearby industrial town. She refers to the next three and a half years as "not the easiest times and, yet to me, personally, one of the best growing experiences—and I have never regretted it." (Moe's wry rejoinder was "She didn't have to work the blast furnaces.") There were only three Party families in the town, quite a difference from the thirty or forty Party friends they left behind in Strawberry Mansion. While Moe worked the furnaces and tried to develop contacts with plant workers, Sarah joined a folk dance group at the local "Y," where she got to know Greek, Yugoslav, Italian, and other immigrant women. Moe, limited in the plant to a small Party circle of colonizers and sympathizers, was able to socialize with the husbands of Sarah's folk dancing partners. Colonizers often ended up working with a local Party apparatus while their wives, working through neighborhood networks, reached into the community through its women, older people, and children. Asie Repice casually but proudly concluded about her work with a community center during the war years; "I am an organizer, so I organized a nursery." Her husband was in the service. Moving around to stay close to his base, she put her organizing abilities and political values to work. Such efforts remain an unwritten chapter in the history of radical organizing.^26 */functionaries/* Few district functionaries other than Sam Darcy achieved any national stature or had much leverage outside the district. Dave Davis, the business manager of UE Local 155 and an importantPhiladelphia-area labor leader, was often elected to the Party's national committee but never entered the inner decision-making group. Other district leaders—like Pat Toohey, Phil Bart, Phil Frankfeld, and Ed Strong—were D.O.s sent into the district and then moved out again to other assignments. Most district functionaries played dominant roles within the district committee and ran such important Party operations as the local Progressive Party and the Civil Rights Congress. They drew meager salaries, which were sometimes supplemented by Party-related employment. The Party network, at least during the late thirties and forties, could place members in some union jobs.^27 Possibly several dozen members depended on the Party for their livelihood in this way. */nonmembers/* One often encounters Communists who, for very specific reasons, were not formal Party members. One former Progressive Party leader never joined the Party but worked closely with district Communist leaders to map strategy and coordinate activity. Some union leaders stayed out of the Party to deny employers the red-baiting weapon, and a number dropped out after the Taft-Hartley Act made a union officer liable to prosecution for perjury if he lied about current Party membership.^28 */professionals/* Some professionals who joined the Party operated at a rank-and-file level, belonging to a professional branch or club, attending meetings, and fulfilling subscription quotas. Several recall being highly impressed with the other professionals they met at Party functions. But such members—often doctors, dentists, and architects—were on the margins of Party life. Many professionals, especially lawyers associated with Party causes, found membership problematic and chose not to formalize their relationships with the Party, though they might be members of a professional club. "I fought against loose tongues," one states."I never asked a soul whether they were Communists or not." Several left-wing attorneys stress that they did not want to be in a position to betray anyone or risk a perjury charge if questioned about their own affiliations and associations. The law in America is a conservative profession, and several Left lawyers paid a high price for their efforts.^29 Another consideration was that the Party sometimes pressured lawyers to use a particular legal strategy in Party-related cases, and such pressure was more effectively applied to members.^30 One attorney notes that the Party itself seemed ambivalent about requiring formal membership. A few district leaders pressured him to join, while others understood that it was not particularly useful or necessary. Some lawyers, whether members or not, found their services very much in demand. They were needed in labor negotiations, electoral activities, and civil rights and civil liberties cases. In the late forties and early fifties, Party-affiliated lawyers found it less easy than it had been to earn a living through Party-based clients, such as left-wing unions. Instead they were called upon to deal with the titanic task of defending Party members indicted under the Smith Act and other pieces of repressive legislation. Thanks to this demand, as one attorney suggests, they received special treatment from the district leadership. They mixed with labor leaders, politicians, judges, and, at times, the national Party leadership. Several had more contact with the non-Communist local authorities than district functionaries had. One left-wing attorney recalls that he had the luxury of criticizing Party policies and decisions, within limits, because "I was needed, I was special, a lawyer." More significant than membership was the degree of autonomy a member had, and this was based on his importance to the Party or his institutional leverage. A professional could get away with criticism of the Nazi-Soviet Pact that would not be tolerated from rank-and-filers or most cadres. A union leader could ignore Party instructions, aware that his own organization was his power base. A former Communist, George Charney, criticizes in his memoirsthe "left-wing aristocracy of labor that rarely mingled with the herd of party members or the middle functionaries."^31 Such trade-unions "influentials" often had contempt for functionaries and would go over their heads to top leadership. Those who entered the Party, at whatever level, in whatever role, operated within a well-defined organization and lived within a somewhat insular and often nurturing subculture that provided them with formal and informal relationships. These relationships eased the often lonely organizing work. One veteran unashamedly calls his fellow Communist organizers "the most dedicated, most selfless people in the struggle." Many would share Jessica Mitford's feelings: I had regarded joining the Party as one of the most important decisions of my adult life. I loved and admired the people in it, and was more than willing to accept the leadership of those far more experienced than I. Furthermore, the principle of democratic centralism seemed to me essential to the functioning of a revolutionary organization in a hostile world.^32 Any tendency to romanticize such activists must be tempered by an awareness of their mistakes, limitations, and weaknesses, and it is true that many non-Communists made similar commitments to organizing the oppressed and the weak. They too merit consideration. These Philadelphia veterans of the Communist Party are very human actors who worked on a particular historical stage. Some conclude that their years of effort never really brought any of their factory and shop constituents into the movement. Like Sol Davis, they admit that they were utter failures in that "cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland" of blue-collar America. Others share the pride, perhaps the arrogance, of one of Vivian Gornick's subjects: We're everywhere, everywhere. We/saved/this f--king country. We went to Spain, and because we did America understood fascism. We made Vietnam come to an end, we're in there inWatergate. We built the CIO, we got Roosevelt elected, we started black civil rights, we forced this sh-tty country into every piece of action and legislation it has ever taken. We did the dirty work and the Labor and Capital establishments got the rewards. The Party helped make democracy work.^33 The road from Spain to Watergate is a long one. Communists, euphoric at their prospects in the heyday of CIO sit-downs and Popular Front triumphs, later needed remarkable inner resources to sustain political activity. They sensed the first tremors from the purge trials, received a severe jolt from the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, and in the postwar years faced first political repression and then, more painfully, internal disintegration and demoralization. NEXT CHAPTER seven: problems and crises, 1939–1956 the founder of Black Lives Matter once described herself as a trained , like Obama, but I could only find this: https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ On 10/17/22 10:32 someone wrote:
Since many believe Obama is running the Marxist Biden administration We might want to look at a history of comnunist organizing, euphemistically called a community organizing https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/philadelphia-communists-1936-1956/section/c5cbd6e3-ed24-4bcb-97b0-da424fc58416 */the communist as organizer/* In the period between the Great Crash and the McCarthy era the CPUSA was the most effective organizing agency within the American experience.^1 In this most politically stable of societies, radicals have usually battered their heads against the stone wall of affluence, rising expectations, and Democratic Party loyalty. Within the narrow space of agitation allowed by the political order, Communist Party activists built a small but influential organization devoted to organizing constituencies for social change. According to even the most unsympathetic accounts, Communist activists played important roles in organizing the unemployed, evicted tenants, minorities, and workers in a wide variety of fields. They were central in the emergence of the CIO and thus in the organizing of workers in heavy industry and mass production; they spearheaded the defense of the right of black people to equality before the law and social and economic opportunity; and they participated in virtually all of the nationalefforts to establish humane social services and eliminate hunger, disease, and neglect from our communities.^2 Many analysts question the motives of Communist Party activists, and there certainly is controversy about the extent of their organizing successes. Nevertheless, Communist organizing merits serious and objective consideration. For a period of approximately thirty years, Communist Party activists and organizers sought out constituents in the mines, plants, and neighborhoods of the United States. Other left-wing groups, such as the Socialist Party, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party, and A. J. Muste's Workers Party, also deserve study, but the CPUSA offers students the best opportunity to examine the dynamics of organizing sponsored and directed by a radical political group.^3 The organizers under consideration came to political maturity during the 1930s, mostly in an era associated with the Popular Front, and remained within the Party until at least the mid-Fifties. Indeed, many remained active organizers and participants after leaving the organizational framework of the Communist Party. In the thirties and forties, they modified their Bolshevik rhetoric and participated in antifascist alliances, worked for modest short-term successes within the fledgling CIO, and provided support and manpower for a diverse group of radical and progressive political movements and leaders, including Democrats, Farmer-Laborites, the American Labor Party in New York, and Communist Party councilmen in New York City, all under an essentially New Deal banner.^4 Organizers operating in the greater Philadelphia district had important trade-union successes and played a key role in organizing unemployed councils, electoral efforts, tenant rights, and peace, professional lobbying, civil liberties, ethnically based, and neighborhood groups. For a period of approximately ten years, from 1936 to perhaps 1947, the Communist Party of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, District Three, played an important if modest role in the political life of the area, generating ideas, programs, and visions that later became the commonplaces of social policy. The Party offered its membership several roles. One could remain at the rank-and-file level, become a cadre, or rise to functionary. One could engage in mass work within one of the Party fronts or a non-Party organization (e.g., the YMCA) or one could become a "colonizer," engaging in industrial organizing at the beck and call of the Party. In addition, one could work within the professional section, providing the Party with such services as legal counsel.^5 */rank and file/* At the lowest level of Party membership were the rank and file, the proverbial "Jimmy Higginses" who worked within Party clubs and branches, paid their dues, went to a variety of meetings, and joined the mass organizations and fronts, often focusing on a specific issue like Spain, civil rights, or Scottsboro. Such rank-and-filers were at the heart of everyday activities and what Gornick calls "grinding ordinariness."^6 There was an extraordinary turnover among such members, who often became weary of meetings,/Daily Worker/solicitations, and office chores. Many rank-and-filers began their activism while in college or sometimes high school. The Philadelphia high school movement was quite sizable, including ASU and YCL chapters in at least eight schools. High school activists ranged throughout the city, meeting radical peers, socializing, and developing their own circle of comrades. For those who entered college either already active or about to be radicalized, there was an almost dizzying flow of activities, including demonstrations, marches, sit-downs, leaflettings, fundraisers, dances, parties, socials, lectures, speeches—and meetings. Always, there were meetings, one for every night of the week, often more.^7 Enthusiastic, recently converted Communists, like their spiritual children in the 1960s, had unbounded energy for political work. Most speak of being aroused and inspired by their sense of the significance of their efforts, the quality of their comrades, and the grandeur and power of their movement. Abe Shapiro recalls being engrossed at one time in the following activities: formal YCL meetings, ASU leadership, a universityantiwar council (of which he was director), Spanish civil war relief efforts, a variety of antifascist activities, a student-run bookstore cooperative, and support work for assorted civil liberties and civil rights causes. Some activists found schoolwork boring under the circumstances and devoted all of their time to politics. A few became "colonizers." In most cases, however, Communist students completed their degree work, and if they dropped out of school, it was often for financial reasons. For most, the excitement of campus politics held their attention and their interest. Some found Party youth work a path toward leadership, becoming citywide or national ASU or YCL leaders. Others on leaving campus became YCL branch or section organizers in different parts of the district. Many who did not attend college did neighborhood work with the YCL, often focusing their mass organizational efforts through the American League for Peace and Democracy. To many youthful rank-and-filers, "the YCL became . . . Marxist-Leninist theory all mixed up with baseball, screwing, dancing, selling the/Daily Worker/, bullsh-tting, and living the American-Jewish street life."^8 Certainly the first flush of radicalism, the emotional high of purposeful activity, the sense of accomplishment and of sacrifice for the good of humanity, the work with fine and noble comrades, the love affairs with those sharing a common vision, the expectation that the future was indeed theirs, created a honeymoon effect for most young Communists. For some, the fad of radicalism passed upon graduation or thereabouts. Others simply maintained a regular but distant "fellow-traveling" role as they entered the work world. And many were disillusioned by the Party's dogmatism or the great purge trials, the attacks on Trotsky, or the Non-Aggression Pact of 1939. Others, including those interviewed, remained in the Party. The shortest stay was six years, and most remained loyal for twenty years or more. For all of those who stayed, the Party and its small subculture became their lives. Those working at the branch, club, and section levels were rarely on the Party payroll and had to find work to supportthemselves. For single people problems were few and life could be lived at a double-time pace, working hard all day and then organizing and holding meetings every night. Some young Communists drifted for a time after school, doing Party work but not settling into anything. Ben Green lived in Strawberry Mansion, a lower-middle- and working-class Jewish neighborhood filled with Party people at the time. He did some work with the American League Against War and Fascism, spoke on street corners occasionally, went to three to four meetings a week, and helped to start a union local of public employees at his Works Progress Administration (WPA) office. He remembers that the Party "made it a big thing" when he shifted from the YCL to adult membership, but he was still looking at his future with uncertainty. Upon completing high school, George Paine felt that "sports were gone" from his life except for an occasional neighborhood basketball game. He kept in touch but saw less of old non-Party buddies and did standard political work, "hustling the paper," going to meetings, demonstrating. Finally he decided to go to college, suspending but not ending his Party ties. One rank-and-filer was a skilled craftsman, "glad of the class I was born into." He belonged to a conservative craft union and limited his political work to mass work at the local YMCA. He never really got involved with a club or branch group but paid his dues, subscribed to the paper, and worked with comrades to move the "Y" in a more "progressive" direction. He was quite open about his views, which would eventually get him into trouble at his job: "I felt that since to me everything was so clear, they'd hug me." Tim Palen, a farmer and skilled craftsman who lived in a rural suburb of Philadelphia, worked with the Farmers Union. A Party rank-and-filer, he helped farmers get low-interest loans through the union and sympathetic banks. Palen never involved himself with Party affairs in the city, and the highest office he held was dues secretary of his section. Since the Communist Party did not formally label members according to their rank, it is not always clear who was a rank-and-filer and who was considered cadre. One former district leader defines cadres as the people in training for leadership, like officers in an army. The rank and file are, therefore, foot soldiers, less involved and more a part of their own neighborhood or plant, more likely to hold conventional jobs, and more subject to pressures from neighbors, family, and changing circumstances. Annie Kriegel, who analyzes the French Communist Party as a set of concentric circles, places fellow travelers who vote for the Party and read the Sunday Party press on the "outer circle" and "ordinary party members" in the "first circle."^9 Many observers describe such rank-and-filers as less "Bolshevik"—that is, more likely to break Party discipline in everyday activity and closer to the behavior and sensibilities of their non-Party peers. Harvey Klehr puts it, "Many party members received no training of any kind, attendance at party meetings was often spotty, and members frequently ignored or failed to carry out assigned tasks."^10 Almond presents esoteric and exoteric models to distinguish rank-and-filer from cadre, suggesting that the Party daily press directed itself to the relatively idealistic and naive external members, while the Comintern, Cominform, and internal Party journals spoke to insiders and sophisticated activists.^11 */cadre/* The cadre has a "personal commitment." He or she is a "true Bolshevik," internally Communized, with an almost priestly function and sense of specialness. The cadre is a "professional revolutionary" along Leninist lines.^12 Philip Selznick adds that cadres are "deployable personnel," available to the Party at all times.^13 Some observers use "cadre" interchangeably with "functionary," while others distinguish them. I interpret "functionary" as a more administrative and executive role, usually carrying more authority and generally associated with top district and national leadership.^14 Cadres were field workers, organizers, sometimes on the payroll but often holding a non-Party job. Some more mobile cadres lefttheir own neighborhoods, but most worked at least within their home districts. (Functionaries, on the other hand, could be homegrown and district-bound or at the service of the national, even international, office.) Many studies exaggerate the distinction between inner core and outer rings because of their dependence on the abstractions of Party tracts. Almond, for example, claims that the "true Communist" was beyond any commitment to the Popular Front since he was presumably fully Bolshevized and aware of the duplicity and tactical nature of moderated rhetoric. Perhaps this is true of the national leadership, who had associations with Moscow, training at the Lenin School, and Comintern experience. At the district level, however, the patterns are not as clear and seem to be more sensitive to generational, class, and ethnic variables.^15 Among informants, the word "cadre" connoted "hard-working," "brave," "dogged," and "honorable"—someone who followed a Leninist model of behavior; "functionary," on the other hand, was often used negatively to imply that someone was "bureaucratic," "aloof," "abstract," and "remote from struggle"—in brief, the Stalinist/apparatchik/. Neither necessarily belonged to an inner core. Fred Garst tells of the "process of indoctrination" he underwent as he entered into Party life, beginning with "the regularity of systematic participation"—dues, meetings, selling Party literature. He says that the number of meetings began slowly to escalate to three, sometimes five a week: section and subsection meetings, executive meetings, front meetings. Next, Garst was asked to lead a discussion, then to take responsibility for organizing the distribution of literature. He started taking classes at a local Workers School in Marxist theory and labor history. His commitment grew, his experience deepened, and he soon became a section leader. Some Philadelphia Communists moved from rank-and-file to cadre roles during important political campaigns like theProgressive Party efforts of 1947–1948. One woman had been serving in a minor capacity—"not anything earth-shattering"—but was swept up by what Wallace referred to as "Gideon's Army." She became a full-time Progressive Party organizer at a district level, her "first real organizing"; from that point on, she was fully involved in Party work at a variety of levels. Some cadres emphasized front and mass work, serving as leaders of IWO ethnic groups, youth groups, and defense groups. Such cadres were particularly likely to operate clandestinely, although many communicated their affilitation all but formally to constituents. Cadres can be distinguished by their level of operation (club, branch, section, or district), by their funding (on the payroll or holding a regular job), by their relative mobility and willingness to do political work outside their own milieu, and, finally, by the type of organizing they did (mass or front work, electoral party work, industrial organizing). The most prestigious cadres were those who did full-time industrial organizing at the will of the Party leadership. Such organizers, whether of working-class origins or not and whether indigenous or colonizers, were the heart of Party operations, seeking to develop a proletarian constituency and a trade-union base. /ny tisa/ ny Tisa's history shows what an experienced organizer could accomplish. Tisa, a second-generation son of illiterate, working-class peasants, went to work at the Campbell's Soup plant in his own South Camden "Little Italy" after completing high school in the early 1930s. While working summers at the plant, he had been stimulated by street-corner radical speakers and had joined the Socialist Party, which had a presence at Campbell's Soup. The Socialists sent him to Brookwood Labor College, where he met young Communists who impressed him with their earnestness and apparent lack of factionalism, a problem he encountered among the Socialists. He returned to help organize the plant, starting with a small group of about a half-dozen Italian workers, none of themCommunists, whom he molded through a discussion group. His group received a federal charter from the American Federation of Labor and began to develop an underground, dues-paying membership. Tisa tells of frustrating experiences within the conservative AFL. At the 1939 convention in Tampa, for example, he found himself accidently strolling into a local walk-out of Del Monte workers, just as the police were arresting the leader. He spoke to thery workers and was himself threatened with arrest. The workers exclaimed, "You got Bo [the arrested leader] but you're not gonna get him," and made a ring to escort Tisa to a streetcar. That evening, at his suggestion, there was a union meeting, packed and excited. When Tisa tried to speak about this remarkable experience at the AFL convention, he was refused the floor. Finally he simply took over the podium and microphone. Later that day, he met with other militants, including Communists, to organize the ClO-affiliated Food, Tobacco and Agricultural Workers Union. He took a detour, however, as events in Spain captured his energies and idealism. Tisa served two years in Spain with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, gaining "a sense of internationalism that never escapes you." On his return, he immediately set out to organize Campbell's Soup. At the time Tisa began to organize it, Campbell's Soup employed about 5,500 full-time workers, with another 5,000 part-timers who came in during the heavy season. At least half the workers were of Italian descent; there were few blacks until the late 1940s. About half the work force was female. There was a sexual division of labor based on physical strength. Tisa's organizing group consisted of eleven or twelve key workers, all leftists, mostly Italian. None were "colonizers." All were indigenous workers who, under Tisa's leadership, planned the unionization of Campbell's. Tisa recalls that the group would often go crabbing and then return to his home to eat, drink, and talk strategy. Tisa was the only member of the group on the national union's payroll; he made a bare ten or fifteen dollars a week. The organizers distributed themselves through the plant, reaching out to obvious sympathizers and picking up useful information that they would relay to Tisa, who could not enter the plant. He would take names and visit workers in their homes, signing them up so that the union could hold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election. He would also cull information about working conditions from his organizers and publish it in a union bulletin that they distributed clandestinely, each carrying five to ten copies. As their numbers increased, they became bolder and distributed the much discussed bulletin openly. Campbell's Soup had Tisa arrested once, but when he was released, many workers came to greet him. He assured them that the law permitted them to organize a union. The company tried many tactics to block his efforts: they started a company union; they charged that he was a "Red" and had raped nuns and killed priests in Spain. But Tisa lived in an Italian neighborhood among plant workers and had a mother who had worked in the plant for many years (cheering his speeches, often at the wrong times, he wryly and lovingly notes); he could not be red-baited easily. He was an open Communist; his neighbors would say, "ny's a Communist, but he's all right." Despite the real barrier of the workers'traditional Catholicism, he produced traditional trade-union benefits for members and was popular enough locally, a neighbor, to remain in leadership until the CIO purges of the late forties and early fifties finally forced him out. Tisa's experience highlights the importance of developing indigenous personnel in organizing activity. His efforts were certainly bolstered by support from the national union, by Communist Party training and aid, and by the relative benevolence of the federal government as expressed through the new NLRB. Yet the presence of local activists, something the Communist Party sought but did not often achieve, invariably made the task of organizing a plant or neighborhood that much easier. Other organizers performed similar roles without formally entering the Party, preferring to remain independent although generally taking positions consistent with Party policy. /jack ryan/ Jack Ryan's old man was "a union man," later a foreman, a local Democratic politician, and a bootlegger. As a teen-ager, and a high school drop-out, Ryan ran poker and crap games in the neighborhood with a group of friends, some of whom wound up in prison. He worked sporadically as a roofer, during which time he was influenced by a socialist "who couldn't read or write until he was twenty-three." His father finally got him a job at a local plant, where he worked as a crane operator in the early Depression years until he was laid off in 1931. Over the next two years, he tried a small store and "managed to hang on," selling water ice and running crap games. In 1933 he went back to the plant just at the point when the local union was being formed. Ryan recalls that he was "sworn in in an elevator with the lights out in between the floors." Despite his emerging radical politics, Ryan remained on the margins at first. "I deliberately didn't get active," he says, indicating that life seemed too unpredictable to take chances. In fact, he entered into a real-estate business on the side, and it eventually provided him with the cushion that allowed him to become more active within the plant. Initially he ran for the general committee, backed by the other crane operators because of his successful grievance work. Still cautious ("I kept my mouth shut," he notes), Ryan went along with the conservative local leadership while maintaining contact with the plant militants, several of whom were old Wobblies suspicious of any Communist Party leadership. Ryan worked primarily through his own crane operators' network within the plant. He played the trade-offs in union posts among the plant's crafts to become local president, an unpaid post, and finally business representative, the only salaried position within the local. Ryanremained close to the Party but never joined. "I was more radical than they were," he brags. He criticizes their twists and turns and suggests that "in the end you can't trust any of them" because of "the goddamn line." He adds that the/Daily Worker/was "written for a bunch of morons." On the other hand, Ryan admits that Party union members were often competent and successful organizers and that he agreed with most of their Popular Front stances, particularly their antifascism. On the Soviets, he says that he did not spend too much time thinking about them, but adds, "I don't blame them for having a treaty with the Germans." Ryan is clearly concerned with the practical issues of trade unionism. In describing one of his national officers, he exclaims, "A dedicated Communist but a helluva guy." He praises L. Lewis's efforts at industrial unionization: "him and the Commies put together the CIO; they were the smartest crowd." So Jack Ryan worked with but kept some distance from "the Commies": "they were a little bit nutty." His union was one of those expelled from the CIO in the late forties, and he remains bitter about the Party's role in the union's decline. He remained active, holding union office on and off until his retirement. Ryan proudly concludes that he was placed on Social Security while on strike for the last time in the early seventies. ny Tisa and Jack Ryan were working-class organizers, with roots in their ethnic communities, able to establish a rapport with their peers and, at the same time, develop more sophisticated skills within a broader and more ideological movement in or around the Communist Party. Their failures were mostly exogenous, the results of Taft-Hartley oaths, CIO purges, and McCarthyism in general. Others operated in less favorable terrain, without the decided advantages of an indigenous, working-class background. The most characteristic Party labor organizer was a young, educated, second-generation Jewish-American sent to "dig roots into the working-class." The efforts of such organizers were prodigious; their accomplishments, however, were more problematic. /al schwartz/ Al Schwartz's father was a 1905er, a Party organizer in the garment industry who had to open a small shop after he was blacklisted. Al, a classic "red-diaper baby," went through all of the Party developmental steps, from Young Pioneers through YCL to full Party involvement. Most of all he wanted to be a radical journalist. For a few years he was able to work on the Pennsylvania supplement to the/Worker/, but when it folded, his journalism career seemed over. Over the next half-dozen years, Schwartz, now in his late twenties, went into the shops as a "colonizer." He remembers the sense of adventure and mission he felt working at a few of the larger heavy industrial plants in the area. Yet he also speaks of his sense of loss and defeat in having to aban hopes of writing. Schwartz's response to colonizing was painfully ambivalent: a college graduate and a Jew, born and bred within the Yiddish-Left subculture, he both relished the contact with blue-collar workers and remained distant from them. They were not like him, he stresses; they were mired in back-breaking labor, poor educations, and plebian forms of leisure. For a time he enjoyed the camaraderie of the local taverns, but ultimately he was an outsider, a Jewish family man and a struggling intellectual. Schwartz most fondly recalls the hardness and fitness of his body, the feeling that he was young and strong and physically a worker. But the successes were few, and later the McCarthy period made such Party efforts even more marginal. Schwartz found himself a family man in his mid-thirties without a career or a profession; frustrated and drifting out of Party life without drama or flourish, he moved to reorganize his life. His political values held, but his colonizing days were over. /sol davis/ Sol Davis grew up in a poor, working-class, immigrant household. He was a bright young boy, and like many other upwardly aspiring Jewish males, he flourished at the elite Central High School andbegan moving toward a professional career. At this point, in the early years of the Depression, he was swept off his feet, as he puts it, by the Communist Party. After completing his schooling, he worked lackadaisically at his profession while seeking an opportunity to go into the shops as a Communist Party organizer; he was "determined to be shop worker." His first attempts allowed him to learn something about machinery, although in each instance he was fired for his inexperience and incompetence. Finally he caught on. "I was in my element," he asserts, describing the war years in heavy industry. For Davis, the good organizer had to have a commitment to "the principles of Communism," "a talent for leadership," and a willingness to listen. A confident speaker, whose words are clipped and terse, he worked twenty-nine years in the shops, twenty-six of them at one plant. Located within the city, the plant was staffed mostly by Catholic workers (Polish or Irish), initially few blacks, and even fewer Jews. Davis's recollections are filled with bitter refrains about red-baiting and "turn-coat ex-CPers," sell-outs and "social democrats." He is proud of his successes, which include chairing the grievance committee and serving as shop steward during most of his union years. Davis presents his life as devoted to organizing in the shops; he never got involved in his neighborhood and tended to leave Party electoral work to others. A hard-line orthodox Communist still, Davis argues that those who abandoned the Party were "petty-bourgeois with petty-bourgeois ideas," whereas he "was nursed out of the trade-union movement." In the fifties, he admits, "life became unpleasant," both in his largely Jewish lower-middle-class neighborhood and in the shop, where "a certain resistance developed to my activity" among people he calls anti-Communist socialists. Davis believes that most American workers have been bought off in "discrete and discernible fashion" by imperialist profits, manipulated by the mass media, and blinded by nationalism, religion, and racism. After spending almost thirty years in theindustrial heartland, Davis remains "dedicated to an idea," an "unquestioned belief" in communism. Yet when asked about his ability to convert workers to class consciousness, a saddened Sol Davis replies, "Never—the shop was a desert for me." He did not convert a single worker and was "in that respect an utter failure." The shops, to the stoical Davis, were "a cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland despite having made so many friends." Sol Davis has kept the faith since he was "baptized" in the movement; his singular lack of organizing success rests, in his mind, on factors beyond his control—repression, cowardice, self-interest. He is a confident man. / caldwell/ Other colonizers had more mixed results. Caldwell, a college graduate with a middle-class WASP heritage, recalls that in his initial colonizing effort, "I wasn't very smart and made a lot of stupid mistakes—talked to people, became known as a troublemaker." He was fired. Fortunately for Caldwell, his firing made him a "celebrated case," and the predominantly Irish and Italian Catholic workers, and even the conservative union officials, rallied to his support. Caldwell says that whereas other Party organizers had their best contact in their own departments, he touched bases throughout the plant and often socialized at the local bar to maintain and develop relationships. "A fair number knew I was a Communist," he says. "I never denied it." But most did not. In most plants to admit membership in the Party meant probable firing and certain harassment. For organizers like Caldwell, discretion was the rule. His efforts paid off against the union's local establishment. The national, a left-wing union, sent in an organizer to help fashion a local coalition to defeat the established group, and Caldwell worked with him as elections chairman. The progressive slate was successful. Caldwell, a leader of a left-wing veterans' group, participated in the 1946 strike surge. When mounted police chased people ontoporches in Southwest Philadelphia to break up injunction-defying demonstrations, the local CIO was able to bring out 25,000 workers to protest against police brutality in front of City Hall. But such Popular Front-style unified efforts were shattered by the developing Cold War consensus, which began to drive radicals, particularly Party members, out of the unions. Caldwell shifted jobs in this period, finally taking a full-time organizing job in a nearby industrial town. The plant had some IWO members and a few Party members, but no organization. Caldwell, who observes that "it really became difficult after the Korean War" started, found some success in putting out a small paper and handing it out at the main gates. He worked to develop contacts mainly by distributing the Party paper, first for free, then by subscription. Caldwell remembers proudly that he won a district drive with eighty subscriptions in his area. Gains were modest: a Hungarian sympathizer sent him two black shop stewards; then a few Irish Catholics made contact. Caldwell recalls going into Philadelphia to see prize fights with the latter workers, mixing pleasure with discussions of possible articles about their area for the Party press. But the times wrecked any chance Caldwell had of developing a Party group. The FBI scared off possible sympathizers; he was arrested for circulating antiwar petitions, and the venture finally ended in the heyday of the McCarthy period when Caldwell was sent to join the Party's underground. Caldwell and Al Schwartz experienced the ebb of the progressive union movement in the late forties and early fifties. Most Party labor organizers and colonizers, however, joined the fray during the extraordinary upsurge of the late thirties that established industrial unionism through the CIO. /milt goldberg/ Milt Goldberg, despite winning a Mayor's Scholarship, was unable to continue his education after graduating from Central High School. Instead, he scratched to make a living at odd jobs, gradually becoming interested in radical politics. While he wasworking a pre-Christmas job at Sears, the department store warehousemen went out on strike. Clerks refused to cross the picket lines. Goldberg recalls that the increasingly anxious owners persuaded the clerks to return to work with promises of improved conditions and wage increases that were never fulfilled; meanwhile, the warehousemen settled. In the aftermath, the strike leaders were all fired. Goldberg says that many of them were Communists and that he began to notice how often that was the case: "I respected the Party people; they were able, talented people." Goldberg became an organizer for a white-collar union dominated by mobsters who made deals with management at the expense of the membership. He describes his early efforts as "naive, inexperienced." Goldberg played a key role in leading his membership out of the corrupt union into a new CIO local, whose Philadelphia office staff was dominated by Party organizers. In those days, the late thirties, the era of sit-downs and a crescendo of collective bargaining agreements, organizing was remarkably fluid. Goldberg says that charters were granted easily and with little need for substantiation or the apparatus of negotiation soon to appear under the NLRB. In those days, he asserts with some nostalgia, one could go in and organize a place in one or two days, present demands to the employer, and make a deal. Such rapid victories were, of course, exceptions; Goldberg also recalls the often brutal resistance of management, particularly in heavy industry. After serving in the war, Goldberg returned to his union efforts, despite family advice that he try something more prestigious and lucrative. The union was his life, so he stayed. He never formally rejoined the Party, although he remained in close contact. The Taft-Harley anti-Communist oath soon reinforced this decision. Nevertheless, Goldberg and his small union were red-baited and constantly under McCarthyite attack. How did he survive? Goldberg argues that he "was very close to the membership" and had solid support from his fellow leaders. He emphasizes that the union provided real benefits and servicesto membership and sustained their loyalty despite the attacks. In addition, he notes that by this time the small union did not have a Party group, only him. One of the more damaging policies of Party-dominated unions was what Goldberg calls "the resolution bit"—the passing of Party-sponsored resolutions on every issue from Scottsboro to Spain. Too many left-wing unions manipulated such resolutions without making any effort to educate the membership; all that mattered was that local such-and-such of the so-and-so workers sent a resolution attacking Franco's dictatorship in Spain. Goldberg dropped such tactics in the postwar period, instead working with his local's officers and servicing the practical needs of the membership. By the mid-fifties, still a socialist, Milt Goldberg had become estranged from the Communist Party. As is true of most arts, the qualities that make for a successful organizer are uncertain and descriptions are inevitably cliche-ridden. As the experiences of ny Tisa and Jack Ryan indicate, having roots in the work force being organized gives one a decided advantage. But the Party could use only the troops it had available, and these were for the most part educated, urban, Jewish Americans, most of whom had no experience in the heavy industries that were their "colonies." Most of them experienced frustration; one cadre estimates that 95 percent of all Party colonizers failed. Too often colonizers were unable to operate in a sea of Gentile proletarians. Fred Garst, stillry at the Party for its insensitivity to context, charges that "the Left didn't have any organizing skills." But some organizers, remarkably, succeeded. /ike samuels/ Ike Samuels still speaks with an accent that reveals the years he spent in Eastern Europe before his mother, taking the remains of the family silver, arrived in the United States. No red-diaper baby, Samuels describes his youth as "street-wise" and his ambition as making it in America. Like many others, however, "the whole thing burst into flame" when the Depression forced him to dropout of school and hunger marches, bonus marches, and unemployed council protests acted on his emerging social conscience. Soon he was moving toward the Party and engaging in union organizing. Samuels, a gruff, self-deprecating man who often refers to his "big mouth," rose to leadership within a small craft union and served on the city CIO council. His CIO union was dominated by a Popular Front coalition of the Party and a progressive Catholic group. The union president, a leader of the latter, was incompetent; on several occasions Samuels had to bail him out of collective-bargaining disasters. Finally the Catholic faction and the Party faction sought to replace the president with Samuels. The national Party leadership, however, afraid of upsetting the delicate coalition, said no. Samuels recalls that he "didn't even question" the decision, but he was frustrated and soon left the union to become an organizer for a larger, industrial union. Samuels agrees with Milt Goldberg that it was relatively easy to be a good organizer in that period. Labor was in an upswing, workers were clamoring to be organized, NLRB cards were easy to accumulate. In heavy industry, Samuels stresses, the key was to seek out the pockets of old radical workers—not colonizers, he emphasizes—who had broken down the old ethnic barriers. Many such organizers were members of the IWO foreign-language federations. Next, one needed the "pie-cards," the full-time organizers supplied by the CIO itself, many of whom were veteran radicals. Along with and sometimes among the pie-cards were the younger Communists going into the shops, supported by a growing and confident Party organization. A "highly developed structure," Samuels recalls, was essential to organizing success. One had to develop shop committees and day-to-day contacts in each department. The sense of strength provided by the union itself and, crucially, by its CIO sponsor, allowed workers to imagine that the employers could be successfully challenged. In the automobile, steel, rubber, mining, and electrical equipment industries, workers facedmammoth corporations willing to use any means necessary to throw back the unionist surge. The New Deal, by encouraging a more neutral judiciary and law enforcement role, made it easier for the coordinated CIO drives to gain concessions from corporate heads. Samuels suggests that the workers, some of whom had backed decades of unsuccessful rank-and-file efforts, needed the sense that they were a part of a powerful coalition. L. Lewis appealed to this sense when he proclaimed, "The President want you to join a union." Such a coalition advanced unionization at the same time that it necessitated concessions and strictures that limited the leverage of the newly legitimized unions.^16 Samuels argues that it was imperative for organizers to have knowledge of their industries. He deliberately worked in a craft shop to learn the trade and later carefully studied one heavy industry before going out to organize its workers. He was not typical. Hodee Edwards, a thirties organizer, stresses "our consistent failure to investigate the neighborhoods and factories where we tried to work, thus applying a generalized, sectarian plan usually incomprehensible to those we wanted to reach."^17 And Sam Katz suggests that the Party did not always recognize the tension between the leadership and the activist/organizer over the pace and nature of organizing. The functionaries often pushed for the most advanced positions, including the "resolutions bit," whereas the organizers focused on the issues that confronted their constituents. Conflict was inevitable between broad policy and local needs and variations, and between policy planners and functionaries and field organizers and the rank and file. It is clear that the Communist Party suffered chronically from top-heavy decision making, which often left local organizers and members with policy directives that made little sense in local circumstances. In addition to organizational strength and preparation, Samuels feels that leadership ability and, at times, personal courage must be demonstrated. On several occasions he had to take risks or lose the confidence of his membership. In one local the workers affectionately referred to him as "R.R.J.B.," Red Russian JewBastard. He tells of organizing workers in a small Georgia company town. Fifteen hundred were on strike, and the patriarchal owners were negotiating only under pressure from the NLRB. They were stalling, however, so Samuels called on the work force to increase the pressure by massing outside the building where the negotiations were taking place. The next day, in the midst of bargaining, Samuels noticed the face of the company's attorney turning an ash white as he glanced out the window. What he saw were about three hundred workers marching toward the building carrying a rope; lynching was on their agenda. Samuels went out and calmed them down, "modified" their demands, and then wrapped up negotiations. His early organizing days also included maritime struggles with gangster elements who were not beyond "bumping off" militants. Samuels implies that the Left elements fought back, sometimes resorting to their own brand of physical intimidation.^18 Peggy Dennis describes the Bolshevik ideal as "soldiers in a revolutionary army at permanent war with a powerful class enemy." And "in permanent war, doubts or questions are treason."^19 Yet as Joseph Starobin asks, "How could the Leninist equilibrium be sustained in a country so different from Lenin's?"^20 In fact, it was sustained unevenly and at a price. In a society with a tradition of civil liberties (albeit inconsistently applied and occasionally suspended in moments of stress) and a remarkably resilient political democracy, the Leninist model, hardened and distorted by Stalinism, mixed uncomfortably with American realities.^21 At its best the Leninist ideal encouraged the incredible levels of hard work and perseverance that even critics of Communism grant to its cadres; it also evoked such personal qualities as integrity, courage, honesty, and militancy. Yet the ideal seemed to degenerate too easily into a model of behavior appropriately labeled Stalinist. Communist cadres accepted deceptive tactics and strategies that inevitably backfired and undermined theirintegrity and reputations—for example, the front groups that "flip-flopped" at Party command after years of denying Party domination. The intolerance and viciousness with which Communists often attacked adversaries, including liberals, socialists, and their own heretics, remains inexcusable.^22 As organizers, Communist activists suffered from a tendency toward a special kind of elitism that often made them incapable of working with diverse groups sharing common goals. In some periods they turned this streak of inhumanity against themselves, engaging in ugly campaigns of smear and character assassination to eliminate "Titoists," "Browderites," "revisionists," "left-wing adventurists," or "white chauvinists." Moreover, the secrecy within which Communists often operated, while sometimes justified by the danger of job loss or prosecution, served to undermine the Party's moral legitimacy. An organizer's relationship with his constituents depends on their belief in his integrity, and this is especially true when the organizer is an outsider. Too often, Communists undermined their own integrity by covering manipulative and cynical acts with the quite plausible explanation that survival required secrecy. The tendency of Communists to resort to First and Fifth Amendment protection during the McCarthy period falls under similar challenges. As Joseph Starobin asks: Should left-wingers and Communists have gone to jail in large numbers? Might they have been better off/politically/, in terms of their/image/, to assert their affiliations, to proclaim them instead of asserting their right to keep them private, to explain the issues as they saw them, and to take the consequences?^23 Communist activists certainly did not lack courage or commitment to a protracted struggle. Many risked prison, and some served prison sentences; perhaps as many as one-third of the cadres painfully accepted assignments to go underground in the early fifties. Their Leninism had to navigate contradictory currents of Stalinism and Americanization, militancy and opportunism. Local Communist activists often lived a somewhat schizophrenic life, alternately internationalist and indigenous, Bolshevik and "progressive," admiring the Leninist model of cadre and yet falling into more settled, familial patterns of activism. There was a clear if often ignored sexual division of labor: men were more likely to be the cadres, women performed auxiliary clerical functions and unnoticed but essential neighborhood organizing. The Party was also divided between theorists and intellectuals on the one hand and field workers and activists on the other. As one field worker proclaimed, "I couldn't be spending hours on ideological conflicts; I'm an activist, not an intellectual." Many agree that the bulk of an organizer's time went into local actions and much less went into discussions and considerations of important theoretical or programmatic matters.^24 Only a small proportion received the type of ideological and intellectual training suggested by the Leninist ideal, an ideal that formally sought the obliteration of the distinctions between thought and action, intellectual and activist. In fact, Party intellectuals faced chronic and ingrained suspicion, even contempt, from Party leaders. Abe Shapiro sardonically charges that the function of Party intellectuals was "to sell the/Daily Worker/at the waterfront." He remembers checking on a new Party document on the economy: "I actually read the document. I wanted to know what the Hell it was." He found it infantile and far below what well-trained but never used Party intellectuals and social scientists could have produced. The Party rarely, except for showcase purposes, relied on its trained intellectual or academic members; instead, it called on Party functionaries, often of very narrow training, to write about complex sociological, economic, and scientific matters. Theory suffered as a result, and the Party, particularly after 1939, included very few intellectuals. Until the mid-fifties crisis, the Party, strangled by Stalinist dogma and intolerance, was closed to intellectual discourse. Abe Shapiro finally left the Party because his intellectual training hadgiven him a commitment to intellectual honesty that he could not shake. Among organizers, Party arrogance cut off messages from the grass roots. Orders from what one veteran calls "the Cave of Winds"—Party headquarters in New York—often contradicted practical organizing experience. The Party also suffered from insularity. Mark Greenly brought interested fellow workers to a Party-dominated union meeting. They were curious and "antiboss" but quite unsophisticated and not at all ready to make any commitments. Unfortunately, the Party organizer immediately started to discuss class struggle and a variety of abstract political matters. The workers were quickly alienated and frightened away, never to return. Ethel Paine recalls such "inappropriate behavior" as the sectarian conversations Party people would carry on in the presence of non-Communist acquaintances and neighbors. Although chronically secretive about membership, Communists could be remarkably insensitive to their audience in revealing ways. A successful organizer learned when and how to introduce more controversial ideas to nonmembers. Training, including the Party schools, helped to some extent, but most Communists agree with the veteran organizer who feels that such learning has to be done on the job, by trial and error. Many Communists, like Sam Katz and Caldwell, tell painful if sometimes hilarious tales of their own and others' ineptitude as beginning organizers. Some discovered that they simply were not suited for the job and would never develop the personal qualities that make for a competent organizer. Several veterans insist that organizers are born, not made. Yet relatively introverted and socially awkward young people, inspired by the idealism and the comradeship of the Communist movement, did transform themselves into effective organizers. Vivian Gornick points out that such transformations did not always survive the collapse of association with the Party.^25 I did not, however, discover total or near total personality changes caused either by joining or abandoning the Party. Although most of the literature about radical organizers deals with men, it is increasingly apparent that some of the mostsignificant and consistently ignored organizing within the Communist Party involved women. The ten women interviewed performed a rich variety of Party tasks, but perhaps the most important were those not officially designated, like the informal neighborhood activities organized by Edith Samuels, described inChapter Five . Sarah Levy was also involved in such efforts. Sarah and her two children joined her colonizer husband, Moe, in leaving the comfortable Party concentration in the Strawberry Mansion section to live in a nearby industrial town. She refers to the next three and a half years as "not the easiest times and, yet to me, personally, one of the best growing experiences—and I have never regretted it." (Moe's wry rejoinder was "She didn't have to work the blast furnaces.") There were only three Party families in the town, quite a difference from the thirty or forty Party friends they left behind in Strawberry Mansion. While Moe worked the furnaces and tried to develop contacts with plant workers, Sarah joined a folk dance group at the local "Y," where she got to know Greek, Yugoslav, Italian, and other immigrant women. Moe, limited in the plant to a small Party circle of colonizers and sympathizers, was able to socialize with the husbands of Sarah's folk dancing partners. Colonizers often ended up working with a local Party apparatus while their wives, working through neighborhood networks, reached into the community through its women, older people, and children. Asie Repice casually but proudly concluded about her work with a community center during the war years; "I am an organizer, so I organized a nursery." Her husband was in the service. Moving around to stay close to his base, she put her organizing abilities and political values to work. Such efforts remain an unwritten chapter in the history of radical organizing.^26 */functionaries/* Few district functionaries other than Sam Darcy achieved any national stature or had much leverage outside the district. Dave Davis, the business manager of UE Local 155 and an importantPhiladelphia-area labor leader, was often elected to the Party's national committee but never entered the inner decision-making group. Other district leaders—like Pat Toohey, Phil Bart, Phil Frankfeld, and Ed Strong—were D.O.s sent into the district and then moved out again to other assignments. Most district functionaries played dominant roles within the district committee and ran such important Party operations as the local Progressive Party and the Civil Rights Congress. They drew meager salaries, which were sometimes supplemented by Party-related employment. The Party network, at least during the late thirties and forties, could place members in some union jobs.^27 Possibly several dozen members depended on the Party for their livelihood in this way. */nonmembers/* One often encounters Communists who, for very specific reasons, were not formal Party members. One former Progressive Party leader never joined the Party but worked closely with district Communist leaders to map strategy and coordinate activity. Some union leaders stayed out of the Party to deny employers the red-baiting weapon, and a number dropped out after the Taft-Hartley Act made a union officer liable to prosecution for perjury if he lied about current Party membership.^28 */professionals/* Some professionals who joined the Party operated at a rank-and-file level, belonging to a professional branch or club, attending meetings, and fulfilling subscription quotas. Several recall being highly impressed with the other professionals they met at Party functions. But such members—often doctors, dentists, and architects—were on the margins of Party life. Many professionals, especially lawyers associated with Party causes, found membership problematic and chose not to formalize their relationships with the Party, though they might be members of a professional club. "I fought against loose tongues," one states."I never asked a soul whether they were Communists or not." Several left-wing attorneys stress that they did not want to be in a position to betray anyone or risk a perjury charge if questioned about their own affiliations and associations. The law in America is a conservative profession, and several Left lawyers paid a high price for their efforts.^29 Another consideration was that the Party sometimes pressured lawyers to use a particular legal strategy in Party-related cases, and such pressure was more effectively applied to members.^30 One attorney notes that the Party itself seemed ambivalent about requiring formal membership. A few district leaders pressured him to join, while others understood that it was not particularly useful or necessary. Some lawyers, whether members or not, found their services very much in demand. They were needed in labor negotiations, electoral activities, and civil rights and civil liberties cases. In the late forties and early fifties, Party-affiliated lawyers found it less easy than it had been to earn a living through Party-based clients, such as left-wing unions. Instead they were called upon to deal with the titanic task of defending Party members indicted under the Smith Act and other pieces of repressive legislation. Thanks to this demand, as one attorney suggests, they received special treatment from the district leadership. They mixed with labor leaders, politicians, judges, and, at times, the national Party leadership. Several had more contact with the non-Communist local authorities than district functionaries had. One left-wing attorney recalls that he had the luxury of criticizing Party policies and decisions, within limits, because "I was needed, I was special, a lawyer." More significant than membership was the degree of autonomy a member had, and this was based on his importance to the Party or his institutional leverage. A professional could get away with criticism of the Nazi-Soviet Pact that would not be tolerated from rank-and-filers or most cadres. A union leader could ignore Party instructions, aware that his own organization was his power base. A former Communist, George Charney, criticizes in his memoirsthe "left-wing aristocracy of labor that rarely mingled with the herd of party members or the middle functionaries."^31 Such trade-unions "influentials" often had contempt for functionaries and would go over their heads to top leadership. Those who entered the Party, at whatever level, in whatever role, operated within a well-defined organization and lived within a somewhat insular and often nurturing subculture that provided them with formal and informal relationships. These relationships eased the often lonely organizing work. One veteran unashamedly calls his fellow Communist organizers "the most dedicated, most selfless people in the struggle." Many would share Jessica Mitford's feelings: I had regarded joining the Party as one of the most important decisions of my adult life. I loved and admired the people in it, and was more than willing to accept the leadership of those far more experienced than I. Furthermore, the principle of democratic centralism seemed to me essential to the functioning of a revolutionary organization in a hostile world.^32 Any tendency to romanticize such activists must be tempered by an awareness of their mistakes, limitations, and weaknesses, and it is true that many non-Communists made similar commitments to organizing the oppressed and the weak. They too merit consideration. These Philadelphia veterans of the Communist Party are very human actors who worked on a particular historical stage. Some conclude that their years of effort never really brought any of their factory and shop constituents into the movement. Like Sol Davis, they admit that they were utter failures in that "cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland" of blue-collar America. Others share the pride, perhaps the arrogance, of one of Vivian Gornick's subjects: We're everywhere, everywhere. We/saved/this f--king country. We went to Spain, and because we did America understood fascism. We made Vietnam come to an end, we're in there inWatergate. We built the CIO, we got Roosevelt elected, we started black civil rights, we forced this sh-tty country into every piece of action and legislation it has ever taken. We did the dirty work and the Labor and Capital establishments got the rewards. The Party helped make democracy work.^33 The road from Spain to Watergate is a long one. Communists, euphoric at their prospects in the heyday of CIO sit-downs and Popular Front triumphs, later needed remarkable inner resources to sustain political activity. They sensed the first tremors from the purge trials, received a severe jolt from the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, and in the postwar years faced first political repression and then, more painfully, internal disintegration and demoralization. NEXT CHAPTER seven: problems and crises, 1939–1956 the founder of Black Lives Matter once described herself as a trained , like Obama, but I could only find this: https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ On 10/17/22 10:32 someone wrote: Since many believe Obama is running the Marxist Biden administration We might want to look at a history of comnunist organizing, euphemistically called a community organizing https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/philadelphia-communists-1936-1956/section/c5cbd6e3-ed24-4bcb-97b0-da424fc58416 */the communist as organizer/* In the period between the Great Crash and the McCarthy era the CPUSA was the most effective organizing agency within the American experience.^1
In this most politically stable of societies, radicals have usually battered their heads against the stone wall of affluence, rising expectations, and Democratic Party loyalty. Within the narrow space of agitation allowed by the political order, Communist Party activists built a small but influential organization devoted to organizing constituencies for social change. According to even the most unsympathetic accounts, Communist activists played important roles in organizing the unemployed, evicted tenants, minorities, and workers in a wide variety of fields. They were central in the emergence of the CIO and thus in the organizing of workers in heavy industry and mass production; they spearheaded the defense of the right of black people to equality before the law and social and economic opportunity; and they participated in virtually all of the nationalefforts to establish humane social services and eliminate hunger, disease, and neglect from our communities.^2
Many analysts question the motives of Communist Party activists, and there certainly is controversy about the extent of their organizing successes. Nevertheless, Communist organizing merits serious and objective consideration. For a period of approximately thirty years, Communist Party activists and organizers sought out constituents in the mines, plants, and neighborhoods of the United States. Other left-wing groups, such as the Socialist Party, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party, and A. J. Muste's Workers Party, also deserve study, but the CPUSA offers students the best opportunity to examine the dynamics of organizing sponsored and directed by a radical political group.^3
The organizers under consideration came to political maturity during the 1930s, mostly in an era associated with the Popular Front, and remained within the Party until at least the mid-Fifties. Indeed, many remained active organizers and participants after leaving the organizational framework of the Communist Party. In the thirties and forties, they modified their Bolshevik rhetoric and participated in antifascist alliances, worked for modest short-term successes within the fledgling CIO, and provided support and manpower for a diverse group of radical and progressive political movements and leaders, including Democrats, Farmer-Laborites, the American Labor Party in New York, and Communist Party councilmen in New York City, all under an essentially New Deal banner.^4
