PCR Test Fraud
by don - 2021-02-22 18:53:56 ( in education, research) [php version] rebuild (131566)
*Confession from Fauci
Smoking gun: Fauci states covid PCR test has fatal flaw; confession
from the "beloved" expert of experts
The covid PCR test is a complete fraud*
by Jon Rappoport
February 22, 2021
"This article is part of my current series on the covid PCR test
. These articles prove that the test is fatally flawed, gives
rise to hugely inflated and false case numbers, which in turn lead
to the unnecessary and brutal lockdowns.
I'm hoping readers will spread this information far and wide.
OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.
Right from the horse's mouth. Right from the man we're told is the
number-one covid expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.
Well, how about THIS?
July 16, 2020, podcast, "This Week In Virology" : Tony Fauci
makes a point of saying the PCR covid test is useless and misleading
when the test is run at "35 cycles or higher." A positive result,
indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci's key quote
(starting at the 3m50s mark) : "...If you get [perform the test at]
a cycle threshold of 35 or more...the chances of it being
replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule...you almost never
can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37
threshold cycle...even 36..."
Each "cycle" of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and
magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant
material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That's called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes
the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40
cycles. Not 35.
Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are
knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a
monstrous level, because...
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the
virus on the basis of a false positive result, and...
The total number of covid cases in America—which is based on the
test—is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these
fraudulent case numbers.
Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is
useless when it's run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the
test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is
there. This is the crime in a nutshell.
"Hello, America, you've been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for
a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was
If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull
Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat
out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul,
stench-ridden assault on the global economy and its 8 billion citizens.
All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I've written
above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document
titled  [3a] [3b]: "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only." See pdf
page 38 (doc page 37). This document is marked, "Effective:
12/01/2020." That means, even though the virus is being referred to
by its older name, the document is still relevant as of Dec 2020.
"For Emergency Use Only" refers to the fact that the FDA has
certified the PCR test under a traditional category called
"Emergency Use Authorization."
FDA: "...a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if
all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross
the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct)."
Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude,
"Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the
test all the way to 40 cycles. That's the official advice."
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September
17) headlined: "Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it
shouldn't be."  Here are money quotes:
"Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37."
"Set the limit" would usually mean, "We're going to look all the way
to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there."
The Times: "This number of amplification cycles needed to find the
virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results
sent to doctors and coronavirus patients..."
Boom. That's the capper, the grand finale. Labs don't or won't
reveal their collusion in this crime.
Get the picture?
I hope so.
If a lawyer won't go to court with all this, or if a judge won't pay
attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs
and sent to the Arctic to sell snow."
[3a] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 06, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral
Diseases, Effective: 12/01/2020; see:
[3b] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral
Diseases, Effective: 07/13/2020; see:
similar posts here ... and elsewhere
Comments (We enjoy free speech. Try not to offend, but feel free to be offended.)
Leave your own comment: