MISSOURI v. MCNEELY CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI No. 11-1425. Argued January 9, 2013 - Decided April 17, 2013
"This Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally-protected privacy interests... in this case, which involved a compelled physical intrusion beneath McNeely's skin and into his veins to obtain a sample of his blood for use as evidence in a criminal investigation. Such an invasion of bodily integrity implicates an individual's "most personal and deep-rooted expectations of privacy."
"Noting that "search warrants are ordinarily required for searches of dwellings," we reasoned that, absent an emergency, no less could be required where intrusions into the human body are concerned,"
Comments (We enjoy free speech. Try not to offend, but feel free to be offended.)
Leave your own comment:
DISCLAIMER: We are not medical professionals but can comprehend the various articles linked on this site. Think for yourself. Make up your own mind. Those of us with reading comprehension skills and healthy immune systems are much better off trusting our own body rather than the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry.
"We now have hundreds of thousands of so-called 'cases', 'infections' and 'positive tests' but hardly any sick people. Recall that four fifths (80%) of 'infections' are asymptomatic (1) Covid wards have been by and large empty throughout June, July, August and September 2020. Most importantly covid deaths are at an all-time low. It is clear that these 'cases' are in fact not 'cases' but rather they are normal healthy people."