Organizers operating in the greater Philadelphia district had important trade-union successes and played a key role in organizing unemployed councils, electoral efforts, tenant rights, and peace, professional lobbying, civil liberties, ethnically based, and neighborhood groups. For a period of approximately ten years, from 1936 to perhaps 1947, the Communist Party of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, District Three, played an important if modest role in the political life of the area, generating ideas, programs, and visions that later became the commonplaces of social policy. The Party offered its membership several roles. One could remain at the rank-and-file level, become a cadre, or rise to functionary. One could engage in mass work within one of the Party fronts or a non-Party organization (e.g., the YMCA) or one could become a "colonizer," engaging in industrial organizing at the beck and call of the Party. In addition, one could work within the professional section, providing the Party with such services as legal counsel.^5
*/rank and file/* At the lowest level of Party membership were the rank and file, the proverbial "Jimmy Higginses" who worked within Party clubs and branches, paid their dues, went to a variety of meetings, and joined the mass organizations and fronts, often focusing on a specific issue like Spain, civil rights, or Scottsboro. Such rank-and-filers were at the heart of everyday activities and what Gornick calls "grinding ordinariness."^6
There was an extraordinary turnover among such members, who often became weary of meetings,/Daily Worker/solicitations, and office chores. Many rank-and-filers began their activism while in college or sometimes high school. The Philadelphia high school movement was quite sizable, including ASU and YCL chapters in at least eight schools. High school activists ranged throughout the city, meeting radical peers, socializing, and developing their own circle of comrades. For those who entered college either already active or about to be radicalized, there was an almost dizzying flow of activities, including demonstrations, marches, sit-downs, leaflettings, fundraisers, dances, parties, socials, lectures, speeches—and meetings. Always, there were meetings, one for every night of the week, often more.^7
Enthusiastic, recently converted Communists, like their spiritual children in the 1960s, had unbounded energy for political work. Most speak of being aroused and inspired by their sense of the significance of their efforts, the quality of their comrades, and the grandeur and power of their movement. Abe Shapiro recalls being engrossed at one time in the following activities: formal YCL meetings, ASU leadership, a universityantiwar council (of which he was director), Spanish civil war relief efforts, a variety of antifascist activities, a student-run bookstore cooperative, and support work for assorted civil liberties and civil rights causes. Some activists found schoolwork boring under the circumstances and devoted all of their time to politics. A few became "colonizers." In most cases, however, Communist students completed their degree work, and if they dropped out of school, it was often for financial reasons. For most, the excitement of campus politics held their attention and their interest. Some found Party youth work a path toward leadership, becoming citywide or national ASU or YCL leaders. Others on leaving campus became YCL branch or section organizers in different parts of the district. Many who did not attend college did neighborhood work with the YCL, often focusing their mass organizational efforts through the American League for Peace and Democracy. To many youthful rank-and-filers, "the YCL became . . . Marxist-Leninist theory all mixed up with baseball, screwing, dancing, selling the/Daily Worker/, bullsh-tting, and living the American-Jewish street life."^8
Certainly the first flush of radicalism, the emotional high of purposeful activity, the sense of accomplishment and of sacrifice for the good of humanity, the work with fine and noble comrades, the love affairs with those sharing a common vision, the expectation that the future was indeed theirs, created a honeymoon effect for most young Communists. For some, the fad of radicalism passed upon graduation or thereabouts. Others simply maintained a regular but distant "fellow-traveling" role as they entered the work world. And many were disillusioned by the Party's dogmatism or the great purge trials, the attacks on Trotsky, or the Non-Aggression Pact of 1939. Others, including those interviewed, remained in the Party. The shortest stay was six years, and most remained loyal for twenty years or more. For all of those who stayed, the Party and its small subculture became their lives. Those working at the branch, club, and section levels were rarely on the Party payroll and had to find work to supportthemselves. For single people problems were few and life could be lived at a double-time pace, working hard all day and then organizing and holding meetings every night. Some young Communists drifted for a time after school, doing Party work but not settling into anything. Ben Green lived in Strawberry Mansion, a lower-middle- and working-class Jewish neighborhood filled with Party people at the time. He did some work with the American League Against War and Fascism, spoke on street corners occasionally, went to three to four meetings a week, and helped to start a union local of public employees at his Works Progress Administration (WPA) office. He remembers that the Party "made it a big thing" when he shifted from the YCL to adult membership, but he was still looking at his future with uncertainty. Upon completing high school, George Paine felt that "sports were gone" from his life except for an occasional neighborhood basketball game. He kept in touch but saw less of old non-Party buddies and did standard political work, "hustling the paper," going to meetings, demonstrating. Finally he decided to go to college, suspending but not ending his Party ties. One rank-and-filer was a skilled craftsman, "glad of the class I was born into." He belonged to a conservative craft union and limited his political work to mass work at the local YMCA. He never really got involved with a club or branch group but paid his dues, subscribed to the paper, and worked with comrades to move the "Y" in a more "progressive" direction. He was quite open about his views, which would eventually get him into trouble at his job: "I felt that since to me everything was so clear, they'd hug me." Tim Palen, a farmer and skilled craftsman who lived in a rural suburb of Philadelphia, worked with the Farmers Union. A Party rank-and-filer, he helped farmers get low-interest loans through the union and sympathetic banks. Palen never involved himself with Party affairs in the city, and the highest office he held was dues secretary of his section. Since the Communist Party did not formally label members according to their rank, it is not always clear who was a rank-and-filer and who was considered cadre. One former district leader defines cadres as the people in training for leadership, like officers in an army. The rank and file are, therefore, foot soldiers, less involved and more a part of their own neighborhood or plant, more likely to hold conventional jobs, and more subject to pressures from neighbors, family, and changing circumstances. Annie Kriegel, who analyzes the French Communist Party as a set of concentric circles, places fellow travelers who vote for the Party and read the Sunday Party press on the "outer circle" and "ordinary party members" in the "first circle."^9
Many observers describe such rank-and-filers as less "Bolshevik"—that is, more likely to break Party discipline in everyday activity and closer to the behavior and sensibilities of their non-Party peers. Harvey Klehr puts it, "Many party members received no training of any kind, attendance at party meetings was often spotty, and members frequently ignored or failed to carry out assigned tasks."^10
Almond presents esoteric and exoteric models to distinguish rank-and-filer from cadre, suggesting that the Party daily press directed itself to the relatively idealistic and naive external members, while the Comintern, Cominform, and internal Party journals spoke to insiders and sophisticated activists.^11
*/cadre/* The cadre has a "personal commitment." He or she is a "true Bolshevik," internally Communized, with an almost priestly function and sense of specialness. The cadre is a "professional revolutionary" along Leninist lines.^12
Philip Selznick adds that cadres are "deployable personnel," available to the Party at all times.^13
Some observers use "cadre" interchangeably with "functionary," while others distinguish them. I interpret "functionary" as a more administrative and executive role, usually carrying more authority and generally associated with top district and national leadership.^14
Cadres were field workers, organizers, sometimes on the payroll but often holding a non-Party job. Some more mobile cadres lefttheir own neighborhoods, but most worked at least within their home districts. (Functionaries, on the other hand, could be homegrown and district-bound or at the service of the national, even international, office.) Many studies exaggerate the distinction between inner core and outer rings because of their dependence on the abstractions of Party tracts. Almond, for example, claims that the "true Communist" was beyond any commitment to the Popular Front since he was presumably fully Bolshevized and aware of the duplicity and tactical nature of moderated rhetoric. Perhaps this is true of the national leadership, who had associations with Moscow, training at the Lenin School, and Comintern experience. At the district level, however, the patterns are not as clear and seem to be more sensitive to generational, class, and ethnic variables.^15
Among informants, the word "cadre" connoted "hard-working," "brave," "dogged," and "honorable"—someone who followed a Leninist model of behavior; "functionary," on the other hand, was often used negatively to imply that someone was "bureaucratic," "aloof," "abstract," and "remote from struggle"—in brief, the Stalinist/apparatchik/. Neither necessarily belonged to an inner core. Fred Garst tells of the "process of indoctrination" he underwent as he entered into Party life, beginning with "the regularity of systematic participation"—dues, meetings, selling Party literature. He says that the number of meetings began slowly to escalate to three, sometimes five a week: section and subsection meetings, executive meetings, front meetings. Next, Garst was asked to lead a discussion, then to take responsibility for organizing the distribution of literature. He started taking classes at a local Workers School in Marxist theory and labor history. His commitment grew, his experience deepened, and he soon became a section leader. Some Philadelphia Communists moved from rank-and-file to cadre roles during important political campaigns like theProgressive Party efforts of 1947–1948. One woman had been serving in a minor capacity—"not anything earth-shattering"—but was swept up by what Wallace referred to as "Gideon's Army." She became a full-time Progressive Party organizer at a district level, her "first real organizing"; from that point on, she was fully involved in Party work at a variety of levels. Some cadres emphasized front and mass work, serving as leaders of IWO ethnic groups, youth groups, and defense groups. Such cadres were particularly likely to operate clandestinely, although many communicated their affilitation all but formally to constituents. Cadres can be distinguished by their level of operation (club, branch, section, or district), by their funding (on the payroll or holding a regular job), by their relative mobility and willingness to do political work outside their own milieu, and, finally, by the type of organizing they did (mass or front work, electoral party work, industrial organizing). The most prestigious cadres were those who did full-time industrial organizing at the will of the Party leadership. Such organizers, whether of working-class origins or not and whether indigenous or colonizers, were the heart of Party operations, seeking to develop a proletarian constituency and a trade-union base. /ny tisa/ ny Tisa's history shows what an experienced organizer could accomplish. Tisa, a second-generation son of illiterate, working-class peasants, went to work at the Campbell's Soup plant in his own South Camden "Little Italy" after completing high school in the early 1930s. While working summers at the plant, he had been stimulated by street-corner radical speakers and had joined the Socialist Party, which had a presence at Campbell's Soup. The Socialists sent him to Brookwood Labor College, where he met young Communists who impressed him with their earnestness and apparent lack of factionalism, a problem he encountered among the Socialists. He returned to help organize the plant, starting with a small group of about a half-dozen Italian workers, none of themCommunists, whom he molded through a discussion group. His group received a federal charter from the American Federation of Labor and began to develop an underground, dues-paying membership. Tisa tells of frustrating experiences within the conservative AFL. At the 1939 convention in Tampa, for example, he found himself accidently strolling into a local walk-out of Del Monte workers, just as the police were arresting the leader. He spoke to thery workers and was himself threatened with arrest. The workers exclaimed, "You got Bo [the arrested leader] but you're not gonna get him," and made a ring to escort Tisa to a streetcar. That evening, at his suggestion, there was a union meeting, packed and excited. When Tisa tried to speak about this remarkable experience at the AFL convention, he was refused the floor. Finally he simply took over the podium and microphone. Later that day, he met with other militants, including Communists, to organize the ClO-affiliated Food, Tobacco and Agricultural Workers Union. He took a detour, however, as events in Spain captured his energies and idealism. Tisa served two years in Spain with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, gaining "a sense of internationalism that never escapes you." On his return, he immediately set out to organize Campbell's Soup. At the time Tisa began to organize it, Campbell's Soup employed about 5,500 full-time workers, with another 5,000 part-timers who came in during the heavy season. At least half the workers were of Italian descent; there were few blacks until the late 1940s. About half the work force was female. There was a sexual division of labor based on physical strength. Tisa's organizing group consisted of eleven or twelve key workers, all leftists, mostly Italian. None were "colonizers." All were indigenous workers who, under Tisa's leadership, planned the unionization of Campbell's. Tisa recalls that the group would often go crabbing and then return to his home to eat, drink, and talk strategy. Tisa was the only member of the group on the national union's payroll; he made a bare ten or fifteen dollars a week. The organizers distributed themselves through the plant, reaching out to obvious sympathizers and picking up useful information that they would relay to Tisa, who could not enter the plant. He would take names and visit workers in their homes, signing them up so that the union could hold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election. He would also cull information about working conditions from his organizers and publish it in a union bulletin that they distributed clandestinely, each carrying five to ten copies. As their numbers increased, they became bolder and distributed the much discussed bulletin openly. Campbell's Soup had Tisa arrested once, but when he was released, many workers came to greet him. He assured them that the law permitted them to organize a union. The company tried many tactics to block his efforts: they started a company union; they charged that he was a "Red" and had raped nuns and killed priests in Spain. But Tisa lived in an Italian neighborhood among plant workers and had a mother who had worked in the plant for many years (cheering his speeches, often at the wrong times, he wryly and lovingly notes); he could not be red-baited easily. He was an open Communist; his neighbors would say, "ny's a Communist, but he's all right." Despite the real barrier of the workers'traditional Catholicism, he produced traditional trade-union benefits for members and was popular enough locally, a neighbor, to remain in leadership until the CIO purges of the late forties and early fifties finally forced him out. Tisa's experience highlights the importance of developing indigenous personnel in organizing activity. His efforts were certainly bolstered by support from the national union, by Communist Party training and aid, and by the relative benevolence of the federal government as expressed through the new NLRB. Yet the presence of local activists, something the Communist Party sought but did not often achieve, invariably made the task of organizing a plant or neighborhood that much easier. Other organizers performed similar roles without formally entering the Party, preferring to remain independent although generally taking positions consistent with Party policy. /jack ryan/ Jack Ryan's old man was "a union man," later a foreman, a local Democratic politician, and a bootlegger. As a teen-ager, and a high school drop-out, Ryan ran poker and crap games in the neighborhood with a group of friends, some of whom wound up in prison. He worked sporadically as a roofer, during which time he was influenced by a socialist "who couldn't read or write until he was twenty-three." His father finally got him a job at a local plant, where he worked as a crane operator in the early Depression years until he was laid off in 1931. Over the next two years, he tried a small store and "managed to hang on," selling water ice and running crap games. In 1933 he went back to the plant just at the point when the local union was being formed. Ryan recalls that he was "sworn in in an elevator with the lights out in between the floors." Despite his emerging radical politics, Ryan remained on the margins at first. "I deliberately didn't get active," he says, indicating that life seemed too unpredictable to take chances. In fact, he entered into a real-estate business on the side, and it eventually provided him with the cushion that allowed him to become more active within the plant. Initially he ran for the general committee, backed by the other crane operators because of his successful grievance work. Still cautious ("I kept my mouth shut," he notes), Ryan went along with the conservative local leadership while maintaining contact with the plant militants, several of whom were old Wobblies suspicious of any Communist Party leadership. Ryan worked primarily through his own crane operators' network within the plant. He played the trade-offs in union posts among the plant's crafts to become local president, an unpaid post, and finally business representative, the only salaried position within the local. Ryanremained close to the Party but never joined. "I was more radical than they were," he brags. He criticizes their twists and turns and suggests that "in the end you can't trust any of them" because of "the goddamn line." He adds that the/Daily Worker/was "written for a bunch of morons." On the other hand, Ryan admits that Party union members were often competent and successful organizers and that he agreed with most of their Popular Front stances, particularly their antifascism. On the Soviets, he says that he did not spend too much time thinking about them, but adds, "I don't blame them for having a treaty with the Germans." Ryan is clearly concerned with the practical issues of trade unionism. In describing one of his national officers, he exclaims, "A dedicated Communist but a helluva guy." He praises L. Lewis's efforts at industrial unionization: "him and the Commies put together the CIO; they were the smartest crowd." So Jack Ryan worked with but kept some distance from "the Commies": "they were a little bit nutty." His union was one of those expelled from the CIO in the late forties, and he remains bitter about the Party's role in the union's decline. He remained active, holding union office on and off until his retirement. Ryan proudly concludes that he was placed on Social Security while on strike for the last time in the early seventies. ny Tisa and Jack Ryan were working-class organizers, with roots in their ethnic communities, able to establish a rapport with their peers and, at the same time, develop more sophisticated skills within a broader and more ideological movement in or around the Communist Party. Their failures were mostly exogenous, the results of Taft-Hartley oaths, CIO purges, and McCarthyism in general. Others operated in less favorable terrain, without the decided advantages of an indigenous, working-class background. The most characteristic Party labor organizer was a young, educated, second-generation Jewish-American sent to "dig roots into the working-class." The efforts of such organizers were prodigious; their accomplishments, however, were more problematic. /al schwartz/ Al Schwartz's father was a 1905er, a Party organizer in the garment industry who had to open a small shop after he was blacklisted. Al, a classic "red-diaper baby," went through all of the Party developmental steps, from Young Pioneers through YCL to full Party involvement. Most of all he wanted to be a radical journalist. For a few years he was able to work on the Pennsylvania supplement to the/Worker/, but when it folded, his journalism career seemed over. Over the next half-dozen years, Schwartz, now in his late twenties, went into the shops as a "colonizer." He remembers the sense of adventure and mission he felt working at a few of the larger heavy industrial plants in the area. Yet he also speaks of his sense of loss and defeat in having to aban hopes of writing. Schwartz's response to colonizing was painfully ambivalent: a college graduate and a Jew, born and bred within the Yiddish-Left subculture, he both relished the contact with blue-collar workers and remained distant from them. They were not like him, he stresses; they were mired in back-breaking labor, poor educations, and plebian forms of leisure. For a time he enjoyed the camaraderie of the local taverns, but ultimately he was an outsider, a Jewish family man and a struggling intellectual. Schwartz most fondly recalls the hardness and fitness of his body, the feeling that he was young and strong and physically a worker. But the successes were few, and later the McCarthy period made such Party efforts even more marginal. Schwartz found himself a family man in his mid-thirties without a career or a profession; frustrated and drifting out of Party life without drama or flourish, he moved to reorganize his life. His political values held, but his colonizing days were over. /sol davis/ Sol Davis grew up in a poor, working-class, immigrant household. He was