so,= Trump is president 'OF the United States' (the DC corporation) bu= t not 'FOR the United States' as this article explains:= The United Sta= tes Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporation! | | | The United States Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporat= ion! Lisa Guliani's explanation of the fact that the 'United States of America' = is actually a corporation which owns ... | | |
On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:37:19 PM PST, someone wrote: I found it. No wonder I couldn't find it because I copied it in my drawin= g program but never saved it from there:Trump's says 'of the United States'= .O'bama/biden's said 'of the United States of America'.According to the art= icle,the real one says 'for' instead of 'of' so the ones for trump, o'bama = and biden are WRONG:
On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:16:57 PM PST, ste= ve wrote: yeah, I remember that much. I was just wondering if you, , remembered= which was which and which one trump was to join. I imagine that o'bama and= biden were on the wrong side so maybe trump is actually switching to the g= ood side?I checked my archives. Here's an article that I haven't read as I = started this email:
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm Here's an excerpt: Thedate is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session.I= = refer you to the 'Acts of the Forty-First Congress,'Section= 34, = Session= III, chapters= 61 and= 62. Onthis date in the history = of our nation, Congress passed an Acttitled: 'AnAct To Provide A Government= for the District of Columbia.' Thisis also known as the 'Act of 1871.'What= does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under noconstitutional autho= rity to do so, created a separate form ofgovernment for the District of Col= umbia, which is a ten mile squareparcel of land. Here's why: Thiswas true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankerswere = not about to lend our floundering nation any money without someserious stip= ulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of gettingtheir foot in the door= of the United States (a prize they had covetedfor some time, but had been = unable to grasp thanks to our FoundingFathers, who despised them and held t= hem in check), and thus, the Actof 1871 was passed. Inessence, this Act formed the corporationknown as THE UNITED STATES.Note t= he capitalization, because it is important. This corporation,owned by forei= gn interests, moved right in and shoved the original'organic' version of th= e Constitution into a dusty corner. Withthe 'Act of 1871,' our Constitution was defaced in thesense that the ti= tle was block-capitalized and the word 'for'was changed to the word 'of' in= the title. The originalConstitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was w= ritten in thismanner: 'TheConstitution for the united states of America'. Thealtered version reads: 'THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA'= . It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the samedocument you might th= ink it is. The corporate constitution operatesin an economic capacity and h= as been used to fool the People intothinking it is the same parchment that = governs the Republic. Itabsolutely is not. Whatthe Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create anentir= ely new document, a constitution for the government of theDistrict of Colum= bia. The kind of government THEY created was acorporation. The new, altered= Constitution serves as the constitutionof the corporation, and not that of= America. Insteadof absolute rights guaranteed under the 'organic'Constitution, we no= w have 'relative' rights or privileges.One example of this is the Sovereign= 's right to travel, which hasbeen transformed under corporate government po= licy into a 'privilege'which we must be licensed to engage in. Mindyou, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District ofColu= mbia. THEY just want you to think it does. There's a lot more in the article as to specifics but I can't find that scr= eenshot that I took and which one had the 'good' title
On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 09:51:52 PM PST, someone wrote: Yea, there's some distinction between our original government and a corpor= ation, with the corporation being what we have now (since 1865, I think). .
On Sunday, January 19th, 2025 at 7:27 PM, someone wrote: I'm listening but they mentioned the paperwork about being inaugurated un= der the United States vs the United States of America
On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 03:58:22 PM PST, someone wrote:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mS21uagvpawN .
so,= Trump is president 'OF the United States' (the DC corporation) but not 'FOR the United States' as this article explains:= The United States Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporation! | | | The United States Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporation! Lisa Guliani's explanation of the fact that the 'United States of America' is actually a corporation which owns ... | | | On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:37:19 PM PST, someone wrote: I found it. No wonder I couldn't find it because I copied it in my drawing program but never saved it from there:Trump's says 'of the United States'.O'bama/biden's said 'of the United States of America'.According to the article,the real one says 'for' instead of 'of' so the ones for trump, o'bama and biden are WRONG: On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:16:57 PM PST, someone wrote: yeah, I remember that much. I was just wondering if you, , remembered which was which and which one trump was to join. I imagine that o'bama and biden were on the wrong side so maybe trump is actually switching to the good side?I checked my archives. Here's an article that I haven't read as I started this email:
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm Here's an excerpt: Thedate is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session.I= refer you to the 'Acts of the Forty-First Congress,'Section= 34, Session= III, chapters= 61 and= 62. Onthis date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Acttitled: 'AnAct To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.' Thisis also known as the 'Act of 1871.'What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under noconstitutional authority to do so, created a separate form ofgovernment for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile squareparcel of land. Here's why: Thiswas true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankerswere not about to lend our floundering nation any money without someserious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of gettingtheir foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had covetedfor some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our FoundingFathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Actof 1871 was passed. Inessence, this Act formed the corporationknown as THE UNITED STATES.Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation,owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original'organic' version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. Withthe 'Act of 1871,' our Constitution was defaced in thesense that the title was block-capitalized and the word 'for'was changed to the word 'of' in the title. The originalConstitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in thismanner: 'TheConstitution for the united states of America'. Thealtered version reads: 'THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA'. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the samedocument you might think it is. The corporate constitution operatesin an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People intothinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. Itabsolutely is not. Whatthe Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create anentirely new document, a constitution for the government of theDistrict of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was acorporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitutionof the corporation, and not that of America. Insteadof absolute rights guaranteed under the 'organic'Constitution, we now have 'relative' rights or privileges.One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which hasbeen transformed under corporate government policy into a 'privilege'which we must be licensed to engage in. Mindyou, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District ofColumbia. THEY just want you to think it does. There's a lot more in the article as to specifics but I can't find that screenshot that I took and which one had the 'good' title On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 09:51:52 PM PST, someone wrote: Yea, there's some distinction between our original government and a corporation, with the corporation being what we have now (since 1865, I think). . On Sunday, January 19th, 2025 at 7:27 PM, someone wrote: I'm listening but they mentioned the paperwork about being inaugurated under the United States vs the United States of America On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 03:58:22 PM PST, someone wrote:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mS21uagvpawN .
so,= Trump is president 'OF the United States' (the DC corporation) but not 'FOR the United States' as this article explains:= The United States Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporation! | | | The United States Isn't a Country ' It's a Corporation! Lisa Guliani's explanation of the fact that the 'United States of America' is actually a corporation which owns ... | | | On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:37:19 PM PST, someone wrote: I found it. No wonder I couldn't find it because I copied it in my drawing program but never saved it from there:Trump's says 'of the United States'.O'bama/biden's said 'of the United States of America'.According to the article,the real one says 'for' instead of 'of' so the ones for trump, o'bama and biden are WRONG: On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 10:16:57 PM PST, someone wrote: yeah, I remember that much. I was just wondering if you, , remembered which was which and which one trump was to join. I imagine that o'bama and biden were on the wrong side so maybe trump is actually switching to the good side?I checked my archives. Here's an article that I haven't read as I started this email:
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm Here's an excerpt: Thedate is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session.I= refer you to the 'Acts of the Forty-First Congress,'Section= 34, Session= III, chapters= 61 and= 62. Onthis date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Acttitled: 'AnAct To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.' Thisis also known as the 'Act of 1871.'What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under noconstitutional authority to do so, created a separate form ofgovernment for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile squareparcel of land. Here's why: Thiswas true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankerswere not about to lend our floundering nation any money without someserious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of gettingtheir foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had covetedfor some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our FoundingFathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Actof 1871 was passed. Inessence, this Act formed the corporationknown as THE UNITED STATES.Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation,owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original'organic' version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. Withthe 'Act of 1871,' our Constitution was defaced in thesense that the title was block-capitalized and the word 'for'was changed to the word 'of' in the title. The originalConstitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in thismanner: 'TheConstitution for the united states of America'. Thealtered version reads: 'THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA'. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the samedocument you might think it is. The corporate constitution operatesin an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People intothinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. Itabsolutely is not. Whatthe Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create anentirely new document, a constitution for the government of theDistrict of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was acorporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitutionof the corporation, and not that of America. Insteadof absolute rights guaranteed under the 'organic'Constitution, we now have 'relative' rights or privileges.One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which hasbeen transformed under corporate government policy into a 'privilege'which we must be licensed to engage in. Mindyou, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District ofColumbia. THEY just want you to think it does. There's a lot more in the article as to specifics but I can't find that screenshot that I took and which one had the 'good' title On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 09:51:52 PM PST, someone wrote: Yea, there's some distinction between our original government and a corporation, with the corporation being what we have now (since 1865, I think). . On Sunday, January 19th, 2025 at 7:27 PM, someone wrote: I'm listening but they mentioned the paperwork about being inaugurated under the United States vs the United States of America On Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 03:58:22 PM PST, someone wrote:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mS21uagvpawN .