a bright young boy, and like many other upwardly aspiring Jewish males, he flourished at the elite Central High School andbegan moving toward a professional career. At this point, in the early years of the Depression, he was swept off his feet, as he puts it, by the Communist Party. After completing his schooling, he worked lackadaisically at his profession while seeking an opportunity to go into the shops as a Communist Party organizer; he was "determined to be shop worker." His first attempts allowed him to learn something about machinery, although in each instance he was fired for his inexperience and incompetence. Finally he caught on. "I was in my element," he asserts, describing the war years in heavy industry. For Davis, the good organizer had to have a commitment to "the principles of Communism," "a talent for leadership," and a willingness to listen. A confident speaker, whose words are clipped and terse, he worked twenty-nine years in the shops, twenty-six of them at one plant. Located within the city, the plant was staffed mostly by Catholic workers (Polish or Irish), initially few blacks, and even fewer Jews. Davis's recollections are filled with bitter refrains about red-baiting and "turn-coat ex-CPers," sell-outs and "social democrats." He is proud of his successes, which include chairing the grievance committee and serving as shop steward during most of his union years. Davis presents his life as devoted to organizing in the shops; he never got involved in his neighborhood and tended to leave Party electoral work to others. A hard-line orthodox Communist still, Davis argues that those who abandoned the Party were "petty-bourgeois with petty-bourgeois ideas," whereas he "was nursed out of the trade-union movement." In the fifties, he admits, "life became unpleasant," both in his largely Jewish lower-middle-class neighborhood and in the shop, where "a certain resistance developed to my activity" among people he calls anti-Communist socialists. Davis believes that most American workers have been bought off in "discrete and discernible fashion" by imperialist profits, manipulated by the mass media, and blinded by nationalism, religion, and racism. After spending almost thirty years in theindustrial heartland, Davis remains "dedicated to an idea," an "unquestioned belief" in communism. Yet when asked about his ability to convert workers to class consciousness, a saddened Sol Davis replies, "Never—the shop was a desert for me." He did not convert a single worker and was "in that respect an utter failure." The shops, to the stoical Davis, were "a cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland despite having made so many friends." Sol Davis has kept the faith since he was "baptized" in the movement; his singular lack of organizing success rests, in his mind, on factors beyond his control—repression, cowardice, self-interest. He is a confident man. / caldwell/ Other colonizers had more mixed results. Caldwell, a college graduate with a middle-class WASP heritage, recalls that in his initial colonizing effort, "I wasn't very smart and made a lot of stupid mistakes—talked to people, became known as a troublemaker." He was fired. Fortunately for Caldwell, his firing made him a "celebrated case," and the predominantly Irish and Italian Catholic workers, and even the conservative union officials, rallied to his support. Caldwell says that whereas other Party organizers had their best contact in their own departments, he touched bases throughout the plant and often socialized at the local bar to maintain and develop relationships. "A fair number knew I was a Communist," he says. "I never denied it." But most did not. In most plants to admit membership in the Party meant probable firing and certain harassment. For organizers like Caldwell, discretion was the rule. His efforts paid off against the union's local establishment. The national, a left-wing union, sent in an organizer to help fashion a local coalition to defeat the established group, and Caldwell worked with him as elections chairman. The progressive slate was successful. Caldwell, a leader of a left-wing veterans' group, participated in the 1946 strike surge. When mounted police chased people ontoporches in Southwest Philadelphia to break up injunction-defying demonstrations, the local CIO was able to bring out 25,000 workers to protest against police brutality in front of City Hall. But such Popular Front-style unified efforts were shattered by the developing Cold War consensus, which began to drive radicals, particularly Party members, out of the unions. Caldwell shifted jobs in this period, finally taking a full-time organizing job in a nearby industrial town. The plant had some IWO members and a few Party members, but no organization. Caldwell, who observes that "it really became difficult after the Korean War" started, found some success in putting out a small paper and handing it out at the main gates. He worked to develop contacts mainly by distributing the Party paper, first for free, then by subscription. Caldwell remembers proudly that he won a district drive with eighty subscriptions in his area. Gains were modest: a Hungarian sympathizer sent him two black shop stewards; then a few Irish Catholics made contact. Caldwell recalls going into Philadelphia to see prize fights with the latter workers, mixing pleasure with discussions of possible articles about their area for the Party press. But the times wrecked any chance Caldwell had of developing a Party group. The FBI scared off possible sympathizers; he was arrested for circulating antiwar petitions, and the venture finally ended in the heyday of the McCarthy period when Caldwell was sent to join the Party's underground. Caldwell and Al Schwartz experienced the ebb of the progressive union movement in the late forties and early fifties. Most Party labor organizers and colonizers, however, joined the fray during the extraordinary upsurge of the late thirties that established industrial unionism through the CIO. /milt goldberg/ Milt Goldberg, despite winning a Mayor's Scholarship, was unable to continue his education after graduating from Central High School. Instead, he scratched to make a living at odd jobs, gradually becoming interested in radical politics. While he wasworking a pre-Christmas job at Sears, the department store warehousemen went out on strike. Clerks refused to cross the picket lines. Goldberg recalls that the increasingly anxious owners persuaded the clerks to return to work with promises of improved conditions and wage increases that were never fulfilled; meanwhile, the warehousemen settled. In the aftermath, the strike leaders were all fired. Goldberg says that many of them were Communists and that he began to notice how often that was the case: "I respected the Party people; they were able, talented people." Goldberg became an organizer for a white-collar union dominated by mobsters who made deals with management at the expense of the membership. He describes his early efforts as "naive, inexperienced." Goldberg played a key role in leading his membership out of the corrupt union into a new CIO local, whose Philadelphia office staff was dominated by Party organizers. In those days, the late thirties, the era of sit-downs and a crescendo of collective bargaining agreements, organizing was remarkably fluid. Goldberg says that charters were granted easily and with little need for substantiation or the apparatus of negotiation soon to appear under the NLRB. In those days, he asserts with some nostalgia, one could go in and organize a place in one or two days, present demands to the employer, and make a deal. Such rapid victories were, of course, exceptions; Goldberg also recalls the often brutal resistance of management, particularly in heavy industry. After serving in the war, Goldberg returned to his union efforts, despite family advice that he try something more prestigious and lucrative. The union was his life, so he stayed. He never formally rejoined the Party, although he remained in close contact. The Taft-Harley anti-Communist oath soon reinforced this decision. Nevertheless, Goldberg and his small union were red-baited and constantly under McCarthyite attack. How did he survive? Goldberg argues that he "was very close to the membership" and had solid support from his fellow leaders. He emphasizes that the union provided real benefits and servicesto membership and sustained their loyalty despite the attacks. In addition, he notes that by this time the small union did not have a Party group, only him. One of the more damaging policies of Party-dominated unions was what Goldberg calls "the resolution bit"—the passing of Party-sponsored resolutions on every issue from Scottsboro to Spain. Too many left-wing unions manipulated such resolutions without making any effort to educate the membership; all that mattered was that local such-and-such of the so-and-so workers sent a resolution attacking Franco's dictatorship in Spain. Goldberg dropped such tactics in the postwar period, instead working with his local's officers and servicing the practical needs of the membership. By the mid-fifties, still a socialist, Milt Goldberg had become estranged from the Communist Party. As is true of most arts, the qualities that make for a successful organizer are uncertain and descriptions are inevitably cliche-ridden. As the experiences of ny Tisa and Jack Ryan indicate, having roots in the work force being organized gives one a decided advantage. But the Party could use only the troops it had available, and these were for the most part educated, urban, Jewish Americans, most of whom had no experience in the heavy industries that were their "colonies." Most of them experienced frustration; one cadre estimates that 95 percent of all Party colonizers failed. Too often colonizers were unable to operate in a sea of Gentile proletarians. Fred Garst, stillry at the Party for its insensitivity to context, charges that "the Left didn't have any organizing skills." But some organizers, remarkably, succeeded. /ike samuels/ Ike Samuels still speaks with an accent that reveals the years he spent in Eastern Europe before his mother, taking the remains of the family silver, arrived in the United States. No red-diaper baby, Samuels describes his youth as "street-wise" and his ambition as making it in America. Like many others, however, "the whole thing burst into flame" when the Depression forced him to dropout of school and hunger marches, bonus marches, and unemployed council protests acted on his emerging social conscience. Soon he was moving toward the Party and engaging in union organizing. Samuels, a gruff, self-deprecating man who often refers to his "big mouth," rose to leadership within a small craft union and served on the city CIO council. His CIO union was dominated by a Popular Front coalition of the Party and a progressive Catholic group. The union president, a leader of the latter, was incompetent; on several occasions Samuels had to bail him out of collective-bargaining disasters. Finally the Catholic faction and the Party faction sought to replace the president with Samuels. The national Party leadership, however, afraid of upsetting the delicate coalition, said no. Samuels recalls that he "didn't even question" the decision, but he was frustrated and soon left the union to become an organizer for a larger, industrial union. Samuels agrees with Milt Goldberg that it was relatively easy to be a good organizer in that period. Labor was in an upswing, workers were clamoring to be organized, NLRB cards were easy to accumulate. In heavy industry, Samuels stresses, the key was to seek out the pockets of old radical workers—not colonizers, he emphasizes—who had broken down the old ethnic barriers. Many such organizers were members of the IWO foreign-language federations. Next, one needed the "pie-cards," the full-time organizers supplied by the CIO itself, many of whom were veteran radicals. Along with and sometimes among the pie-cards were the younger Communists going into the shops, supported by a growing and confident Party organization. A "highly developed structure," Samuels recalls, was essential to organizing success. One had to develop shop committees and day-to-day contacts in each department. The sense of strength provided by the union itself and, crucially, by its CIO sponsor, allowed workers to imagine that the employers could be successfully challenged. In the automobile, steel, rubber, mining, and electrical equipment industries, workers facedmammoth corporations willing to use any means necessary to throw back the unionist surge. The New Deal, by encouraging a more neutral judiciary and law enforcement role, made it easier for the coordinated CIO drives to gain concessions from corporate heads. Samuels suggests that the workers, some of whom had backed decades of unsuccessful rank-and-file efforts, needed the sense that they were a part of a powerful coalition. L. Lewis appealed to this sense when he proclaimed, "The President want you to join a union." Such a coalition advanced unionization at the same time that it necessitated concessions and strictures that limited the leverage of the newly legitimized unions.^16
Samuels argues that it was imperative for organizers to have knowledge of their industries. He deliberately worked in a craft shop to learn the trade and later carefully studied one heavy industry before going out to organize its workers. He was not typical. Hodee Edwards, a thirties organizer, stresses "our consistent failure to investigate the neighborhoods and factories where we tried to work, thus applying a generalized, sectarian plan usually incomprehensible to those we wanted to reach."^17
And Sam Katz suggests that the Party did not always recognize the tension between the leadership and the activist/organizer over the pace and nature of organizing. The functionaries often pushed for the most advanced positions, including the "resolutions bit," whereas the organizers focused on the issues that confronted their constituents. Conflict was inevitable between broad policy and local needs and variations, and between policy planners and functionaries and field organizers and the rank and file. It is clear that the Communist Party suffered chronically from top-heavy decision making, which often left local organizers and members with policy directives that made little sense in local circumstances. In addition to organizational strength and preparation, Samuels feels that leadership ability and, at times, personal courage must be demonstrated. On several occasions he had to take risks or lose the confidence of his membership. In one local the workers affectionately referred to him as "R.R.J.B.," Red Russian JewBastard. He tells of organizing workers in a small Georgia company town. Fifteen hundred were on strike, and the patriarchal owners were negotiating only under pressure from the NLRB. They were stalling, however, so Samuels called on the work force to increase the pressure by massing outside the building where the negotiations were taking place. The next day, in the midst of bargaining, Samuels noticed the face of the company's attorney turning an ash white as he glanced out the window. What he saw were about three hundred workers marching toward the building carrying a rope; lynching was on their agenda. Samuels went out and calmed them down, "modified" their demands, and then wrapped up negotiations. His early organizing days also included maritime struggles with gangster elements who were not beyond "bumping off" militants. Samuels implies that the Left elements fought back, sometimes resorting to their own brand of physical intimidation.^18
Peggy Dennis describes the Bolshevik ideal as "soldiers in a revolutionary army at permanent war with a powerful class enemy." And "in permanent war, doubts or questions are treason."^19
Yet as Joseph Starobin asks, "How could the Leninist equilibrium be sustained in a country so different from Lenin's?"^20
In fact, it was sustained unevenly and at a price. In a society with a tradition of civil liberties (albeit inconsistently applied and occasionally suspended in moments of stress) and a remarkably resilient political democracy, the Leninist model, hardened and distorted by Stalinism, mixed uncomfortably with American realities.^21
At its best the Leninist ideal encouraged the incredible levels of hard work and perseverance that even critics of Communism grant to its cadres; it also evoked such personal qualities as integrity, courage, honesty, and militancy. Yet the ideal seemed to degenerate too easily into a model of behavior appropriately labeled Stalinist. Communist cadres accepted deceptive tactics and strategies that inevitably backfired and undermined theirintegrity and reputations—for example, the front groups that "flip-flopped" at Party command after years of denying Party domination. The intolerance and viciousness with which Communists often attacked adversaries, including liberals, socialists, and their own heretics, remains inexcusable.^22
As organizers, Communist activists suffered from a tendency toward a special kind of elitism that often made them incapable of working with diverse groups sharing common goals. In some periods they turned this streak of inhumanity against themselves, engaging in ugly campaigns of smear and character assassination to eliminate "Titoists," "Browderites," "revisionists," "left-wing adventurists," or "white chauvinists." Moreover, the secrecy within which Communists often operated, while sometimes justified by the danger of job loss or prosecution, served to undermine the Party's moral legitimacy. An organizer's relationship with his constituents depends on their belief in his integrity, and this is especially true when the organizer is an outsider. Too often, Communists undermined their own integrity by covering manipulative and cynical acts with the quite plausible explanation that survival required secrecy. The tendency of Communists to resort to First and Fifth Amendment protection during the McCarthy period falls under similar challenges. As Joseph Starobin asks: Should left-wingers and Communists have gone to jail in large numbers? Might they have been better off/politically/, in terms of their/image/, to assert their affiliations, to proclaim them instead of asserting their right to keep them private, to explain the issues as they saw them, and to take the consequences?^23
Communist activists certainly did not lack courage or commitment to a protracted struggle. Many risked prison, and some served prison sentences; perhaps as many as one-third of the cadres painfully accepted assignments to go underground in the early fifties. Their Leninism had to navigate contradictory currents of Stalinism and Americanization, militancy and opportunism. Local Communist activists often lived a somewhat schizophrenic life, alternately internationalist and indigenous, Bolshevik and "progressive," admiring the Leninist model of cadre and yet falling into more settled, familial patterns of activism. There was a clear if often ignored sexual division of labor: men were more likely to be the cadres, women performed auxiliary clerical functions and unnoticed but essential neighborhood organizing. The Party was also divided between theorists and intellectuals on the one hand and field workers and activists on the other. As one field worker proclaimed, "I couldn't be spending hours on ideological conflicts; I'm an activist, not an intellectual." Many agree that the bulk of an organizer's time went into local actions and much less went into discussions and considerations of important theoretical or programmatic matters.^24
Only a small proportion received the type of ideological and intellectual training suggested by the Leninist ideal, an ideal that formally sought the obliteration of the distinctions between thought and action, intellectual and activist. In fact, Party intellectuals faced chronic and ingrained suspicion, even contempt, from Party leaders. Abe Shapiro sardonically charges that the function of Party intellectuals was "to sell the/Daily Worker/at the waterfront." He remembers checking on a new Party document on the economy: "I actually read the document. I wanted to know what the Hell it was." He found it infantile and far below what well-trained but never used Party intellectuals and social scientists could have produced. The Party rarely, except for showcase purposes, relied on its trained intellectual or academic members; instead, it called on Party functionaries, often of very narrow training, to write about complex sociological, economic, and scientific matters. Theory suffered as a result, and the Party, particularly after 1939, included very few intellectuals. Until the mid-fifties crisis, the Party, strangled by Stalinist dogma and intolerance, was closed to intellectual discourse. Abe Shapiro finally left the Party because his intellectual training hadgiven him a commitment to intellectual honesty that he could not shake. Among organizers, Party arrogance cut off messages from the grass roots. Orders from what one veteran calls "the Cave of Winds"—Party headquarters in New York—often contradicted practical organizing experience. The Party also suffered from insularity. Mark Greenly brought interested fellow workers to a Party-dominated union meeting. They were curious and "antiboss" but quite unsophisticated and not at all ready to make any commitments. Unfortunately, the Party organizer immediately started to discuss class struggle and a variety of abstract political matters. The workers were quickly alienated and frightened away, never to return. Ethel Paine recalls such "inappropriate behavior" as the sectarian conversations Party people would carry on in the presence of non-Communist acquaintances and neighbors. Although chronically secretive about membership, Communists could be remarkably insensitive to their audience in revealing ways. A successful organizer learned when and how to introduce more controversial ideas to nonmembers. Training, including the Party schools, helped to some extent, but most Communists agree with the veteran organizer who feels that such learning has to be done on the job, by trial and error. Many Communists, like Sam Katz and Caldwell, tell painful if sometimes hilarious tales of their own and others' ineptitude as beginning organizers. Some discovered that they simply were not suited for the job and would never develop the personal qualities that make for a competent organizer. Several veterans insist that organizers are born, not made. Yet relatively introverted and socially awkward young people, inspired by the idealism and the comradeship of the Communist movement, did transform themselves into effective organizers. Vivian Gornick points out that such transformations did not always survive the collapse of association with the Party.^25
I did not, however, discover total or near total personality changes caused either by joining or abandoning the Party. Although most of the literature about radical organizers deals with men, it is increasingly apparent that some of the mostsignificant and consistently ignored organizing within the Communist Party involved women. The ten women interviewed performed a rich variety of Party tasks, but perhaps the most important were those not officially designated, like the informal neighborhood activities organized by Edith Samuels, described inChapter Five . Sarah Levy was also involved in such efforts. Sarah and her two children joined her colonizer husband, Moe, in leaving the comfortable Party concentration in the Strawberry Mansion section to live in a nearby industrial town. She refers to the next three and a half years as "not the easiest times and, yet to me, personally, one of the best growing experiences—and I have never regretted it." (Moe's wry rejoinder was "She didn't have to work the blast furnaces.") There were only three Party families in the town, quite a difference from the thirty or forty Party friends they left behind in Strawberry Mansion. While Moe worked the furnaces and tried to develop contacts with plant workers, Sarah joined a folk dance group at the local "Y," where she got to know Greek, Yugoslav, Italian, and other immigrant women. Moe, limited in the plant to a small Party circle of colonizers and sympathizers, was able to socialize with the husbands of Sarah's folk dancing partners. Colonizers often ended up working with a local Party apparatus while their wives, working through neighborhood networks, reached into the community through its women, older people, and children. Asie Repice casually but proudly concluded about her work with a community center during the war years; "I am an organizer, so I organized a nursery." Her husband was in the service. Moving around to stay close to his base, she put her organizing abilities and political values to work. Such efforts remain an unwritten chapter in the history of radical organizing.^26
*/functionaries/* Few district functionaries other than Sam Darcy achieved any national stature or had much leverage outside the district. Dave Davis, the business manager of UE Local 155 and an importantPhiladelphia-area labor leader, was often elected to the Party's national committee but never entered the inner decision-making group. Other district leaders—like Pat Toohey, Phil Bart, Phil Frankfeld, and Ed Strong—were D.O.s sent into the district and then moved out again to other assignments. Most district functionaries played dominant roles within the district committee and ran such important Party operations as the local Progressive Party and the Civil Rights Congress. They drew meager salaries, which were sometimes supplemented by Party-related employment. The Party network, at least during the late thirties and forties, could place members in some union jobs.^27
Possibly several dozen members depended on the Party for their livelihood in this way. */nonmembers/* One often encounters Communists who, for very specific reasons, were not formal Party members. One former Progressive Party leader never joined the Party but worked closely with district Communist leaders to map strategy and coordinate activity. Some union leaders stayed out of the Party to deny employers the red-baiting weapon, and a number dropped out after the Taft-Hartley Act made a union officer liable to prosecution for perjury if he lied about current Party membership.^28
*/professionals/* Some professionals who joined the Party operated at a rank-and-file level, belonging to a professional branch or club, attending meetings, and fulfilling subscription quotas. Several recall being highly impressed with the other professionals they met at Party functions. But such members—often doctors, dentists, and architects—were on the margins of Party life. Many professionals, especially lawyers associated with Party causes, found membership problematic and chose not to formalize their relationships with the Party, though they might be members of a professional club. "I fought against loose tongues," one states."I never asked a soul whether they were Communists or not." Several left-wing attorneys stress that they did not want to be in a position to betray anyone or risk a perjury charge if questioned about their own affiliations and associations. The law in America is a conservative profession, and several Left lawyers paid a high price for their efforts.^29
Another consideration was that the Party sometimes pressured lawyers to use a particular legal strategy in Party-related cases, and such pressure was more effectively applied to members.^30
One attorney notes that the Party itself seemed ambivalent about requiring formal membership. A few district leaders pressured him to join, while others understood that it was not particularly useful or necessary. Some lawyers, whether members or not, found their services very much in demand. They were needed in labor negotiations, electoral activities, and civil rights and civil liberties cases. In the late forties and early fifties, Party-affiliated lawyers found it less easy than it had been to earn a living through Party-based clients, such as left-wing unions. Instead they were called upon to deal with the titanic task of defending Party members indicted under the Smith Act and other pieces of repressive legislation. Thanks to this demand, as one attorney suggests, they received special treatment from the district leadership. They mixed with labor leaders, politicians, judges, and, at times, the national Party leadership. Several had more contact with the non-Communist local authorities than district functionaries had. One left-wing attorney recalls that he had the luxury of criticizing Party policies and decisions, within limits, because "I was needed, I was special, a lawyer." More significant than membership was the degree of autonomy a member had, and this was based on his importance to the Party or his institutional leverage. A professional could get away with criticism of the Nazi-Soviet Pact that would not be tolerated from rank-and-filers or most cadres. A union leader could ignore Party instructions, aware that his own organization was his power base. A former Communist, George Charney, criticizes in his memoirsthe "left-wing aristocracy of labor that rarely mingled with the herd of party members or the middle functionaries."^31
Such trade-unions "influentials" often had contempt for functionaries and would go over their heads to top leadership. Those who entered the Party, at whatever level, in whatever role, operated within a well-defined organization and lived within a somewhat insular and often nurturing subculture that provided them with formal and informal relationships. These relationships eased the often lonely organizing work. One veteran unashamedly calls his fellow Communist organizers "the most dedicated, most selfless people in the struggle." Many would share Jessica Mitford's feelings: I had regarded joining the Party as one of the most important decisions of my adult life. I loved and admired the people in it, and was more than willing to accept the leadership of those far more experienced than I. Furthermore, the principle of democratic centralism seemed to me essential to the functioning of a revolutionary organization in a hostile world.^32
Any tendency to romanticize such activists must be tempered by an awareness of their mistakes, limitations, and weaknesses, and it is true that many non-Communists made similar commitments to organizing the oppressed and the weak. They too merit consideration. These Philadelphia veterans of the Communist Party are very human actors who worked on a particular historical stage. Some conclude that their years of effort never really brought any of their factory and shop constituents into the movement. Like Sol Davis, they admit that they were utter failures in that "cultural, political, and philosophical wasteland" of blue-collar America. Others share the pride, perhaps the arrogance, of one of Vivian Gornick's subjects: We're everywhere, everywhere. We/saved/this f--king country. We went to Spain, and because we did America understood fascism. We made Vietnam come to an end, we're in there inWatergate. We built the CIO, we got Roosevelt elected, we started black civil rights, we forced this sh-tty country into every piece of action and legislation it has ever taken. We did the dirty work and the Labor and Capital establishments got the rewards. The Party helped make democracy work.^33
The road from Spain to Watergate is a long one. Communists, euphoric at their prospects in the heyday of CIO sit-downs and Popular Front triumphs, later needed remarkable inner resources to sustain political activity. They sensed the first tremors from the purge trials, received a severe jolt from the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, and in the postwar years faced first political repression and then, more painfully, internal disintegration and demoralization. NEXT CHAPTER seven: problems and crises, 1939–1956 Trump Claims He Could Easily Be Israeli PMby bill - 2022-10-19 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Trump is a moron "Former US President Donald Trump stated today that he is so popular in Israel, that he could easily be the Prime Minister there. Who's More in Lockstep, Republicans with Trump or Democrats with Biden?by bill - 2022-10-20 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Neither. Most of us realize our (mis)leaders are idiots. "There was an extraordinary Senate debate this week in Orem, Utah, between Sen. Mike Lee and challenger Evan McMullin. It was extraordinary in part because McMullin, who is running as an independent and says that if elected he will not caucus with either Democrats or Republicans, agreed with Lee in many policy areas, like federal spending and regulatory overreach. "I think our difference is in approach," McMullin said at one point..." Kevin McCarthy: We're Not Going to Impeach Joe Bidenby bill - 2022-10-22 ( education / news / politics ) [html version][Updated: 2023-01-11 21:14:31]If anyone has EVER deserved impeachment, it's Joe Biden . UPDATE: But now we know why the establishment was insistent on McCarthy being named Speaker. "Weak GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy spoke with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures back in April 2022 from Poland. The Republican House leader called for arming Ukraine with billions in US taxpayer dollars. Kevin McCarthy then discussed the GOP plan if the take control of Congress..." Hunter Biden for President in 2024by bill - 2022-10-26 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good article! "Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable, the art of the next best." -- Otto von Bismarck 30 US Senators are Marxistsby doug - 2022-10-26 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Excellent interview about how deep Marxism has infiltrated America. Includes a new book. And the author will have something similar about the House of Representatives. Many names given. He also has a book about church leaders going woke which means they're Marxists. https://www.bitchute.com/video/nksLGPyeYS1e/ Thirty U.S. Senators are Marxistsby staff - 2022-10-27 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Excellent interview about how deep Marxism has infiltrated America. Includes a new book. And the author will have something similar about the House of Representatives. Many names given. He also has a book about church leaders going woke which means they're Marxists. Election/Selection in Brazilby don - 2022-11-04 ( education / news / politics / fraud ) [html version]Today's selection results in Brazil are being called into question. Shades of 2020 have hit again?!! Let's hope the criminals in this scam don't get away with this. FYI, Bolsonaro was questioning the vax, so allegedly "not fit for the job." Puppet he was not, so the globalists decided he must go (election scammed out). Read, listen or watch the rest here: Watch on BitChute Australian in Brazil says: "Not the slightest possibility it was legit, I would not call it an 'election.' About the video linked herein, Australian says... "The Bitchute guy was accurate except on one detail. Bolsonaro has not announced he is asking for a military audit of the election. The military is already doing that without him asking. If the military decides it is proven fake, they can legally remove the Supreme Court. Senator Says Free Speech Doesn't Protect Misinformation that Downplays Political Violenceby bill - 2022-11-04 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]You mean, like mainstream media calling left-wing rioters mostly peaceful? "The statement itself is misinformation..." My Voting Process, FYIby bill - 2022-11-11 ( education / civics / politics / voting ) [html version]In my voting district in Williamson County, Tennessee, you show an approved state-issued photo ID; get a long, blank piece of paper; the helper person does something that tells the touch-screen computer/voting system (didn't notice the maker) which specific ballot should show up on the screen; you insert your piece of paper; make your choices (preferably, anyone but a Democrat); it prints out your choices onto that piece of paper; you take that to another machine manned by another helper; and, finally, insert it into that tabulating machine. It's a combination of paper and electronic, so cheating can still happen on the electronic end, unfortunately. Biden Regime Won't Say If They Will Try to Shut Twitter Down for Posts It Doesn't Likeby bill - 2022-12-02 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]They'll ask China what THEY would do. "White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Wednesday refused to answer when asked if the Biden Regime will try to shut Twitter down for posts it doesn't like. The Biden Regime this week said they are monitoring Twitter after Elon Musk promised to allow free speech. WATCH: The..." Tulsi Gabbard Shows Her True Colorsby doug - 2022-12-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]She's saying what supporters want to hear but trying to do something very bad -- chip away at the 2nd amendment. W.H.O. Tightens Screws of Global Medical Dictatorshipby staff - 2022-12-07 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ https://www.brighteon.com/embed/4690d7cd-64f5-4467-b3ce-8457f43cf5c4/ On 12/6/22 01:14: This explains how it's happening and how to fight it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuEctFEspuPQ/ Evangelical Christian Dr. Francis Collins and Advisor to President Biden Says 300,000 People Have Died Due to Covid Shot Misinformationby bill - 2022-12-09 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Contrary information is not always misinformation Dr. Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Anthony Fauci's boss, is now the current science advisor to President Biden. In an interview with Shannon Firth published on MedPage Today, Collins stated that: An estimated300,000 people died because..." Ari Emanuel: Blacks Must Reject Divisive Politics and Unite with Jews Against Whitesby bill - 2022-12-11 ( education / news / rss ) [html version]That'd just be MORE divisive politics. "Hollywood big wig Ari Emanuel, who together with the Anti-Defamation League led the charge to cancel Kanye Ye West, wrote a column on Friday calling on Blacks to reject the virus of antisemitism and hate and division and instead unite with Jews..." Jimmy John's Founder GOES OFF on Democrats and Criminal Deep State Attacks on Trumpby bill - 2023-01-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Jimmy John's founder used to kill elephants for fun. "Jimmy John's restaurant chain founder Jimmy John Liautaud spoke with Breitbart News recently at TPUSA's annual AmericaFest in Phoenix, Arizona. Liautaud, who Liautaud founded his famous sandwich chain at age 19 with a $25,000 loan from his father. was a major Trump donor in the 2020..." Lara Logan on Fireby staff - 2023-01-10 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Wow, she is great. This interview gets very deep. She's so good at clearly articulating her thoughts. Don't miss this one. In case you don't know, she became famous as a correspondent on 60 Minutes, which used to be the cutting edge of TV reporting for decades. Then she worked at several other mainstream news outfits. She tells it like she sees it and it could challenge your belief system, but that's a good thing. Here's what Google says about her: "Logan has been honored with nearly every top award in the industry, including multiple Emmys, Edward R. Murrow Awards, the Overseas Press Club Award, and the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Award, widely considered broadcast journalism's equivalent of the Pulitzer.Apr 9, 2019" With credentials like that, you might think she's a media darling. But she's now hated. So what went wrong?! Here's part 2 where she describes what's wrong with journalism today: Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2023 8:48 AM Congressman Byron Donalds Reveals Impeaching Biden is on the Tableby bill - 2023-01-11 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Here's hoping! "Looks like the ultimate form of accountability, impeaching Joe Biden, may happen after all. Congressman Byron Donalds (R-FL) told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo Sunday morning that he would support impeaching Biden if the House investigations into Biden and his Regime found..." New Church Committeeby staff - 2023-01-12 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Sometimes I wonder about this authoer, Cliff Kincaid but here's a link to his article anyhow: Is Document-Gate a Democrat Effort to Kneecap Biden's Re-Election Plans?by bill - 2023-01-14 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Even they are tired of this bumbling fool. "As weve reported, classified documents keep popping up in President Joe Bidens think tank, his garage, and now the personal library at his residence and suddenly the president is in potentially big trouble, both legally and politically. Thursday afternoon Attorney General Merrick Garland announced the appointment of Robert Hur as special prosecutor to investigate the ..." Who Planted the Biden Documents?by bill - 2023-01-17 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]It was his butler, in the conservatory, with the candlestick! "The question of discovery, or timing, is more important than who planted them, since they were discovered as Biden was about to launch a 2024 election bid and was already the subject of a progressive push to step down from the race. This is just too coincidental...." MLK was a Marxistby staff - 2023-01-18 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Very interesting discussion https://www.bitchute.com/video/s11CIQ9ALLc/ Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 9:35 PM I thought that MLK was a conservative where is info that he was a marxist? On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 09:20:56 PM PST:
Just learned that. Interesting that the USA celebrates at the national level such a person. But since the modern Democrat party leans that direction (if not open Communist), it sure fits nicely in today's politics. Lara Trump: Looks Like Somebody at Top Said 'We're Done with Biden'by bill - 2023-01-18 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Great, but they'll just find a younger idiot to take his place. "Click here to join the Association of Mature American Citizens a group 2 million strong fighting for our freedom. Lara Trump, the daughter-in-law of former President Trump, told the Todd Starnes Show audience President Biden and the media hypocritically accused Trump of doing what Biden had done all along. He knew those documents ..." Delusional Trumpby staff - 2023-01-22 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]but millions of others fell for it, too: "Fear of Freedom" Videoby staff - 2023-01-24 ( education / news / politics / movies-tv-video ) [html version]Yeah, this just amazes me but so many seem to prefer the lack of freedom under socialism/communismTHE FEAR OF FREEDOM THE FEAR OF FREEDOM Why is freedom hated and feared by so many in the world today? Why are there so many advocates for totalitariani... Thomas Sowell Quoteby admin - 2023-02-01 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]-- Thomas Sowell A Message to Germansby doug - 2023-02-14 ( education / research / politics / europe ) [html version]Share with anyone in Germany or with German ancestry or just interested in it. From Gonzalo Lira, a Chilean American of Chilean German descent, living in Ukraine. Seymour Hersh referenced this article: how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream Geo Politics and Pyramidsby steve - 2023-02-28 ( education / research / emails / conspiracies ) [html version]'pyramid a weapon"? geez, that said right away makes me figure the video is questionablethen again, I've questioned if Farrell ever was anything bu a useful idiot On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 09:21:56 PM PST:
Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 They're discussing interesting theories that are rarely mentioned but fascinating and very ancient.
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 9:55 AM ; a couple chuckeleheads you don't need evidence if you laugh loudly enough after everything you say On 2/26/23 23:21: nk Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 They're discussing interesting theories that are rarely mentioned but fascinating and very ancient.
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 9:55 AM ; Re: a couple chuckeleheads you don't need evidence if you laugh loudly enough after everything you say On 2/26/23 23:21: nk Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 They're discussing interesting theories that are rarely mentioned but fascinating and very ancient.
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 9:55 AM ; Re: a couple chuckeleheads you don't need evidence if you laugh loudly enough after everything you say On 2/26/23 23:21: nk Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 They're discussing interesting theories that are rarely mentioned but fascinating and very ancient.
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 9:55 AM ; Re: a couple chuckeleheads you don't need evidence if you laugh loudly enough after everything you say On 2/26/23 23:21: nk Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 a couple chuckeleheads you don't need evidence if you laugh loudly enough after everything you say On 2/26/23 23:21: nk Very interesting discussion by Joseph Farrell. https://youtu.be/YWoeniSKm80 Trump's Call for 'Freedom Cities' Plays Right into Globalists' Plan for Control Gridby bill - 2023-03-08 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Trump's a useful idiot. And, if there's a catch phrase like "freedom cities," you know it's b.s. "March 6, 2023 For several years now, myself and others with an eye toward the future have been warning people to get out of the cities or risk becoming a ward of the burgeoning technocratic beast system. Through their smart city technology and various engineered emergencies, the globalists hope to lure us into stack and … Continue reading Trump's call for building Freedom Cities plays right into globalists' plan for Fourth Industrial Revolution control grid..." Canadian Politicsby doug - 2023-03-15 ( education / news / emails / conspiracies ) [html version]It's the first I heard of that term.
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 10:58 AM -- yeah, as Whitney Webb said in her two books "one nation under blackmail" volumes 1 & 2. the mafia gets BILLIONS of dollars through drugs and human trafficking (which Clinton and the CIA were caught doing, which led to the term "Arkancide") On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 10:52:31 AM : Very interesting information by a former 15 year member of politics there. It's a mafia system. Utterly controlled and corrupt. He says it's the same in every country. https://www.bitchute.com/video/TeSUMrcuXXFJ/ Biden's Destructive Russia Sanctions Are Destroying Decades-Long Dominance of Dollar as World's Reserve Currencyby bill - 2023-04-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]All part of the great reset whose goal all along was to destroy U.S. dominance. "Former Defense Secretary Roberts Gates has famously said on more than one occasion that though he liked Joe Biden personally, Biden has been wrong on every major foreign policy issue throughout his entire half-century political career. And he and his handlers are handling the war between Russia and Ukraine exactly the wrong way as well. ..." Desantis a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?by doug - 2023-04-16 ( education / news / politics / american ) [html version][I] just read it. Basically, DeSantis is condemned [for] enjoying watching the torture of inmates at Guantanamo while in the Navy. Sounds believable, but ... I bet he's better than pedo joe. Kamala and Many of Biden's Folks Were Not Lawfully Appointedby doug - 2023-04-18 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Ask them for their signed and notorized oath of office. Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 10:41 AM Kamala and many of Biden's folks are NOT LAWFULLY appointed I'm wondering if the local politicians (mayor and leftist congressman) are legal. I need to watch the video again to see what particular document to ask to see. (is gavin legal?) On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 10:00:04 AM : I considered sharing this video when I saw it. Maybe I did. It's a very interesting situation. The biggest question is whether any court will care and do what's right. But if they don't then our banana republic is even more obvious to people still very naive to our political disaster we have already. Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 9:50 AM Kamala and many of Biden's folks are NOT LAWFULLY appointed BREAKING: SMOKING GUN PROOF OF BIDEN'S TREASON? -- Todd Callender BREAKING: SMOKING GUN PROOF OF BIDEN'S TREASON? -- Todd Callender Protect Your Retirement W/ A Gold. IRA https://www.sgtreportgold.com/ Noble Gold is Who I Trust == Attorne... Restrict Actby doug - 2023-04-25 ( education / civics / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]Of course, people won't investigate it, figuring it's just to "protect our kids" from TikTok and not look at the video. On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 10:08:52 AM : If you have not yet heard of it, watch this power grab proposed legislation. It's misleadingly nicknamed the TikTok Restrict Act. It's similar to the Patriot Act but far worse. How does this proposed protect freedoms of Americans? It gives incredible powers to unelected people we never should give any power. And who is supporting it? In this case it's left and right who've been lobbied, so they're taking money. Both sides are criminal and corrupt. But with our current administration we see countless examples the push for destruction of America coming from the left because it's obvious they can't stand freedom of anyone who has a different opinion about anything. They claim the exact opposite, of course. That's the insanity of their satanic actions. They're brainwashed and will never allow an open debate because then a different viewpoint would be revealed and people will see it's logical and the left will lose control. If we actually had free speech and they don't censor or attack someone financially or imprison someone, they'd allow and welcome alternative media which is the ONLY place free speech still exists. But it must be crushed because then they can't control the people who want to be left alone. Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 1:04 AM You may have been hearing about this senate proposed recently. But I really doubt it was mentioned on TV since that would be actual reporting. This video has many comments about what it would mean if passed, maybe wiping out crypto and ramping up the police state we are seeing more and more. It would outlaw "wrong think" -- any objections to what the criminals in government are doing. It appears to amplify the police state powers far beyond what the Patriot Act did to us after 9/11. As far as I can tell, it has very little to do with TikTok. Sounds good? School District Approves Curriculum Accusing Israel of Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimesby bill - 2023-04-30 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good, so long as it shows both sides' crimes. "A California school district board voted to approve two new ethnic studies courses this week that would teach high school students that Israel has committed war crimes and ethnically cleansed Palestinians, according to the curriculum...." Trump's Attacks on DeSantis Are Insaneby bill - 2023-05-02 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Larry Elder, Desantis and RFK Jr. are better alternatives. "Attempting to define our problem as a nation, President Trump was right on target, telling Greg Kelly of Newsmax, There's a little group, a small group of people that are very smart, very radical left, probably Marxists, and they're running our country into the ground..." Biden Renews Funding of Wuhan Instituteby bill - 2023-05-13 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Because he misses 2020-21?
RFK Jr Wants to Ban Fertilizerby bill - 2023-05-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Misleading headline. He actually says, "...we can't just ban fertilizers..." "It is not as if the Democratic Party offers no alternative to the corrupt and senile Joe Biden, who is so beholden to radical leftists that he is trying to price electricity beyond the reach of normal Americans. Their next most popular 2024 candidate, Robert Kennedy, is polling at 19% among Democrat primary voters..." Absolutely Terrific Ukraine Articleby doug - 2023-05-23 ( education / civics / politics / war ) [html version]By the famous Martin Armstrong. He speaks so much truth that the criminal Zelensky has threatened his life. There is so much information packed into this article that you may want to take your time to absorb it. Zelensky is desperate to start WW 3 and is begging for money from everyone. why-ukraine-must-lose-to-save-the-world On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 10:00:50 AM : I'll watch it later since Armstrong has LOTS of good info but Zelensky doesn't care about WWIII. He just cares about getting idiots like Biden to send BILLIONS to the Ukraine so he and Biden can siphon off part of it. (It's their demonic puppeteers who hate humanity and want a techie Transhuman world with slaves to tend to the real work who want to destroy the rest of humanity with WWIII.) 2nd Amendment in Tennesseeby doug - 2023-06-11 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Happened in Franklin county. Might find it interesting. Who is in Control?by steve - 2023-06-12 ( education / research / conspiracies / politics ) [html version]Excellent. I didn't know he's running for president. And I stopped watching him after I got off Fascistbook and YouTube where he seems to spend most of his time. Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 9:27 AMwho is in Kontrol Dr SHIVA Exposes The System of the Elites -- HOW the Few Control the Many -- What WE Do to Break Free Dr SHIVA Exposes The System of the Elites -- HOW the Few Control the Many European Unionby doug - 2023-06-15 ( education / civics / politics / europe ) [html version]This is a great explanation of the background of the EU. Gets into the history and symbolism it uses. It's important to understand. https://www.bitchute.com/video/Fdu6e4BpQ3OM/ War is Good for Businessby doug - 2023-06-23 ( education / civics / politics / war ) [html version]And in case that's a surprise to you, ever wonder who controls politicians or how much money it takes to buy a senator? OMG's new undercover recording includes this and way more. James O'Keefe is back and letting criminals describe their own crimes. BlackRock Recruiter Who Decides People's Fate Says War is Good for Business Russian Civil War?by steve - 2023-06-26 ( education / civics / politics / war ) [html version]I read opposite things about the "war", but I figure the one from leftist Yahoo "news" is the wrong one: Anyhow, here's a related article that I'm NOT bothering to read: Epoch Times On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:45:42 AM : Of course, whatever the gaslight media is saying about this is propaganda. Scott Ritter is someone I think can be trusted. Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2023 9:00 AM Remember, don't believe anything you read or see online (including this). Be cynical. We are in unstable times. I hope we all get through it without a major incident. Best Information About RFK Jrby doug - 2023-07-01 ( education / research / civics / politics ) [html version]New book. And this guy is interviewed about it. I think he'd (RFK JR.) make a very good president and plan to donate to his campaign by tomorrow, which is the deadline at this stage. Col. MacGregor: U.S. Will Implode. No 2024 Electionsby bill - 2023-07-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Somebody says that every 4 years. They keep hoping. "Colonel Douglas Macgregor is probably one of the most astute military observers in America. He just said America might not even have elections in November of 2024. There are 2 short videos I want to share today. The first is ..." Former Clinton Adviser Warns Biden Might Not Have the Votes to Win in 2024by bill - 2023-07-18 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]That didn't stop him last time. "Former Clinton adviser Doug Schoen voiced his apprehension about President Joe Biden's prospects in the 2024 election during a recent segment on Fox News. The interview touched on Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' odds in the forthcoming race, his prospective challenges in resonating with voters, and his fundraising obstacles due to the enduring popularity of ..." Caitlin Johnstone Quoteby admin - 2023-07-29 ( culture / quotes / politics ) [html version]I love this quote!
Read the article here: capitol-hill-is-an-assisted-living-facility-for-psychopaths Adam Schiff, Top Democrats Demand That Trump's Trials Be Televisedby bill - 2023-08-05 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Because of the strikes, Hollywood needs more free content. "A group of House Democrats led by Rep. Adam Schiff of California have demanded that the federal trials of former President Donald Trump be televised, according to a letter they wrote on Thursday...." Arizona Dirty Politicsby doug - 2023-08-16 ( education / research ) [html version]In case of interest. An elected official was expelled because she wanted to clean up all the fraud. It's a uniparty with scumbags on all sides who just want to hold onto their power. She says it's more than just AZ. https://www.bitchute.com/video/pc8NcxTW1UlM/ kind of related: I saw a GREAT interview that Tucker Carlson did of Marjorie Taylor Greene that everybody ought to watch but I saw it posted on FB and couldn't find it elsewhere (maybe unless I signed up for his podcasts) and it's really long.The most disgusting thing in that video is how Congress is essentially made up of LOSERS who couldn't make a living otherwise and didn't care about anything other than being repeatedly elected.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 09:33:08 PM
In case of interest. An elected official was expelled because she wanted to clean up all the fraud. It's a uniparty with scumbags on all sides who just want to hold onto their power. She says it's more than just AZ. https://www.bitchute.com/video/pc8NcxTW1UlM/ kind of related: I saw a GREAT interview that Tucker Carlson did of Marjorie Taylor Greene that everybody ought to watch but I saw it posted on FB and couldn't find it elsewhere (maybe unless I signed up for his podcasts) and it's really long.The most disgusting thing in that video is how Congress is essentially made up of LOSERS who couldn't make a living otherwise and didn't care about anything other than being repeatedly elected.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 09:33:08 PM
In case of interest. An elected official was expelled because she wanted to clean up all the fraud. It's a uniparty with scumbags on all sides who just want to hold onto their power. She says it's more than just AZ. https://www.bitchute.com/video/pc8NcxTW1UlM/ How Trump's Latest Indictment Could Signal the End of Free Speechby jeff dornik - 2023-08-19 ( education / news / politics / legal ) [html version]The America First Movement is up in arms over the latest Trump indictments, and rightly so. We’ve seen the Deep State and the Swamp Creatures of the Uniparty throw everything they have at him to ensure he does not get into office. They’ve impeached him twice, smeared him in the media, held show trials over January 6th (which was also a setup) and are now throwing dozens of indictments at him, just praying (hoping, not praying… they don’t believe in God) that something sticks. The latest indictments involving both Trump and his attorneys are an entirely new beast, altogether. This has far-reaching implications well beyond just whether Donald Trump can become president or not. If this results in a guilty verdict, we are witnessing the end of the First Amendment altogether. Read the rest here: how-trumps-latest-indictment-could-signal-the-end-of-free-speech FBI in Michigan Sits on Evidence of Election Fraudby doug - 2023-08-30 ( education / news / politics / corruption ) [html version]Yes, it's the correct link but they did quickly mention Maui fires. She's a great example of a Democrat coming to her senses. She's smart enough not to support the right-wing demons, but sees the blatant crime from virtually all politicians. Politicians are not going to fix all this sh-t pedo joe is doing for the deep state. It's the cliche "we the people" who must do it. Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 5:19 PM That looks a link to the Maui video to me On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 02:07:44 PM This is for the people who just can't believe there was any fraud in the 2020 (s)election. For people with any rational thinking skills, this is just more of the same old stuff a million times over. Democrat Naomi Wolf interviews the main person at the Gateway Pundit who found new evidence that should outrage everyone but it won't because of the media blackout on any journalism and truth. I'm trying not to be preaching to the choir. NM Governor Suspends 2nd Amendmentby steve - 2023-09-12 ( education / news / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]It's a test in one city for one month (to see if the sheeple will put up with it?) On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:55:30 AM This is a trap set for Americans to get arrested like the FBI did on Jan 6th. And it's obviously a globalist attempt to see how easy it is to get people to lay down and willingly give up their rights so that more states like Communist California and NY can do the same. Anyone with a brain knows the only reason we're not already under blatant fascist control is the 2nd amendment. So they are trying to find and manufacture every reason to cancel it. This bitch should immediately be arrested for treason. Putin Says Trump Charges Are Politically Motivatedby bill - 2023-09-13 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]In Russian accent: "Reminds me of old Soviet days" "Russian President Vladimir Putin weighed in on the criminal charges faced by former President Donald Trump on Tuesday, saying the cases demonstrate political revenge and corruption..." 70% of Americans Want Term Limits for Congressmenby bill - 2023-09-13 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]No more than two consecutive terms for any political position, elected or appointed, including judges. "More than two-thirds of Americans from across the political spectrum 70 percent would support introducing term limits for Members of Congress, including 68 percent of Democrats and over three-quarters of Republicans at 76 percent,according to a recent survey from Rasmussen Reports. Only 15 percent of Americans would oppose such a step, comprised of 18 percen ..." 'Turning Into Jello': Glenn Greenwald Says Some Dems Are Looking To 'Sabotage' Bidenby bill - 2023-09-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Simple solution, let the GOP impeach and REMOVE him ASAP. "Journalist Glenn Greenwald said Wednesday some Democrats were looking to sabotage President Joe Biden due to his age and mounting scandals surrounding his family's business dealings. ..." 1967-2008 Zionist Israel treacheryby steve - 2023-11-28 ( education / civics / politics / usa ) [html version]I don't know about Kevin Kiley. Before he was actually voted in, I warned him about Israel, even giving him the link to Cynthia McKinney's video of how Israel wanted her to pledge to Israel instead of the Constitution: Cynthia McKinney US Lawmakers Forced to Sign Pledge to Support Israel On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 02:51:05 PM PST: I think only one Republican in Congress, Massey, isn't sold out to Israel. Yes, it's so disgusting. Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 1:36 PM It's so sad that most Christians are Christian Zionists because the "Synagogue of Satan" Kontrols so much. On Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 12:24:57 PM PST:
Watch the first 8 minutes at least to learn a little-known piece of history. Israel, October 7 Attack: Foreknowledge in Financial Markets. Massive Short-sellingby bill - 2023-12-06 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Just like 9/11. Total coincidence, I'm sure. "Days before the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, stock traders magically began anticipating events to come. Research by law professors Robert Jackson Jr from NYU and Joshua Mitts of Columbia reveals MASSIVE short-selling leading up to the attacks..." FBI Couldn't Admit Hunter Biden Laptop Was Real Because It Was 'An Election Season'by bill - 2023-12-07 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]They had to be sure Biden was inserted as president. "By Libby Emmons – The Post Millennial Senator John Kennedy grilled FBI Director Christopher Wray in the Senate on Tuesday, demanding to know why the..." Do we really need elections?by doug - 2023-12-18 ( education / research / politics / voting ) [html version]Some think not: See Elections Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2023 9:16 AM We don't need politicians, just sane laws and sane enforcement of those laws, with THE PEOPLE making and voting to keep or remove those laws. So, we do need voting... counted by hand. Chinese Shipping Giant COSCO to Stop Visiting Israeli Portsby bill - 2024-01-10 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]You know you're a pariah when even China won't do business with you. "Chinese state-supported shipping giant COSCO Shipping has stopped visiting Israeli ports, "Globes" has learned. The company, the fourth largest container shipping line in the world, with about 11% of world trade, decided on this step even though it is not much threatened in the Red Sea, because of the very fact that it is Chinese, and because of China's ties with Iran, the patron of the Houthi rebels in Yemen...." Shiva Double Headerby doug - 2024-01-14 ( education / civics / politics / fraud ) [html version]On 1/12/2024 11:39 PM: It's your lucky day if you like Dr Shiva. He reveals that Trump was selected as president in 2016, placed there by Zionists. He shows how the election process is manipulated. And has a story of how one of his volunteers in KY was arrested for collecting signatures to place Dr Shiva on the ballot in that state. Watch Adams on Bitchute Watch SGT Report on Bitchute On Saturday, January 13, 2024 at 04:40:11 AM PST, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump's one and only job for the Zionists was to move our embassy to Jerusalem, which he did. They think very long term. Four years putting up with the jackass Trump was worth that one move for them. On 1/13/2024 7:41 AM, someone wrote: but why did that matter to them? On 1/14/2024 6:41 AM, someone wrote: I don't pretend to understand those idiots, other than they're like spoiled children who need to get their way, at all costs. Some Fear Trump Will Use Military in Dictatorial Ways If Reelectedby bill - 2024-01-15 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]He's the only recent president (or candidate) who isn't trigger-happy. "Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon...." There Is No Such Thing as "Representative" Government, and Never Has Beenby bill - 2024-01-21 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]Sadly, true. Only the monied interests are represented. "Since mankind's dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away..." Interesting Story of Democrat Stronghold in Connecticutby steve - 2024-01-24 ( education / research / politics / corruption ) [html version]More liberal criminality. Yeah, conservatives also do plenty of crime, but it seems election fraud is a liberal specialty. On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 01:33:07 PM PST: Gomes, I'm guessing of Portuguese from Cabo Verde descent, tells really interesting details about what happened to him when he ran against the Democrat incumbent. A judge has invalidated the election and ordered a new one. Hope this link works: Biden Regime Slams Political Targeting of Banned Venezuela Opposition Leaderby bill - 2024-01-28 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Only U.S. Democrats are allowed to ban their opposition. "The U.S. government has condemned the decision of Venezuela's highest court to block the presidential candidacy of opposition leader Mara Corina Machado...." More Voters Are, In Hindsight, Rating Trump's Presidency as 'Better than Expected'by bill - 2024-02-10 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Not bad. But then, compared to our current idiot, anyone would look good. "Voters are delivering a poor assessment of President Joe Bidens job performance. They are also looking back more fondly than before on Donald Trumps tenure...." Biden's memory struggles imperil national security: 'Not only weak, but confused'by bill - 2024-02-12 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Put him out to pasture. "A report that described Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," has led some to question how he may react in a time of crisis...." Justice Jackson Says It's Time To Abolish the First Amendmentby bill - 2024-03-20 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]We need term limits for the Supremes "Supreme Court JusticeKetanji Brown Jackson has declared that America needs to abolish the First Amendment in order to allow the government to use its power more effectively. Jackson addressed Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiaga, whose..." Oscar-Winning "Zone of Interest" Director Villified for Speaking the Truthby bill - 2024-03-20 ( education / news / entertainment / politics ) [html version]Brave man! "Glazer was accepting the Oscar for Best International Film for The Zone of Interest, his movie about an Auschwitz commandant and his wife who try to build a dream life next to the camp. " Read, listen or watch the rest here: Hollywood Jews Hate this Guy 7 in 10 Dems Fear Trump Returnby bill - 2024-03-28 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]7 in 10 watch too much mainstream news " Conspiracy Theory No More? Tennessee Senate Passes Bill Banning Chemtrails-Geoengineeringby bill - 2024-04-02 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Good news! "Recent legislation targeting geoengineering projects sparks a fresh debate about the long controversial topic of weather modification. Here we dive into the history of such projects to expose the truth. (By Don Via , Jr. | Republished from The Rundown Live) A bill has passed the Tennessee state legislature which aims to target the controversial..." Israel bombs World Central Kitchen convoy killing foreign aid workersby bill - 2024-04-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]But don't you dare criticize Israel. They are above reproach. "Seven aid workers with the charity World Central Kitchen were killed in an Israeli strike...." Mass Layoffs Begin At California Fast Food Chains As $20 Minimum Wage Law Takes Effectby bill - 2024-04-03 ( life / money / employment / politics ) [html version]I am shocked. Shocked! "This result shouldn't surprise anyone. Inflation has driven up operational costs for businesses across the US and shrunk profit margins for major..." Biden and Xi hold first discussions since November, talk Taiwan and techby bill - 2024-04-03 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]...and Biden to receive his marching orders? "Call comes ahead of flurry of diplomatic engagement, with both US and China maintaining they want to reduce friction. ..." RFK Apologizes After Briefly Appearing to Back J6 Defendantsby bill - 2024-04-06 ( education / news / politics ) [html version]Apologizing for ever-so-briefly having a spine?
Good Heavy Metal Truth Songby doug - 2024-04-29 ( culture / music / rock / politics ) [html version]Someone shared this with me. Pretty good. Here's the Deal Governor Kamala Harris?by steve - 2024-05-18 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Kevin, When will you address before Congress how the WHO wants to take away the sovereignty of the USA and the rest of the world for a New World Order? Or, is that not important enough for you? On Friday, May 17, 2024 at 01:05:51 PM PDT, Kevin Kiley someone wrote: Hi, I've just published a new blog post: Could Get Worse Politico reports Kamala Harris has told friends she will return to California to run for Governor if Biden loses. This might be the only possible way our state's political leadership could get worse. As if to preserve his title as the bigger disaster, Newsom just declared his homelessness policy a 'national model.' I called this the 'height of delusion,' leading Newsom to be ridiculed far and wide as the comment ricocheted from Fox News to the Daily Wire and beyond. This week, I cross-examined another prospective candidate for California Governor: Biden Health Secretary Xavier Becerra. Incredibly, Becerra stood by the 30 universities that still have Covid vaccine mandates. Today, I read the name of each one on the House Floor. I also asked Becerra if he supported Newsom's $3 billion expansion of Medi-Cal to everyone here illegally. He replied 'absolutely' " effectively turning taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal immigrants into Biden Administration policy. Finally, I asked him about the secret Chinese bio lab found in California, and whether he could say with confidence there aren't others. He could not. I've introduced legislation to find any other such labs, and just sent a letter demanding answers as to why the CDC ignored this one. Meanwhile, the Judiciary Committee cited Merrick Garland for contempt for withholding recordings of Biden's interviews with Special Counsel Hur. Minutes before the hearing, Biden asserted 'Executive Privilege' over the recordings. I laid out the 6 absurdities of Biden's position. And after I called for the removal of CSU Sonoma State's President, he was placed on 'leave' and has now resigned. You can watch here as I document the unbelievable ways that he and other campus leaders are appeasing lawless encampments. This won't be the last resignation. I've sent a letter to the heads of the CSU and UC systems with a clear message: any university leader who caves to a lawless mob needs to be removed immediately. Kevin Kiley, California Congressman Hilarious New Parody Songby steve - 2024-05-21 ( culture / humor / politics / music ) [html version]I posted it in lots of FB forums and didn't get automatic rejection On Monday, May 20, 2024 at 05:01:05 PM PDT: It's being frantically censored. See if you can guess why. Why Does the Government Borrow When It Can Print Money?by bill - 2024-06-24 ( education / news / politics / money ) [html version]Good question! "In the first seven months of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, net interest (payments minus income) on the federal debt reached $514 billion, exceeding spending on both national defense ($498 billion) and Medicare ($465 billion). The interest tab also exceeded all the money spent on veterans, education, and transportation combined. Spending on interest is now the second largest line item in the federal budget after Social Security and the fastest growing part of the budget, on track to reach $870 billion by the end of 2024." Why Georgia voters are looking to third-party candidates ahead of the debateby bill - 2024-06-27 ( education / news / politics / usa ) [html version]Here's a better option: shiva4president.com/about-shiva "Georgia voters in the latest NBC News Deciders Focus Group who backed Biden or Trump in 2020 are taking a serious look at RFK Jr. and third-party candidates. ..." Presidential Masksby doug - 2024-07-24 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Is piece of sh-t Biden dead? This is an excellent report about masks from Reese. On Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 01:24:58 PM PDT, someone wrote: Yeah, the masks they have can fool anybody and one mask creator pulled one over on George Bush in the White House and then showed him she had a mask on. Biden is Suddenly 5 Inches Tallerby steve - 2024-07-27 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Fake president Pedo Joe has suddenly gotten way taller. This is pretty surprising. I haven't heard anyone else mention this yet. On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 05:10:09 PM PDT, someone wrote: Likely due to a "load off his mind" and the weight of being president (I haven't looked at the video yet) Does Israel influence Americans?by steve - 2024-07-28 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]netanyahu us a warmonger and lots of israelis don't like him for that.he wants to exterminate the Gazans to STEAL the oil reserves off the coast.congress gave him a massive BOW to him during that speech of his except for two of them (both "parties"/parts of the UniParty) Kind of related to demonism, in the Olympics that had that mocking of the Last Supper by doing it with drag queens and they had that "pale white horse" in their parade On Saturday, July 27, 2024 at 08:45:50 AM PDT, someone wrote: Shows video evidence of how Israel is so carefully bombing Gaza and is involved in American politics. You really should watch at least the first 14 minutes or so : https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuj37fBTWMoD . Interview about Kamala by blacksby steve - 2024-08-02 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]Interesting interview about VP Christian Zionistsby steve - 2024-08-04 ( education / research / religion / politics ) [html version]That's exactly what I copy and paste on israeli FB sites all the time. On Saturday, August 3, 2024 at 07:27:47 PM PDT, someone wrote: I don't know that I'd write something like that to some politically fervent Jew, but if others reading it can learn something it's probably worth it. On Saturday, August 3rd, 2024 at 2:05 PM, someone wrote: Yeah, it's a mental illness. Criticism of fake Christians who sold out to zionism: It's disgusting how you IGNORE the truth about Israel 1 - the jewish noahide sublaw 16 says that if you say "Jesus is the messiah", that'd IDOLATRY and you ought to be beheaded. 2 -96% of israelis are ashkenazis, descended from Ashkenaz, descended from Japheth and REAL SEMITES descend from Shem so that 96% are NOT SEMITES and the way they fraudulently occupy Palestine, Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 call them the "Synagogue of Satan" 3 - the "antisemitism awareness act" is ANTI-CHRISTIAN in how it's antisemitic to criticize israel, judaism, zionism, or semitism but is it "anti-hispanic" to criticize Mexico, Catholicism, any mexican political group, or Hispanic? Of course you won't reply because you are OWNED by the demonic Rothschild Zionists On Saturday, August 3, 2024 at 11:33:23 AM PDT, someone wrote: They believe that a Middle East war will fulfill a prophesy and signal the end of the world, whereupon they will ascend to heaven as the chosen ones (yeah, right). On 8/3/2024 7:58 AM, someone wrote: Christian Zionists want the world to end These completely foolish idiots are our worst enemies - maybe even more than pedo joe and his deep state puppet masters who are taking advantage of these false beliefs for their own demonic agenda. Terrific reporting: Watch on BitChute War with Iranby doug - 2024-08-07 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]In case you haven't been following the latest psychotic actions of Israel expansionism, check out this 5 minute summary by Nick Fuentes: On Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 02:23:32 PM PDT, someone wrote: Netanyahu is a warmonger and pulls the strings of Congress. Kamala isn't smart or powerful enough to not be a puppet so, as that financial guy with the super smart computer said, we're likely to go to war, but I think he said in 2025 or 2026. Of course, Trump would likely also go along. Newsom Barred from Stageby steve - 2024-08-21 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]"Americans look past the propaganda and see the truth"? Funny, since you are owned by the Zionists with their globalist propaganda. PS: In case you think that's antisemitic, well, most NY Jews are against Zionism: On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 02:41:04 PM PDT, Kevin Kiley wrote: Hi, I've just published a new blog post: Newsom's Humiliation Today is a humiliating day for Gavin Newsom. He thought it would be him accepting the nomination, but he isn't even allowed on the Convention stage. California's Lieutenant Governor gets to speak from the stage while Newsom is relegated to a few words from down on the Floor. This humiliation, of course, is very well-earned. We've paid an incalculable price for the constant posturing and self-promoting of his shadow presidential campaign. During Covid, 40 million Californians were at the mercy of whatever he thought would get him in the headlines. Yet if Kamala were being honest, she'd give Newsom a primetime speaking slot. No one can better convey her goal of turning America into San Francisco. Just two days ago, Newsom insanely declared California a "national model" when it comes to (of all things) retail theft. During the Convention this week, I'm doing interviews (see Newsmax, Fox, OAN) to help Americans look past the propaganda and see the truth: that San Francisco is a case study of what happens when the radical politics of Harris and Newsom reach their logical endpoint. And Kamala has explicitly called for spreading these policies nationwide, saying California is a "role model" for America. The irony is her candidacy comes just as Californians have decided enough is enough; her own state is rejecting the "model" she hopes to nationalize. One new poll shows Kamala protege George Gascon will be crushed in his reelection bid for Los Angeles DA. Another shows our anti-Prop. 47 initiative (Prop. 36) passing overwhelmingly, with even Democrat voters supporting it by an 18-point margin. And the University of California just banned campus encampments. If only they'd done this months ago when I called for it in a letter to the UC President. Still, it's another step on the path to sanity for California and the reckoning for American higher education. Help me fight for California and our country Kevin Kiley, California Congressman Great new interview with Dr Shivaby steve - 2024-08-22 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]By Mike Adams. Really good. Should watch it. On Wednesday, August 21, 2024 at 07:23:27 PM PDT, someone wrote: yes, great video but most aren't that interested in the LIE we've been told Anti-Zionismby steve - 2024-08-23 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]I'm listening but most important is that he said that Skyhorse is the place to get controversial stuff published. On Thursday, August 22, 2024 at 02:49:50 PM PDT, someone wrote: So, even the CIA started out on the right track, only to be subverted by infiltrators/traitors. On 8/22/2024 1:56 PM, someone wrote: There are some comments in this about JFK that might help answer this question. On Thursday, August 22nd, 2024 at 1:27 PM, someone wrote: I'm doing research for the "Recruiter" story and wondered about a connection between the CIA and the Zionists. Well, this article told how in the start of the CIA (1947) they were for the Arabs and against the zionists but also against the commies. I'll have to do more research. I wonder about JFK and the zionists. The Early CIA and Its Anti-Zionist Maneuvering, by Asaf Romirowsky At the turn of the 21st century through today, American involvement in Middle Eastern politics runs through the... Read the rest here: https://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Book-Review-The-early-CIA-and-its-anti-Zionist-maneuvering-390849 Will we have a 2024 election?by steve - 2024-08-25 ( education / research / politics / conspiracies ) [html version]Interesting. Something about Sarah bothers me. I've said for some while that "plan B" was to nuke us but they went with Plan C, the scamdemic, but they may still go back to Plan B (but not nuke all but the large cities). On Saturday, August 24, 2024 at 07:50:22 AM PDT, someone wrote: Naomi Wolf doesn't think so. We've just witnessed a coup, ironically against an installed puppet who obviously stole the 2020 election. The question is who actually runs the country now? And more importantly, how can we get the country back? Naomi Wolf gives excellent advice on how we can survive what's coming and how not to comply with the tyranny. Really an important video to watch. A future with Kamala/Walzby steve - 2024-08-31 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]You'll get to experience Marxist re-education camps and look forward to Klaus Schwab's "own nothing and be happy" Read, listen or watch the rest here: thedailybs.com How will the US military fare in war?by steve - 2024-08-31 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]the zionists tell congress, you're either with us or against us (and if you're against us, ...) On Saturday, August 3, 2024 at 10:41:20 PM PDT, someone wrote: Accurate account of the degraded condition of the US military and it's ability to wage war. While these congress people talk in terms of military defense, anyone paying the slightest attention knows the USA never defends anything. They are the aggressors who attack and provoke others. At least these people are not giving more bullsh-t for the gullible to swallow wholesale. We're being set up to fail in every conceivable way - financially, physically, psychologically, militarily, industrially, etc, which is the globalist agenda. And the fools in Congress, virtually all being Zionist puppets controlled by Israel, just keep their blinders on and allow Israel to dictate everything they want. They are all unconvicted criminals. I can't wait to see how the new transgender soldiers will do against real fighting soldiers. https://www.bitchute.com/video/K9axzS5hhlPL . Trump Owes Banksters, Big Timeby steve - 2024-09-03 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]We're surrounded by liberals with kamala signs here. I'm tempted to make a "Walz brother is for Trump" sign and wonder how long it'd last on our lawn. Other people who had Trump signs on their lawn were attacked. Gee, who are the HATERS? On Monday, September 2, 2024 at 10:03:55 AM PDT, someone wrote: Yea, exactly the lazy asses I mentioned. I have a custom metal piece I got for my mailbox that says "freedom isn't free" which I still need to attach. These lazy ass people don't deserve sh-t if they can't get involved in fixing our country. On Monday, September 2nd, 2024 at 11:53 AM, someone wrote: unfortunately, most see this as "blah, blah, blah" and remaining ignorant and "going along to get along" is bliss On Monday, September 2, 2024 at 09:22:32 AM PDT, someone wrote: Do you seriously think he isn't beholden to them? And since these banksters probably all wear small hats, with a son in law who wears one and his often stated undying support for them, he's little more than an actor on puppet strings controlled by fake Jew Zionists. Yes, he's probably way better than the current fake vice president, but is he really the deep state's worst nightmare? Don't get your hopes too high when another professed puppet of the Zionists (RFK Jr) joins forces. "I will never let you down" are empty words that are just hopium for the masses. Take a look at a real America first patriot candidate for president, Dr Shiva. No, he won't win but the fact he's raising the awareness of people of the true problem which is Americans have become lazy and detached from politics. He's trying to ignite a bottom's up movement to change the bullsh-t the parasite class (we foolishly call elites) has created since 1776. It's the only real way to take back our country from these Marxists controlled by technocrats that are in full swing of creating a real dystopia. We have to raise the level of consciousness of enough people to make the changes at the local level which in the agate will change the whole country. Why Modern Day Jews Have No Legitimate Claim to Israelby doug - 2024-09-06 ( education / research / religion / politics ) [html version]Pretty interesting historical argument by Adams: Watch on Bitchute Israelis are NOT the Jews of the bible. They were from Khazaria (Ukraine) so their ancestors did not formerly occupy it. On 9/6/2024 12:29 AM, someone wrote: No one has a legitimate claim to any land unless they purchased it. Failing that, they have to have discovered it... unoccupied. If our great-grandparents inhabited a plot of land two hundred years ago, then abandoned it for a hundred years, you and I would not be allowed to come back and claim it as ours simply because someone in our family used to live there. Zionist/Israeli claims are absolute bullsh-t. On Thursday, September 5, 2024 at 10:15:01 PM PDT, someone wrote: I haven't watched it yet but I've done the research. The Ashkenazis are NOT SEMITES. They are descended from Japheth instead of Shem and the only reason they have Israel now is because the Rothschilds BOUGHT OFF Woodrow Wilson with the Balfour Declaration. They are NOT the "Jews of the bible." There are MANY Jews in New York who didn't want to go along with the Zionists and are against Zionism. Here's some videos of them protesting Zionism: Jews Against Zionism On Friday, September 6, 2024 at 07:07:57 AM PDT, someone wrote: In case either one of you still hasn't watched it, both of your arguments were given. Joe Rogan Interview of Donald Trumpby doug - 2024-10-27 ( education / research / politics ) [html version]In case you want to watch the Joe Rogan interview of Trump. It was interesting, I think. Click here: Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump - 3 hrs On Saturday, October 26, 2024 at 10:05:58 PM PDT, someone wrote: I can't imagine that it'd be worth my 3 hours of time. Call It What It Is, Genocideby norman d. spuse - 2024-11-03 ( education / news / politics / israel ) [html version]Call it what it is, GENOCIDE. What human rights are being violated in Palestine? Deprivation of the right to self-determination, extra-judicial killings, restrictions on freedom of movement and assembly and illegal settlements were some of glaring manifestations of human rights violations of the Palestinian people. See why Israel can kill innocent children with American taxpayer money. See on youtube why Israel is in deep trouble. See on tiktok.com what [former] US president says about Israel. See how innocent children are killed by American-made bombs at Al Jazeera Arabic Live. If you do not do something such as going on the street and telling your government to stop killing the Gaza people and stop the Israeli War and send food to the starving people of Gaza. If you cannot do it then forward this message with the above links to at least 4 of your friends and ask them to forward it to 4 of their friends so that the world will know that the new mass murderers are the Jews of the world. It is ironic that the Holocaust survivors (the Jews) are creating a new Holocaust against the Philistines in Gaza. If you do not do this also then you do not have a HEART. Trump Dumps Pompeo and Haleyby doug - 2024-11-10 ( education / civics / politics ) [html version]This is promising. Thanks to Alex Jones On Sunday, November 10, 2024 at 05:55:04 AM PST, someone wrote: Great, two Deep State globalists. I wonder who told him to do it (no, I haven't watched the video yet) blog version similar posts here ... and elsewhere CommentsWe enjoy free speech. Try not to offend, but feel free to be offended.Leave a new comment regarding "politics-page": |